News

New theater, office building pitched for downtown

Philanthropist proposes relocating historic MacArthur Park restaurant in Palo Alto and building new facilities near Caltrain station

The historic MacArthur Park building in downtown Palo Alto would be relocated to make way for a new theater and a multi-story office building under an ambitious proposal from philanthropist John Arrillaga.

The plan, which was unveiled in a staff report Thursday and which the Palo Alto City Council is scheduled to discuss for the first time Monday night, would significantly transform a highly visible site next to the downtown Caltrain station -- a site owned by Stanford University that serves as an entryway into downtown Palo Alto. The city and Stanford University have previously flirted with the idea of building a performance center near this location and had even commissioned a study in 2000 to consider whether such a project would be feasible. The company TheatreWorks, which currently rents space in Palo Alto and Mountain View for its performances, also took part in the 2000 study, seeing the project as a possible permanent home in Palo Alto for its theater operations.

Stanford ultimately decided in 2005 to back away from what was then called the Palo Alto/Stanford University Performance Art Initiative and to pursue its own plan for building performing-arts venues.

Now, the two sides are once again looking to bring major changes to the prominent site. The earlier initiative had evaluated as a possible location for performing-arts facilities the Palo Alto side of El Camino Real -- the city's El Camino Park. The new proposal focuses on a location directly east of that land, 27 University Ave.

"The importance of a site in this area is the link between the University and the City of Palo Alto," Deputy City Manager Steve Emslie wrote in a report. "The area provides a direct link to the University Caltrain station, direct vehicular access and public visibility. The prominence of the site enables a theatre to be a community landmark while having a physical association with Stanford."

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Arrillaga, a developer and philanthropist who is well-known for his significant contributions to Stanford University, his alma mater, pitched the project, according to Emslie's report. The concept includes "a new multi-story office building fronting El Camino Real, a separate theatre building on approximately 60,000-80,000 square feet, and a three-level underground garage," Emslie wrote.

It would also include improvements to transit, pedestrian and bicycle connections and a relocation of the MacArthur Park building, a state-recognized historical landmark that served as a meeting place for soldiers and their families during World War I. Initially located in Menlo Park, the building was moved to its current location in 1919.

The proposal to build a new office building and theater could receive a major boost from the ongoing expansion of Stanford University Medical Center -- a $5 billion project that the council approved last year after several years of public hearings. As part of the approval, the medical center had agreed to pay the city $2.25 million to design and develop an attractive park space with pedestrian pathways, benches and flower borders near the downtown transit station. The goal is to minimize traffic by encouraging people to walk, bike or ride Caltrain to the expanded hospitals.

The development agreement between the city and Stanford specifies that the $2.25 million must be used for "improvements to enhance the pedestrian and bicycle connection" from the transit center to the intersection of El Camino Real and Quarry Road.

Staff is recommending the city use $250,000 from this account to hire an architect, a site planner and an urban designer to evaluate the new proposal and to launch the necessary environmental analyses, including a traffic study, an arborist report, a storm-water-management plan, a sanitary-sewer study and a storm-drain analysis.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

The studies would be the first of many planning steps Palo Alto officials would take to assess and possibly approve the project. According to Emslie's report, the city would probably need to rezone the property to accommodate the new office building; change the Comprehensive Plan, Palo Alto's land-use bible; and prepare an environmental-impact report, a comprehensive analysis of the project's potential impacts and steps needed to compensate for those consequences. Voters may also be asked to "undedicate" a driveway next to El Camino Park that is currently dedicated parkland.

These steps would be undertaken upon submittal of the formal application for this project, according to Emslie.

If the city were to proceed with the project, it would be the second major office development to make its way toward the area around the downtown Caltrain station. The city's Planning and Transportation Commission recently approved a zone change to enable the construction of a five-story building at the intersection of Lytton Avenue and Alma Street. The "Lytton Gateway" development, much like the new proposal, is an example of the city's recent drive to promote dense, mixed-use development near major transit areas -- a key tenet of what is known as New Urbanism.

"The project presents a unique opportunity to create an attractive, vibrant urban destination and identity for people arriving by transit to Palo Alto, one that complements the scale and character of downtown and enhances connectivity to downtown and Stanford," Emslie wrote in the report.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

New theater, office building pitched for downtown

Philanthropist proposes relocating historic MacArthur Park restaurant in Palo Alto and building new facilities near Caltrain station

The historic MacArthur Park building in downtown Palo Alto would be relocated to make way for a new theater and a multi-story office building under an ambitious proposal from philanthropist John Arrillaga.

The plan, which was unveiled in a staff report Thursday and which the Palo Alto City Council is scheduled to discuss for the first time Monday night, would significantly transform a highly visible site next to the downtown Caltrain station -- a site owned by Stanford University that serves as an entryway into downtown Palo Alto. The city and Stanford University have previously flirted with the idea of building a performance center near this location and had even commissioned a study in 2000 to consider whether such a project would be feasible. The company TheatreWorks, which currently rents space in Palo Alto and Mountain View for its performances, also took part in the 2000 study, seeing the project as a possible permanent home in Palo Alto for its theater operations.

Stanford ultimately decided in 2005 to back away from what was then called the Palo Alto/Stanford University Performance Art Initiative and to pursue its own plan for building performing-arts venues.

Now, the two sides are once again looking to bring major changes to the prominent site. The earlier initiative had evaluated as a possible location for performing-arts facilities the Palo Alto side of El Camino Real -- the city's El Camino Park. The new proposal focuses on a location directly east of that land, 27 University Ave.

"The importance of a site in this area is the link between the University and the City of Palo Alto," Deputy City Manager Steve Emslie wrote in a report. "The area provides a direct link to the University Caltrain station, direct vehicular access and public visibility. The prominence of the site enables a theatre to be a community landmark while having a physical association with Stanford."

Arrillaga, a developer and philanthropist who is well-known for his significant contributions to Stanford University, his alma mater, pitched the project, according to Emslie's report. The concept includes "a new multi-story office building fronting El Camino Real, a separate theatre building on approximately 60,000-80,000 square feet, and a three-level underground garage," Emslie wrote.

It would also include improvements to transit, pedestrian and bicycle connections and a relocation of the MacArthur Park building, a state-recognized historical landmark that served as a meeting place for soldiers and their families during World War I. Initially located in Menlo Park, the building was moved to its current location in 1919.

The proposal to build a new office building and theater could receive a major boost from the ongoing expansion of Stanford University Medical Center -- a $5 billion project that the council approved last year after several years of public hearings. As part of the approval, the medical center had agreed to pay the city $2.25 million to design and develop an attractive park space with pedestrian pathways, benches and flower borders near the downtown transit station. The goal is to minimize traffic by encouraging people to walk, bike or ride Caltrain to the expanded hospitals.

The development agreement between the city and Stanford specifies that the $2.25 million must be used for "improvements to enhance the pedestrian and bicycle connection" from the transit center to the intersection of El Camino Real and Quarry Road.

Staff is recommending the city use $250,000 from this account to hire an architect, a site planner and an urban designer to evaluate the new proposal and to launch the necessary environmental analyses, including a traffic study, an arborist report, a storm-water-management plan, a sanitary-sewer study and a storm-drain analysis.

The studies would be the first of many planning steps Palo Alto officials would take to assess and possibly approve the project. According to Emslie's report, the city would probably need to rezone the property to accommodate the new office building; change the Comprehensive Plan, Palo Alto's land-use bible; and prepare an environmental-impact report, a comprehensive analysis of the project's potential impacts and steps needed to compensate for those consequences. Voters may also be asked to "undedicate" a driveway next to El Camino Park that is currently dedicated parkland.

These steps would be undertaken upon submittal of the formal application for this project, according to Emslie.

If the city were to proceed with the project, it would be the second major office development to make its way toward the area around the downtown Caltrain station. The city's Planning and Transportation Commission recently approved a zone change to enable the construction of a five-story building at the intersection of Lytton Avenue and Alma Street. The "Lytton Gateway" development, much like the new proposal, is an example of the city's recent drive to promote dense, mixed-use development near major transit areas -- a key tenet of what is known as New Urbanism.

"The project presents a unique opportunity to create an attractive, vibrant urban destination and identity for people arriving by transit to Palo Alto, one that complements the scale and character of downtown and enhances connectivity to downtown and Stanford," Emslie wrote in the report.

Comments

varsity theater lover
Old Palo Alto
on Mar 2, 2012 at 3:46 pm
varsity theater lover, Old Palo Alto
on Mar 2, 2012 at 3:46 pm

If he wants a downtown theater, why doesn't he renovate the existing (and abandoned) Varsity Theater building? That's a perfect location for a theater, with easy access from most parts of town and it is close to restaurants for people who want to have a meal before the show. The MacArthur Park is difficult to reach if you're coming from east of the train tracks.


Bob
Community Center
on Mar 2, 2012 at 4:09 pm
Bob, Community Center
on Mar 2, 2012 at 4:09 pm

Would performances be stopped while HSR zooms by? - any rail activity, for that matter. Unless the cancellation of HSR is a 'done deal', prudence requires looking ahead 'down the track'.


Deep Throat
another community
on Mar 2, 2012 at 4:29 pm
Deep Throat, another community
on Mar 2, 2012 at 4:29 pm

The performances won't stop while the High Speed Train zooms by, because the office building and theater will be more valuable when Stanford and Arrillaga get every High Speed Train to stop at the Palo Alto Caltrain station.


Howard
Crescent Park
on Mar 2, 2012 at 4:57 pm
Howard, Crescent Park
on Mar 2, 2012 at 4:57 pm

There is no concern about a high speed rail or any other rail transport passing near a properly built theatre. Lincon Center and Carnegie Hall are on top of subways.

It would be nice if the Varsity Theatre could be restored to its former glory, but the McArthur Park site is a better location for a Class A performing arts center.


Another-Bad-Idea
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 2, 2012 at 5:42 pm
Another-Bad-Idea, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 2, 2012 at 5:42 pm

> but the McArthur Park site is a better location for a Class A
> performing arts center.

Stanford is opening the Bing Hall:
Web Link

Ennead Architects of New York City designed the $112 million venue, with acoustic design by the acoustician Yasuhisa Toyota of Nagata Acoustics in Tokyo, and theatrical design by Fisher Dachs Associates of New York, Seattle and the United Kingdom.
--
And the PAUSD is planning to put 50M taxpayers dollars into a theater half a mile away from this location.

Just how many theaters does Palo Alto need? Just how many theaters can the aging population of Palo Alto actually keep in business?

This is another bad idea brought to us by Daddy Warkbucks.

And just were in Palo Alto would the McArthur Park building be moved? Would it still be a restaurant, or would it fall idle, and then end up being another unused building on the City's Historic Building inventory?

No, No, No!


Crescent park neighbor
Crescent Park
on Mar 2, 2012 at 7:00 pm
Crescent park neighbor, Crescent Park
on Mar 2, 2012 at 7:00 pm

What about putting an underground parking lot under the old borders building and making that the theater?


VoxPop
Old Palo Alto
on Mar 2, 2012 at 8:53 pm
VoxPop, Old Palo Alto
on Mar 2, 2012 at 8:53 pm

There are only so many touring acts, and only so many stops in the Bay Area they are willing to make on any one tour. They would rather not play to partially filled houses.

Doesn't make much sense to me.


Marilyn
Meadow Park
on Mar 3, 2012 at 8:22 am
Marilyn, Meadow Park
on Mar 3, 2012 at 8:22 am

The MacArthur Park site is a wonderful location for something really good. John Arrillaga offering to do something on Stanford land is a great start. I'm looking forward to more details as this proposal evolves through the Palo Alto Process.


Marianne
Downtown North
on Mar 3, 2012 at 12:09 pm
Marianne, Downtown North
on Mar 3, 2012 at 12:09 pm

This sound sooooo exciting!!!


Judy H
Menlo Park
on Mar 4, 2012 at 2:31 pm
Judy H, Menlo Park
on Mar 4, 2012 at 2:31 pm

Sounds like a wonderful addition to the community! That area can benefit from a vibrant new look more reflective of the region's energy, innovation and charm. And a theater will be a great asset.


Marilyn
Meadow Park
on Mar 4, 2012 at 4:09 pm
Marilyn, Meadow Park
on Mar 4, 2012 at 4:09 pm

Over more than 20 years, philanthropist John Arrillaga has quietly become the area's #1 local benefactor. To date, most of his major capital contributions have sprouted results for Stanford athletics.

The proposed Palo Alto theater project could re-energize individual largess exhibited in decades past by civic leaders like Lucie Stern and Elizabeth Gamble.

John is among maybe a thousand who reaped big rewards from investing in a blossoming Silicon Valley.

Yet recently, he stands nearly alone among locals in 'giving back to the community' by making significant projects, beyond the capabilities of cities or universities, possible.

Here's hoping John's largess blazes the trail for others to follow his lead.


Great Idea!
Barron Park
on Mar 4, 2012 at 8:51 pm
Great Idea!, Barron Park
on Mar 4, 2012 at 8:51 pm

This is just brilliant. I am sure that the city will look this gift horse in the mouth and there will be plenty of residents who will help them do this. However, the mindset should be to always keep in mind that this will be GREAT for the quality of life in our town. It will also take years to ge this going, but I can't remember being more excited about a city project. Let's expedite this!


Steve Rock
Meadow Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:18 am
Steve Rock, Meadow Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:18 am

What I think is needed is a theater the size of Memorial Auditorium. That theater has terrible sight lines for dance performances. The other performance places nearby, including the new one on Campus, are much smaller and thus unsuitable for groups which attract a very large audience. I do not remember how many people the New Varsity held.


Anon.
Crescent Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:35 am
Anon., Crescent Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:35 am

What about parking for this thing? The Varsity theater, which I guess has already been spoken for would be a much nicer theater and dinner place.

The closeness to the railroad, the lack of parking, the difficulty in driving in the area and the inconvenience while they are building such a huge place right on the end of University seems like this is a bad idea.

Get rid of the airport and put it out by the baylands to start some recreational development out there for a change.


Theater lover
Los Altos Hills
on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:37 am
Theater lover, Los Altos Hills
on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:37 am

Bing hall is a music hall, not a theater. It would be great to have Theaterworks have a permanent home! They bring a lot of revenue to Mountain View and Lucy Stern Theater is so old and uncomfortable (especially in the summer) that I could really see this being used extensively.


Barbara
Downtown North
on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:57 am
Barbara, Downtown North
on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:57 am

What a great idea! Super spot for a state-of-the-art live theatre! Yes, let's go for it. . .


Dick Maser
Crescent Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:25 am
Dick Maser, Crescent Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:25 am

Julia Morgan, architect for Hearst Castle, designed MacArthur Park; it is a P. A. landmark, and should be preserved on its present site. Perhaps we should move the Stanford Stadium to make room for this development!!


Arch Conservative
Menlo Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:25 am
Arch Conservative, Menlo Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:25 am

The smartest thng to do- and I know that it won't be done, because Palo Alto is Palo Alto- is to have the powers that be, just step aside and let John do it! Without any "guidance or commnunity input". Based on past history, John will get it done on time, under budget- and do it right. If the City "helps or guides", it will ba a disaster.
Menlo Park let John do the Burgess Park Center and it was a rousing success. Please learn from that. The Stanford Stadium is another wonderful example.

Thank you John, for making this a better place.


Richard Placone
Barron Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:30 am
Richard Placone, Barron Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:30 am

People commenting should carefully read the article first. This project includes a three lever underground parking garage.

I will be in favor of this project if this means two things: 1) TheaterWorks will use it for its Palo Alto appearances (I assume they will divide venues between this place and the Mt View Performing Arts Center. We currently avoid those performances held in Lucie Stern.)
2) The Lucie Stern Center will become some useful site for other city government services, hopefully requiring less leased space, thereby saving money, and allowing the Children's Theater project be relocated to the new facility with the city dropping is financial support, saving about a million dollars a year in subsidies.


Crescent Park Dad
Crescent Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:43 am
Crescent Park Dad, Crescent Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:43 am

As posters above have noted:

New Bing theater coming.
New Paly theater coming.
Existing Lucie Stern.
Existing (former) Varsity theater up for sale/renovation.

Why not take over Varsity instead?


palo alto mom
Duveneck/St. Francis
on Mar 5, 2012 at 12:03 pm
palo alto mom, Duveneck/St. Francis
on Mar 5, 2012 at 12:03 pm

If this gets built, we don't need a new theater at Paly - two theaters within a mile or so of each other.


HSR doesn't plan to stop in Palo Alto
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 5, 2012 at 12:04 pm
HSR doesn't plan to stop in Palo Alto, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 5, 2012 at 12:04 pm

Ummmm. High Speed Rail Authority has already decided there will be no HSR stop in Palo Alto. We get the impacts but no improvement in local service. I know local people WANT it, but it is not in the plans.

Pay attention to the details. They matter.


Paly mom
Old Palo Alto
on Mar 5, 2012 at 2:39 pm
Paly mom, Old Palo Alto
on Mar 5, 2012 at 2:39 pm

Paly and TheatreWorks informally discussed the idea of sharing a theatre, but realized that between classes, rehearsals, instrumental and choir performances, and theatrical performances, the Paly theatre would be fully booked. Summer rentals (as with Haymarket currently) will be utilized. TheatreWorks needs its own home for all of its 8 main stage rehearsals and performances, its classes, workshops, and new works festival. This has been a dream of TheatreWorks for many years.

The gift from Arrillaga is phenomenal! Thank you John for supporting our community!


thanks but
Downtown North
on Mar 5, 2012 at 4:34 pm
thanks but, Downtown North
on Mar 5, 2012 at 4:34 pm

yes he is generous
but:
how many perf arts theatres can we accommodate ?
and where will this historic bldg by the FIRST LICENSED FEMALE architect in CA be moved to??????


Marcie
Barron Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 5:37 pm
Marcie, Barron Park
on Mar 5, 2012 at 5:37 pm

How come no mention is made of where they plan to move the existing building? Personally I abhor these large buildings that Palo Alto is approving.


VoxPop
Old Palo Alto
on Mar 5, 2012 at 8:30 pm
VoxPop, Old Palo Alto
on Mar 5, 2012 at 8:30 pm

I'm confused. I didn't see anything in the article about Mr. Arrilaga donating anything, as some people seem to assume. This is a proposal for a commercial development, not a philanthropic project.


stretch
another community
on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:20 pm
stretch, another community
on Mar 5, 2012 at 10:20 pm

What a stupid idea!


Mark Weiss
Downtown North
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:15 pm
Mark Weiss, Downtown North
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:15 pm

Karen Holman said she read all these comments before tonights meeting but I would not consider that public input compared to the access Arrillaga has to council (which was alluded to but not explained, how he pre-sold council on this).

This is a paraphrase of questions Bob Moss and Herb Burok raised at council tonight, plus my own spin:

So you are going to take $250,000 of the money Stanford is giving us for approving the $5 billion Hospital "renewal" {expansion} and give it to billionaire John Arrillaga to subsidize his theatre-plus-three-floors-of-parking-underground-plus 250,000-feet-of-office-space nine story zoning be damned, move Red Cross and historic restaurant and pipe dream of a building, as a kickback, to save him from doing his own study?

Council: 7-0 in favor with Yeh fortuitously on junket to Japan Sister City. And Klein abstaining, due to a conflict.

Pat Burt: We are taking the lead here, at least that's what Mr. Arrillaga told me to say tonight. (that's a paraphrase, or what I thought I heard -- check the record)

There goes the neighborhood, indeed. There goes Democracy. Does PA mean Palo Alto or Perry-Arrillaga?

Another funny thing here: when I asked staff to see the report (or are there two?) that Richard James I recall telling me about, apropos of my initiative to revive the Varsity, staff said they could not find it. But when three or four of the local press are pre-selling the public on an Arrillaga project, they reference the reports as some kind of precedent. What I actually think the report says is that Palo Alto opted out of what became Bing. (I remember being appalled we spent $200,000 on a study of the arts rather than on arts per se).


Initially I was psyched about this because it dovetails with my work regarding 456 University. But this is so slimy and nutty that it gags me.

Gail, Karen, Greg Schmid et al will have to sell me on this. But at first glance it reminds me of Hamlet Iv: something rotten in state of Denmark.


Mark Weiss
Downtown North
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:25 pm
Mark Weiss, Downtown North
on Mar 5, 2012 at 11:25 pm

Let me break this down again: what I heard Steve Emslie say is that the project would include 250,000 square feet of office space. So Philanthropist John is saying is "I will build you a theatre shell (which Theatreworks would pay for the interior of the shell), if you let me build $250 million in office space (worth $1,000/ sq foot or so). It's more trojan horse than gift horse in mouth.

But good job not giving him the rest of the $2.5 million, council and staff.


Moncolonel
Old Palo Alto
on Mar 6, 2012 at 1:44 pm
Moncolonel, Old Palo Alto
on Mar 6, 2012 at 1:44 pm

Hmmm...I'm thinking this is a huge benefit to MacArthur Park. The building is large and cavernous for a resturant. The restaurant has gone downhill of recent and this may pave the way for the 'new' MacArthur Park. What if the place goes belly-up before all this? Or goes belly-up after it's moved. We are talking about a restaurant here and University Avenue is not available.I'd be in favor of incorporating the building at 27 University Ave in this plan, downsizing the restaurant and add in something historical such as a museum or arts exhibit (arts as in all types). Or buy the owners out and close the place / use the space for a gateway. I don't know - can half the building be moved and the other half left there?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.