News

Council looks to swear in new members earlier

Two Palo Alto councilmen warn of 'legal and practical problems' under current system

Seeking to solve what they call "legal and practical problems," two members of the Palo Alto City Council are urging their colleagues to be more expedient in swearing in newly elected members.

In a colleagues' memo released Wednesday, Councilmen Larry Klein and Greg Schmid have proposed changing the swear-in date for new council members from the first Monday in January – as is the current practice – to the first business day. The memo notes that when the mayor is a departing council member (as Yiaway Yeh was in 2012), his or her term expires on Dec. 31. If both the mayor and vice mayor are departing council members, there would be no one left to lead the council's "reorganizational meeting." At that meeting, which occurs on the first Monday of January, new members are sworn in and the new mayor and vice mayor are chosen.

Klein and Schmid note that by delaying the swearing-in ceremony until possibly as late as Jan. 8, the council runs "the risk of not having sufficient council members on hand to act if an emergency should arise."

They also note that the current practice of waiting until the first Monday of the month to swear in the new members results in a waste of time and delays the mayor's ability to make committee appointments. With the first Monday of January dedicated to the reorganization meeting and the third Monday being Martin Luther King Jr. Day, the council leaves itself with only two (possibly three, when there are five Mondays) business meetings in the fist month of the year.

"At the very time when enthusiasm is high – particularly in years when new people are joining the council – we in effect are dawdling," Klein and Schmid wrote. "Please join us in supporting this simple change in our schedule."

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

If adopted, the shift would be one of several procedural changes the council is pursuing this year. New Mayor Greg Scharff has emphasized ending meetings before 11 p.m. (a rarity in recent years) and has been urging colleagues, at times brusquely, to wrap up their comments if they stray off topic. The agenda also now includes the estimated time each item is expected to take.

The council is scheduled to discuss subjects such as meeting length and other procedural matters at its annual retreat, which will begin at 8:30 a.m. on Saturday, Feb. 2, at the Palo Alto Art Center, 1313 Newell Road.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Council looks to swear in new members earlier

Two Palo Alto councilmen warn of 'legal and practical problems' under current system

Seeking to solve what they call "legal and practical problems," two members of the Palo Alto City Council are urging their colleagues to be more expedient in swearing in newly elected members.

In a colleagues' memo released Wednesday, Councilmen Larry Klein and Greg Schmid have proposed changing the swear-in date for new council members from the first Monday in January – as is the current practice – to the first business day. The memo notes that when the mayor is a departing council member (as Yiaway Yeh was in 2012), his or her term expires on Dec. 31. If both the mayor and vice mayor are departing council members, there would be no one left to lead the council's "reorganizational meeting." At that meeting, which occurs on the first Monday of January, new members are sworn in and the new mayor and vice mayor are chosen.

Klein and Schmid note that by delaying the swearing-in ceremony until possibly as late as Jan. 8, the council runs "the risk of not having sufficient council members on hand to act if an emergency should arise."

They also note that the current practice of waiting until the first Monday of the month to swear in the new members results in a waste of time and delays the mayor's ability to make committee appointments. With the first Monday of January dedicated to the reorganization meeting and the third Monday being Martin Luther King Jr. Day, the council leaves itself with only two (possibly three, when there are five Mondays) business meetings in the fist month of the year.

"At the very time when enthusiasm is high – particularly in years when new people are joining the council – we in effect are dawdling," Klein and Schmid wrote. "Please join us in supporting this simple change in our schedule."

If adopted, the shift would be one of several procedural changes the council is pursuing this year. New Mayor Greg Scharff has emphasized ending meetings before 11 p.m. (a rarity in recent years) and has been urging colleagues, at times brusquely, to wrap up their comments if they stray off topic. The agenda also now includes the estimated time each item is expected to take.

The council is scheduled to discuss subjects such as meeting length and other procedural matters at its annual retreat, which will begin at 8:30 a.m. on Saturday, Feb. 2, at the Palo Alto Art Center, 1313 Newell Road.

Comments

Angie Taylor
Old Palo Alto
on Jan 31, 2013 at 10:35 am
Angie Taylor, Old Palo Alto
on Jan 31, 2013 at 10:35 am

Why doesn't the city council reorganize in December? San Mateo County cities all do it at their December meeting. Seems silly to wait until January.


Wayne Martin
Fairmeadow
on Jan 31, 2013 at 12:01 pm
Wayne Martin, Fairmeadow
on Jan 31, 2013 at 12:01 pm

What about the so-called "Emergency Council"? They are permanently assigned, and would be available if needed. Shouldn't Klein/Schmidt consider their existence as a part of the "emergency scenario"?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.