Residents near the San Francisquito Creek received their latest wake-up call from the fickle creek on Dec. 23, when a heavy rain storm caused the creek to spill onto Highway 101 in East Palo Alto and nearly overflow the Pope-Chaucer Bridge in Palo Alto.
Now, officials from Palo Alto, East Palo Alto and Menlo Park are trying to make sure that the next rain storm will be more predictable.
On Monday night the Palo Alto City Council authorized a request from the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority (which includes the three cities and the water districts in Santa Clara and San Mateo counties) to apply for a grant that would pay for new gauges in the upper shed of the creek. If the grant is approved, the city would be able to significantly improve its flood-warning system, which currently includes the Creek Monitor web page. The page delivers real-time data on creek flows near bridges. It does not, however, measure the water level upstream.
The grant funds would be used to create what a report from the Public Works Department calls an "enhanced regional flood warning system" for the creek's watershed. The new equipment would be integrated with existing gauges into a "unified monitoring system" and would include "a robust communications system that will optimize the availability of the rainfall and stream flow data to emergency responders and the general public."
The new proposal is the latest in a series of steps that the creek authority is taking to improve flood control around the creek, which caused extensive property damage during a major storm in February 1998. Its most ambitious project to date centers on the particularly vulnerable area downstream, between the San Francisco Bay and U.S. Highway 101. It includes rebuilding levees, installing flood-walls and completely reconfiguring the Palo Alto Municipal Golf Course.
If the grant is approved, the creek authority hopes to have the flood-warning system in place before the 2013-14 winter-storm season, according to the Public Works report.
Comments
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 2, 2013 at 3:14 pm
on Apr 2, 2013 at 3:14 pm
Why are these three City governments looking for a grant for this new set of gauges--when there is clearly well over $200M in their combined General Funds?
Something is wrong here.
East Palo Alto
on Apr 2, 2013 at 5:06 pm
on Apr 2, 2013 at 5:06 pm
Good. Let's hope all goes quickly and smoothly.
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 2, 2013 at 5:09 pm
on Apr 2, 2013 at 5:09 pm
Thank you for reporting on this important news item.
I would like to know why you were able to report on the story about the rainbow flag on Monday evening at 11.30 and took until nearly 3.00 pm Tuesday to report on this?
Crescent Park
on Apr 3, 2013 at 8:24 am
on Apr 3, 2013 at 8:24 am
Measuring the rainfall in our watersheds coupled with modern computing and Internet techniques is a no-brainer. A several hour early flood warning is extremely valuable to our community.
I am relieved to see initiative being taken to make this happen before the next rainy season.
Crescent Park
on Apr 3, 2013 at 9:06 am
on Apr 3, 2013 at 9:06 am
A better warning system is a nice-to-have. What's really urgent here is reducing the flood risk by replacing Chaucer and Newell bridges and moving forward as quickly as possible with all the flood control at 101 bridge and East Palo Alto.
South of Midtown
on Apr 4, 2013 at 6:17 am
on Apr 4, 2013 at 6:17 am
What useful thing could anyone do with this data? By the time conditions for flooding are detected upstream, it's too late for residents or utility crews to take meaningful preventive steps in low lying areas, other than evacuation. No person has ever been hurt by San Francisquito floods, so current evacuation methods appear to work. With new sensors, property damage from floods is unchanged. This proposal would put pricy lipstick on a pig.
Crescent Park
on Apr 4, 2013 at 3:04 pm
on Apr 4, 2013 at 3:04 pm
HEY, I'll be your temporary flood warning system ... with just a few days of rain earlier this year the Chaucer street bridge backed up and jumped it's banks a little ...
SO ... why doesn't Palo Alto do something about that, instead of figuring out how to monitor something more snazzily since we have known was going to be a big expensive problem for over 10 years?
Crescent Park
on Jun 4, 2017 at 11:34 pm
on Jun 4, 2017 at 11:34 pm
Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?
Egan Middle School (Los Altos)
on Sep 26, 2017 at 9:37 am
on Sep 26, 2017 at 9:37 am
Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?