Seeking to accommodate a ballooning student population, Palo Alto officials swiftly and enthusiastically approved on Monday night the establishment of a new day care center near the Baylands.
The council voted 8-0, with Vice Mayor Greg Scharff absent, to approve the conversion of a vacant building on East Bayshore Road into the city's newest day care facility, one that would accommodate 117 children. It would be operated by Mustard Seed, a day care center that has been offering bilingual education in English and Chinese to young students for the past 20 years. The center is currently based at Emerson School on West Bayshore Road, less than a mile away from the new site.
"It's very clear we need quality child care in this community," said Councilwoman Gail Price, who proposed approving the new facility.
The council voted to support the new location for a day care center after hearing from about a dozen parents and students, all of whom praised Mustard Seed and stressed the need for more space. The demand is being driven by both a growing number of students in Palo Alto and the city's rising Asian population.
According to the city's draft Housing Element, the number of preschool children (aged 5 and under) in Palo Alto has jumped by 29 percent between 2000 and 2008. The number of school-age children (ages 5 to 17) went up by 17 percent during the same period.
"It's been kind of crowded with new people joining and I think the new building would really help us," said student Amelia Mao, echoing the sentiments of many of her peers at the meeting.
David Ng, whose daughter has been attending Mustard Seed for two years, also urged the council to approve the new use for the property at 2585 East Bayshore Road. Though the building would remain largely unchanged, the property would be equipped with a play area, new fencing, a handicap ramp and new parking stalls in the front lot.
"The larger play area and facility will allow more space for these kids," Ng said. "This center has grown dramatically, as the children and parents have been talking about. They actually need this facility."
Not everyone, however, is happy about the new proposal. Neighbors of the new day care center have expressed concerns at prior hearings about the new facility's potential traffic impacts, particularly during drop-off and pick-up times. The building shares an entrance driveway with 2595 East Bayshore Road and neighbors have argued that the new day care center would lead to cars queuing up at the property, creating congestion. Several of them reiterated these points Monday night.
Yates McKenzie, who represents the owner of 2595 East Bayshore, urged the council to scale down the project. Traffic impacts could prompt the property owners to resort to a civil lawsuit to remedy the situation, something that McKenzie said critics don't want to do.
"We'd much prefer if the City Council perhaps limit the number of students who can be served at the day care center."
The council's vote followed prior endorsements from the Architectural Review Board and the Planning and Transportation Commission, both of which approved the project with no dissent. City staff and traffic consultants had concluded that the project would not bring with it significant traffic impacts.
The council, in approving the project, also directed staff to address potential traffic backups by evaluating conditions and, if necessary, pursuing solutions such as staggered pickup schedules. This idea, pitched by Councilwoman Karen Holman, met opposition from Mayor Yiaway Yeh, Councilman Larry Klein and Councilwoman Nancy Shepherd, all of whom argued that the city should not be thrust into the role of an enforcer over a neighbor dispute. The rest of the council sided with Holman and voted 5-3 to support her amendment.
The council was unanimous, however, in its position that the city desperately needs more day care facilities.
"I think this is a use that meets a community need and, in general, this is a location that is appropriate for it," Councilman Pat Burt said.
Comments
South of Midtown
on Apr 10, 2012 at 9:19 am
on Apr 10, 2012 at 9:19 am
Congratulations Mustard Seed! Lets show our new neighbors that we can share a common drive way with no problems! At the end they will not mind having Mustard Seed around.
Actually the pick up time for parents will be between 5:00 and 6:oo PM only! Early in the afternoon, Mustard Seed drivers bring the children in carpools from the various schools in Palo Alto to the center. No need to fuss for one busy hour a day.
We teach our children the importance of sharing for the well being of the community. So, we adults, lets teach them with real examples on how to handle shared space cordially!
Palo Verde
on Apr 10, 2012 at 11:12 am
on Apr 10, 2012 at 11:12 am
Is this being placed directly at the choke-point for access to our sprawling new brightly lit auto mall and amenities proposed for hundreds of acres into the bay? Maybe we should have Caltrans install another interchange, the four-level type.
Midtown
on Apr 10, 2012 at 1:26 pm
on Apr 10, 2012 at 1:26 pm
A daycare facility needs enough KIDS to make it profitable. If not, it won't work. Hope it does work though.
Evergreen Park
on Apr 10, 2012 at 2:05 pm
on Apr 10, 2012 at 2:05 pm
will the city subsidize this new day care center? Or is this just a change of zoning to allow a day care center at this site?
South of Midtown
on Apr 10, 2012 at 2:19 pm
on Apr 10, 2012 at 2:19 pm
Watching 4 and 5 year olds speaking to the citycouncil was inappropriate, and painful to watch.
And the hovering mommies helping them made it worse. Helicoptering parents begin in nursery school. Very unattractive.
Midtown
on Apr 10, 2012 at 4:35 pm
on Apr 10, 2012 at 4:35 pm
Helicopter, are you suggesting children should not voice their opinions? If they wanted to, shouldn't they be allowed regardless of the situation?
We should see this as an act of bravery - it took a lot of courage for them to get up to the podium! Not many adults will even do it. The little girl who was a 1st grader wanted to speak but she simply wanted her mom next to her. Why was it painful for you to watch?
I thought the public hearing welcomed anyone to speak. Wouldn't that include children as well? After all, they're the very people who would be using this facility. Shouldn't they be heard?
South of Midtown
on Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 pm
on Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35 pm
Little children repeat what they hear at home. No, little children do not vote and do not pay taxes and do not understand the issues taken up at a government meeting. They are cute but it is inappropriate and a waste of everyone's time for them to participate in adult matters.
You really think little children wanted to address the City Council? or even know what a City Council is? Get real.
Stanford
on Apr 11, 2012 at 5:04 am
on Apr 11, 2012 at 5:04 am
Amen, Helicopter parents.
I could take my cat to a City Council meeting and urge her to meow her views on the P.A. Humane Society debate, but it would not be appropriate, as much as she hopes the Humane Society will stay put (and be improved).
Midtown
on Apr 11, 2012 at 7:09 am
on Apr 11, 2012 at 7:09 am
The littlest speaker is 7 years old. She is old enough to understand that she would like a bigger facility. City council did not set an age limit on speakers. Maybe you should go complain to the city council that children's voices should not be heard instead of hiding behind this blog.
Hoover School
on Jan 16, 2013 at 8:26 pm
on Jan 16, 2013 at 8:26 pm
This school has way too many children. About 170. It does not have enough study desks and study chairs for kids. Most of the time Kids end up sit on the floor do nothing between 5:00pn---5:50pm.