News

Palo Alto releases salary data

Lower salaries, higher benefits keep total compensation relatively flat

The City of Palo Alto's payroll fell by 3 percent in 2012, though the rising costs of employee benefits kept the overall compensation level relatively steady.

The salary numbers, which the city released Thursday afternoon, show that public-safety officials are no longer dominating the list of highest paid employees as they had in years past. Whereas in 2011, 12 out of 15 top earners were from the Police or Fire departments (many of whom retired that year and "cashed out" unused vacation or holiday pay), in 2012, only six public-safety officials made the top 15. This year, the list of high earners featured more managers and department heads.

Fire Inspector John Parks led the way with $288,728 in total wages, including $115,400 in salary and $150,125 in overtime pay. He is followed on the high-earners lists by City Manager James Keene, who received $259,529 in total compensations (most of it is salary). Fire Captain Ryan Stoddard and Police Chief Dennis Burns were third and fourth, with total compensation of $224,883 and $223,004, respectively. City Attorney Molly Stump and Assistant City Manager Pamela Antil followed, with $221,492 and $220,639, respectively.

The list of employee salaries is now available on the city's Open Date site at http://paloalto.opendata.junar.com/dashboards/7917/finance.

The numbers illustrate the rising costs of employee benefits, which are keeping the city's total staff expenditures at about $100 million, despite a decreasing number of full-time positions. Since fiscal year 2010, the number of positions in the General Fund dropped from 705 to 655, according to the recently released City of Palo Alto Performance Report.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

The overall salaries and benefits totaled just over $99 million in 2012, a decrease from the 2011 level of $102.1 million, though the 2011 figure was somewhat inflated by the large number of "cash-out" payments to retiring employees.

According to David Ramberg, assistant director of Administrative Services Department, benefit costs have been increasing by 8 percent annually, even as the number of employees making more than $100,000 went down by six between 2011 and 2012.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Palo Alto releases salary data

Lower salaries, higher benefits keep total compensation relatively flat

The City of Palo Alto's payroll fell by 3 percent in 2012, though the rising costs of employee benefits kept the overall compensation level relatively steady.

The salary numbers, which the city released Thursday afternoon, show that public-safety officials are no longer dominating the list of highest paid employees as they had in years past. Whereas in 2011, 12 out of 15 top earners were from the Police or Fire departments (many of whom retired that year and "cashed out" unused vacation or holiday pay), in 2012, only six public-safety officials made the top 15. This year, the list of high earners featured more managers and department heads.

Fire Inspector John Parks led the way with $288,728 in total wages, including $115,400 in salary and $150,125 in overtime pay. He is followed on the high-earners lists by City Manager James Keene, who received $259,529 in total compensations (most of it is salary). Fire Captain Ryan Stoddard and Police Chief Dennis Burns were third and fourth, with total compensation of $224,883 and $223,004, respectively. City Attorney Molly Stump and Assistant City Manager Pamela Antil followed, with $221,492 and $220,639, respectively.

The list of employee salaries is now available on the city's Open Date site at http://paloalto.opendata.junar.com/dashboards/7917/finance.

The numbers illustrate the rising costs of employee benefits, which are keeping the city's total staff expenditures at about $100 million, despite a decreasing number of full-time positions. Since fiscal year 2010, the number of positions in the General Fund dropped from 705 to 655, according to the recently released City of Palo Alto Performance Report.

The overall salaries and benefits totaled just over $99 million in 2012, a decrease from the 2011 level of $102.1 million, though the 2011 figure was somewhat inflated by the large number of "cash-out" payments to retiring employees.

According to David Ramberg, assistant director of Administrative Services Department, benefit costs have been increasing by 8 percent annually, even as the number of employees making more than $100,000 went down by six between 2011 and 2012.

Comments

Joe
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 1, 2013 at 10:11 am
Joe, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 1, 2013 at 10:11 am

> Fire Inspector John Parks led the way with $288,728 in total
> wages, including $115,400 in salary and $150,125 in overtime pay.

Something is very wrong here--when an employee makes more in overtime than from his base salary.

And then there is the issue of what a Fire Inspector does that justifies this much overtime.

Can City Manager James Keene explain this? Or what about Mayor Greg Scharff? Does he have a clue why the City needs to pay an inspector more in overtime than in base salary?

Just another clear example of a local government that is out-of-control, and in need of an overhaul!


Leonard
Old Palo Alto
on Mar 1, 2013 at 12:45 pm
Leonard, Old Palo Alto
on Mar 1, 2013 at 12:45 pm

Sad part is the city will be "on the hook" to pay 90% of the employees salary when they retire, plus medical benefits. Insane!


Yikes!
Midtown
on Mar 1, 2013 at 1:08 pm
Yikes!, Midtown
on Mar 1, 2013 at 1:08 pm

Way TOO MUCH Over Time!!!!
We lose too much for the routine needs.


Jo Ann
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Mar 1, 2013 at 1:20 pm
Jo Ann, Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Mar 1, 2013 at 1:20 pm

Why do highly paid city employees even get over-time???


steve
Midtown
on Mar 1, 2013 at 1:27 pm
steve, Midtown
on Mar 1, 2013 at 1:27 pm

You people are incredible! The money has to go out somewhere....either in overtime or as a new employee. Lets put your " compensation" package up there as well. Leave our service members alone!


Wondering?
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 1, 2013 at 3:12 pm
Wondering?, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 1, 2013 at 3:12 pm

> The money has to go out somewhere

Are you for real? The cost of government during the Obama years has risen to about 50% of the GDP--driven in part by salaries/benefits of government sector workers that are too high, and these insane pensions.

If someone is making $115K in base salary, and $150K in overtime, that means he's working between 70 and 80 hours a week. How does anyone actually function after a couple of weeks--putting in those hours? Of course, maybe he really isn't putting in those hours, just claiming them?


Employee of software company
Charleston Meadows
on Mar 1, 2013 at 3:47 pm
Employee of software company, Charleston Meadows
on Mar 1, 2013 at 3:47 pm

> Lets put your " compensation" package up there as well.

WOW... Are you seriously thinking everybody is getting similar compensation? All my friends are getting 90K-145K with no overtime / bonuses/ etc. And with 10-25 years of experience...


Dan
Southgate
on Mar 1, 2013 at 4:01 pm
Dan, Southgate
on Mar 1, 2013 at 4:01 pm

Assuming our Fire Inspector gets time and a half for overtime, that comes out to 34.7 hours a week of OT every week of the year. Talk about milking it. How much OT does someone have to claim before there's an audit?


Midtown Resident
Midtown
on Mar 3, 2013 at 1:36 pm
Midtown Resident, Midtown
on Mar 3, 2013 at 1:36 pm

With A Master's degree in Math and a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering, and with 25years of experience I make 155k/year at a local high-tech company. And I have to pay my own 401K and work crazy hours. These salaries are WAY WAY too high.


Annoyed
another community
on Mar 3, 2013 at 2:45 pm
Annoyed, another community
on Mar 3, 2013 at 2:45 pm

So "midtown resident". Just because you have a job that pays less, it's thier fault. Oh....and who cares about your degrees?


Outside Observer
another community
on Mar 3, 2013 at 8:20 pm
Outside Observer, another community
on Mar 3, 2013 at 8:20 pm

Note to you techies that are making peanuts. Stop the H-1 Visas, and your salary and perks will improve. It's simple supply-and-demand.

With H-1 Visa's, they are doing to you what they did to all the trades with illegal aliens.


Midtown Resident
Midtown
on Mar 3, 2013 at 8:38 pm
Midtown Resident, Midtown
on Mar 3, 2013 at 8:38 pm

To Annoyed - [Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

We're all getting screwed paying ridiculous salaries that are not commensurate with what is paid in private industry simply because the unions blackmail the city into ridiculous deals. [Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

To "Outside Observer" - you're right. However since the republican supreme court has made money a fixture in politics, all the legislation is going to be in favour of moneyed interests. We just have to sit back and get shafted.


Outside Observer
another community
on Mar 3, 2013 at 11:23 pm
Outside Observer, another community
on Mar 3, 2013 at 11:23 pm

@ Midtown Resident,

It's not just the "republicans" or the "supreme court". Obama could effectively end H-1 Visa's just as he effectively implemented "The Dream Act". By executive order.

But he didn't.....


scooby
Palo Alto Hills
on Mar 4, 2013 at 10:48 am
scooby, Palo Alto Hills
on Mar 4, 2013 at 10:48 am

Our teachers, firefighters and police earn every penny and deserve it.


Midtown Resident
Midtown
on Mar 4, 2013 at 4:58 pm
Midtown Resident, Midtown
on Mar 4, 2013 at 4:58 pm

@Scooby. I'm all for paying everyone very well. However there is some point at which it becomes excessive. I'm happy to pay teachers and people who put their lives on the line every day, very well. However even there there are some abuses e.g. overtime, teachers unions that make it nearly impossible to fire them (If thats what you want, teachers, you must accept a lower payscale) that need to be curbed.

As for much of the city staff, much of what they do, does not require advanced degrees or the kind of crazy hours that are required in private industry. The benefits are also better. As a taxpayer, I'm not willing to shell out taxes for more than what is standard in private industry for a comparable job. And that calculation has to take into account total benefits including pension plans, vacation etc. I

f this does not happen I will vote no on every relevant local tax measure that comes my way.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.