News

Hopes rekindled for new police building in Palo Alto

After earlier reservations, architects say Jay Paul's proposed public-safety building could work after all

Palo Alto's plan to build a new police headquarters at 3045 Park Blvd. roared back to life Tuesday afternoon, May 7, when city officials and their consulting architect announced a breakthrough in designing the proposed facility, which just three weeks ago was seen as highly unlikely to meet the needs of the Police Department.

Under the proposal that the City Council's Infrastructure Committee discussed Tuesday afternoon, the new police building would be constructed by the Jay Paul Company as a "public benefit" in exchange for the city's permission to construct two, four-story office buildings with 311,000 square feet of commercial space between them. The buildings would go up at 395 Page Mill Road, next to AOL's Silicon Valley headquarters.

Tuesday's discussion came just weeks after the Infrastructure Committee, composed of four council members, learned that the site proposed for the police building may not be operationally feasible. Police Chief Dennis Burns expressed concerns that the building was being "shoehorned" into a site that would not fit the department's needs. After expressing surprise at this development, committee members agreed at their April 16 meeting to invite the city's consulting architect, Michael Ross of the firm RossDrulisCusenberry Architecture, for a presentation on the project.

Since then, the project has taken an upswing. Staff from the city and from the Jay Paul company have been revising the proposed design to make it work for the department. Burns told the committee Tuesday that officials from the police, planning, public works and the city manager's departments have "invested a tremendous amount of time" on the project and have made "significant strides."

The biggest change in the new design is that the police building is now a distinct structure. Under the prior proposal, the police headquarters was attached to a garage that was shared by the department and the office workers. Now, the department would be housed in its own building, which would be equipped with parking spaces for police vehicles. On Tuesday, Burns lauded the progress that has been made and said the project now looks like it will work.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

"The building that we seek to build will meet the operational needs to serve the city for several decades," Burns said.

City Manager James Keene also voiced enthusiasm about the police building, which would replace the undersized and seismically unsafe facility at City Hall.

"We have a conclusion that a public-safety building can work on this site that is included in the proposal from the Jay Paul Company," Keene said.

The Jay Paul project, however, is far from a done deal. The council has yet to approve the development and the bulk of the environmental analysis for the giant development is just kicking off. The city expects to reach a decision on whether to approve the new office buildings next spring. At the same time, the Infrastructure Committee is exploring a possible bond measure for citywide infrastructure improvements that would be placed on the November 2014 ballot, an effort that could involve the police-building proposal.

The police headquarters is seen by the council as one of the most significant infrastructure needs in a city full of them. But Palo Alto's effort to build one has proved fruitless for more than a decade, with one proposal after another falling by the wayside. The most recent plan, which involved two Park Boulevard sites (not 3045 Park), collapsed in 2009 when the city opted to scrap its purchase option on the parcels.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Ross, who had been involved in Palo Alto's prior efforts to identify a suitable site for a new police headquarters, told the council Tuesday that he and Jay Paul's architect, Tom Gilman from the firm DES, have been working on a design that Ross believes "is really going to deliver a good public-safety building and a functional site to your town."

At the April 16 meeting, Ross said, there were still a lot of "loose ends' that needed to be tied up.

"We've taken the last two weeks to do that," Ross said.

Among the goals was making sure that the new public-safety building will be an "essential facility" capable of operating during a disaster and sufficient in size to accommodate all patrol vehicles.

"We wanted to have everything that is necessary for first-responder operations to be within this essential shell," Ross said.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

Council members praised the recent developments. Marc Berman said that while the prior presentation "might have given us a heart attack," the progress since then has been good. Berman, who served on the 17-member citizens' Infrastructure Blue Ribbon Commission that developed a comprehensive report on the city's needs, called a new police building "vitally important for the future of the city."

"I think the entire exercise adds a lot of value, in terms of our ability to comfortable move forward in knowing it's a sufficient site," Berman said.

Mayor Greg Scharff also praised the work of the various architects and staff members who contributed to the evolving design of the proposed public-safety buidling.

"I think the solution-oriented approach is really great to see -- when everyone works as a team and comes up with something that works well," Scharff said.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Hopes rekindled for new police building in Palo Alto

After earlier reservations, architects say Jay Paul's proposed public-safety building could work after all

Palo Alto's plan to build a new police headquarters at 3045 Park Blvd. roared back to life Tuesday afternoon, May 7, when city officials and their consulting architect announced a breakthrough in designing the proposed facility, which just three weeks ago was seen as highly unlikely to meet the needs of the Police Department.

Under the proposal that the City Council's Infrastructure Committee discussed Tuesday afternoon, the new police building would be constructed by the Jay Paul Company as a "public benefit" in exchange for the city's permission to construct two, four-story office buildings with 311,000 square feet of commercial space between them. The buildings would go up at 395 Page Mill Road, next to AOL's Silicon Valley headquarters.

Tuesday's discussion came just weeks after the Infrastructure Committee, composed of four council members, learned that the site proposed for the police building may not be operationally feasible. Police Chief Dennis Burns expressed concerns that the building was being "shoehorned" into a site that would not fit the department's needs. After expressing surprise at this development, committee members agreed at their April 16 meeting to invite the city's consulting architect, Michael Ross of the firm RossDrulisCusenberry Architecture, for a presentation on the project.

Since then, the project has taken an upswing. Staff from the city and from the Jay Paul company have been revising the proposed design to make it work for the department. Burns told the committee Tuesday that officials from the police, planning, public works and the city manager's departments have "invested a tremendous amount of time" on the project and have made "significant strides."

The biggest change in the new design is that the police building is now a distinct structure. Under the prior proposal, the police headquarters was attached to a garage that was shared by the department and the office workers. Now, the department would be housed in its own building, which would be equipped with parking spaces for police vehicles. On Tuesday, Burns lauded the progress that has been made and said the project now looks like it will work.

"The building that we seek to build will meet the operational needs to serve the city for several decades," Burns said.

City Manager James Keene also voiced enthusiasm about the police building, which would replace the undersized and seismically unsafe facility at City Hall.

"We have a conclusion that a public-safety building can work on this site that is included in the proposal from the Jay Paul Company," Keene said.

The Jay Paul project, however, is far from a done deal. The council has yet to approve the development and the bulk of the environmental analysis for the giant development is just kicking off. The city expects to reach a decision on whether to approve the new office buildings next spring. At the same time, the Infrastructure Committee is exploring a possible bond measure for citywide infrastructure improvements that would be placed on the November 2014 ballot, an effort that could involve the police-building proposal.

The police headquarters is seen by the council as one of the most significant infrastructure needs in a city full of them. But Palo Alto's effort to build one has proved fruitless for more than a decade, with one proposal after another falling by the wayside. The most recent plan, which involved two Park Boulevard sites (not 3045 Park), collapsed in 2009 when the city opted to scrap its purchase option on the parcels.

Ross, who had been involved in Palo Alto's prior efforts to identify a suitable site for a new police headquarters, told the council Tuesday that he and Jay Paul's architect, Tom Gilman from the firm DES, have been working on a design that Ross believes "is really going to deliver a good public-safety building and a functional site to your town."

At the April 16 meeting, Ross said, there were still a lot of "loose ends' that needed to be tied up.

"We've taken the last two weeks to do that," Ross said.

Among the goals was making sure that the new public-safety building will be an "essential facility" capable of operating during a disaster and sufficient in size to accommodate all patrol vehicles.

"We wanted to have everything that is necessary for first-responder operations to be within this essential shell," Ross said.

Council members praised the recent developments. Marc Berman said that while the prior presentation "might have given us a heart attack," the progress since then has been good. Berman, who served on the 17-member citizens' Infrastructure Blue Ribbon Commission that developed a comprehensive report on the city's needs, called a new police building "vitally important for the future of the city."

"I think the entire exercise adds a lot of value, in terms of our ability to comfortable move forward in knowing it's a sufficient site," Berman said.

Mayor Greg Scharff also praised the work of the various architects and staff members who contributed to the evolving design of the proposed public-safety buidling.

"I think the solution-oriented approach is really great to see -- when everyone works as a team and comes up with something that works well," Scharff said.

Comments

Lee
College Terrace
on May 7, 2013 at 10:46 pm
Lee, College Terrace
on May 7, 2013 at 10:46 pm

The current Police station is often cited as being seismically unsafe, and therefore, a new building needs to be built. This article is no exception. The current Police station occupies the ground floor of City Hall, if it is unsafe, how can the rest of the building above, be any safer? Why aren't all the other departments clamoring for seismically safe office space?

This development sounds almost too good to be true. That, combined with the fact that the police station is a so-called public benefit, leaves me wondering exactly what the city will get. Other public benefit concessions granted by city hall have amounted to; malformed car sculptures stuck around a doorway on Lytton, a bench on a corner by the hardware store, a wide sidewalk, uh, I mean 'public space' taken over by St Michaels Alley, another 'public space' taken over by another restaurant near California Avenue, and probably other similar examples. Considering all of these public benefit things have in my view been gag jokes handed over to the city in exchange for over sized developments, lets just say I'm dubious that the city will get the police station they think they might get.


Glass?
Adobe-Meadow
on May 8, 2013 at 12:59 pm
Glass?, Adobe-Meadow
on May 8, 2013 at 12:59 pm

By looking at the photos it looks like they want to build a police station with a mostly glass interior. I guess they would prefer it look pretty than actually be "defensible", a term they used three weeks ago as a mandatory parameter. Any nut can drive by and shoot into it, a bomb could explode and rain down shards of glass, etc. How about building something that protects the officers inside from the crazy people of this world?


musical
Palo Verde
on May 8, 2013 at 11:44 pm
musical, Palo Verde
on May 8, 2013 at 11:44 pm

Has anyone looked into the feasibility of a "rear entrance" connecting to Alma Street? Hollywood stunt drivers could probably get a police car across the tracks and through the chain link fence, but I'm thinking about something a little more civilized. Not for routine use, but in those scenarios when the department may want to serve us on the east side of the tracks while Oregon Expressway is under water or otherwise impassible.


Gus L.
Barron Park
on May 9, 2013 at 7:43 am
Gus L., Barron Park
on May 9, 2013 at 7:43 am

Keep the Tall buildings and Congestion Downtown where it belongs.
We don't need Massive buildings in an area that cant handle it.


resident
Fairmeadow
on May 9, 2013 at 11:11 pm
resident, Fairmeadow
on May 9, 2013 at 11:11 pm

That on-ramp from Park to Oregon eastbound is going to get even more crowded...


jan
Adobe-Meadow
on May 10, 2013 at 10:29 am
jan, Adobe-Meadow
on May 10, 2013 at 10:29 am

Lee, the pd bldg is not on the ground floor of city hall. They are two separate buildings attached by council chambers. Seriously? Why do people insist on commenting on things they know nothing about.


musical
Palo Verde
on May 10, 2013 at 10:46 am
musical, Palo Verde
on May 10, 2013 at 10:46 am

Hi jan, this is where us lazy people come to get educated. (And get our grammar corrected.)


Lee
College Terrace
on May 13, 2013 at 8:47 pm
Lee, College Terrace
on May 13, 2013 at 8:47 pm

wow! I goofed on what's on top of the police station, I goofed big time.

I still stand by my comments related to the 'free' police station though. The city has been duped, willingly or otherwise, repeatedly, into some really egregious over sized buildings in exchange for some really questionable, and mostly worthless 'public benefits'. Is there any chance it won't happen again?

Maybe the current police station was a free public benefit? How else could the city either buy or build a building that is apparently a seismic disaster waiting to happen, and right under/next their noses?

Jan, I really don't know why the city keeps making massive costly blunders, that's why I commented here. Do you know why the city keeps blundering with our tax dollars?


musical
Palo Verde
on May 13, 2013 at 10:13 pm
musical, Palo Verde
on May 13, 2013 at 10:13 pm

Do I want to hear opinions on the new Bay Bridge? Wait for HSR.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.