California dreamin'
Palo Alto's effort to reinvigorate the charming but neglected commercial strip of California Avenue sped ahead this year despite speed bumps of opposition from area merchants. Opponents' top concern remains the city's plan to reduce lanes on California Avenue, giving it the configuration (and, officials hope, the character) of downtown's University Avenue or Mountain View's Castro Street. This year, the city made the already dramatic streetscape project even more so when it agreed to expand sidewalks and create flexible plazas near the Caltrain station and on the block between Ash and Birch streets. With the design work largely completed, the city is looking to begin construction in fall 2013.
A new gateway
The idea of building dense, tall developments near transit stations has long been a central tenet of New Urbanism. This year, Palo Alto officials doubled down on the idea of "transit-oriented developments" when they approved Lytton Gateway. The four-story project will occupy the prominent intersection of Lytton Avenue and Alma Street, a stone's throw from the downtown Caltrain station. The council approved the proposed project after intense negotiations with developer Boyd Smith and his group and after a wave of concern from Downtown North residents about the project's impact on parking. As part of the compromise, the City Council asked the developers to reduce the number of stories from five to four and to fund a study that will assess downtown's complex parking situation.
Plugging in Caltrain
In the four years since California voters approved a $9.95 billion bond to build the nation's first high-speed-rail system, the project has quickly transformed in the eyes of local officials from the great progressive hope to a $68 billion lemon. This year, however, legislators were able to squeeze some lemonade out of the mammoth endeavor. When the State Senate approved in July funding for the first segment of construction in Central Valley, the approval included a gift for the Peninsula -- about $750 million for the long-awaited electrification of Caltrain. The electrification project, which Caltrain has been coveting for more than a decade, is still years away, but with the state funding secured, there is finally hope that the popular but cash-strapped commuter service will soon reach its goals of modern trains and financial soundness.
Calming the creek
Fourteen years ago, water from the San Francisquito Creek spilled over local bridges, causing millions of dollars in flood damage to Palo Alto, East Palo Alto and Menlo Park. After more than a decade with virtually no progress, officials from the three cities this year approved a major flood-control effort aimed at protecting the particularly vulnerable area downstream of the fickle creek, between U.S. Highway 101 and the San Francisco Bay. But the project -- which includes rebuilt levees, an upgraded bridge, a widened channel, and a completely reconfigured Palo Alto Municipal Golf Course -- does much more than just offer flood protection from the creek. The San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority, which is spearheading this effort, is also using the opportunity to protect the area from possible sea-level rise related to climate change.
The new chapter
Construction of Palo Alto's new Mitchell Park Library and Community Center didn't exactly proceed by the book. The most conspicuous and expensive project in the $76 million bond that Palo Alto voters approved in 2008 suffered a series of setbacks -- from missing details in architectural plans to construction delays in waterproofing the building -- driving up costs and pushing the target date forward by a year. Even so, by the end of 2012 most of the work on the new buildings has already been completed, giving residents in south Palo Alto much to look forward to in spring of 2013, when the buildings are scheduled to open.
Comments
Mountain View
on Dec 30, 2012 at 2:10 pm
on Dec 30, 2012 at 2:10 pm
how about projects to become a down-to-earth city? philanthropy to help the down and outers and less fortunate. palo alto is not what it once was. get off of your high horse and address the downcast and regular people. palo alto is not shangri-la. it's just a place that is somewhere and it is somehow. wake up everyone
Palo Verde
on Dec 31, 2012 at 7:32 am
on Dec 31, 2012 at 7:32 am
That Mitchell Park Library is an abomination.
It has absolutely NO connection to the park or surrounding residential neighborhood. The massing and materials of construction are totally inappropriate and should be a loud embarrassment for the Architectural Review Board.
While I can appreciate that the ARB is a volunteer board...they need to go. Let's count the community disappointments that this ARB has hoisted upon:
1. Mitchell Park Library - Disaster
2. Alma Plaza - TOTAL Disaster
3. JCC - Massive Disaster
4. "Gateway" - Horror on Alama (only second to Alma Plaza)
5. Housing at Alma/Homer
Please!Thank you for your time and effort,now please just move on.
This insane urbanization theory the ARB is enamored with is an unmitigated disaster for the City. We DON'T WANT BUILDINGS PUSHED TO THE CURB...we like our set-backs. We don't want towering slabs of stucco hanging over the street.
Barron Park
on Dec 31, 2012 at 7:47 am
on Dec 31, 2012 at 7:47 am
More whining about the JCC. Thank god it was built, otherwise the chronic malcontents in the city would have nothing to whine about!
Palo Verde
on Dec 31, 2012 at 8:00 am
on Dec 31, 2012 at 8:00 am
Love the JCC...
Please don't confuse my love and admiration for the programs and facilities housed within the project for my criticism of the ARB's roll in the project design. The JCC is a wonderful addition to our neighborhood that I regularly enjoy.
My assignment of fault is with the architecture which has created a fortress against the neighborhood. This is a direct result of this ARB insisting that he projects be pushed to the absolute edge of the property and that public space be located within the center of site.
For the JCC site this philosophy resulted in those god awful interior concrete deserts and a buildings that feel like they will fall onto Charleston or San Antonio. Its an urban fortress as uninviting and intimidating to a pedestrian as can be conceived. Epic architectural fail. Made more so by the absolutely wonderful programs and facilities it houses.
Alama Plaza stinks too. Who asked for this slab sided monstrosity to be placed right at the property line along Alma. NOT THE DEVELOPER! It is a huge insult to our pedestrian scale neighborhood and directly the result of this ARB's misguided urbanization philosophy that builds forts against the street and insists on minimal public space on the interior.
This ARB needs to retire. Please...Save Our Sidewalks!
Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Dec 31, 2012 at 10:51 am
on Dec 31, 2012 at 10:51 am
Couldn't agree more about these new "Urban" designs -- people don't live in Palo Alto to be urban. We're a small-town suburb, with people who, for the most part, value the small town feel and a sense of neighborhood. Excessive high-density housing and lack of set-back decrease both. The large, at-the-curb projects are a fad some planners describe as "progress". They are anything but.
Palo Verde
on Dec 31, 2012 at 11:18 am
on Dec 31, 2012 at 11:18 am
Regarding San Fransquito Creek the flood control effort needs to focus on cleaning out the excess vegetation from 101 West. I observed banks of dead vegetation, broken tree limbs, and in general a vegetation mess within the creek boundaries. Adobe Creek was cleaned out in autumn to improve flood control. San Fransquito Creek has a different set of problems but the creek can be cleaned up to remove excess dead vegetation. What is happening is dead vegetation is moving down from Stanford and compacting the ability to clear water. This needs to be a joint venture with Stanford since the creek is part of the border to Stanford property. Both entities have the manpower and equipment to do this job - and the city has $90K for consultants to apply to this effort. If the city is claiming that is has no budget for creek maintenance then it has no budget for consultants.
Green Acres
on Jan 2, 2013 at 10:47 am
on Jan 2, 2013 at 10:47 am
The damage of our town has and is being done as you read this............
How about a few suggestions instead of insults! Ideas, anyone???!!
QUESTION:
Who knows the name of the person who has a placq at the end of California Ave, right by the fountain in front of the bench??? That dedicated item was decorated at Christmas time for a local man...who loved California Avenue...........
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 3, 2013 at 1:04 pm
on Jan 3, 2013 at 1:04 pm
@What?
Totally with you about the setbacks and urbanization of our town. You forgot to add the school construction choices, which not only make for more urban, impersonal, larger schools, but cost a lot more for what we get.