News

City set to bid for historic post office

City Council authorizes staff to submit an offer for Birge Clark building in downtown Palo Alto

The check isn't exactly in the mail, but Palo Alto took its first major move toward buying the Hamilton Avenue post office Monday night when the City Council agreed to make a bid for the historic and iconic building.

The council voted 7-0, with Councilman Pat Burt and Councilwoman Gail Price absent, to authorize staff to submit an offer for the 1932 building, which was designed by Birge Clark and which the U.S. Postal Service is looking to a sell as part of a nationwide plan to cut costs. The city has already commissioned an independent appraisal of the 380 Hamilton Ave. building, which the council discussed in a closed session last week.

On Monday, the council agreed that the downtown building is an important asset that should be preserved for public use if possible. And while members cautioned that purchase of the building is far from a done deal, they generally agreed that it would be a good deal for the city.

Staff had argued that buying the building would make financial sense because it would allow the city to stop leasing spaces outside City Hall for its operations. This includes the Development Center, the city's permitting operation, which operates out of a leased space in a building across the street from City Hall.

Under the staff proposal, the Development Center would be transferred to the post office, where it would potentially share space with the Planning Department and with a small postal-service retail operation.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

"This is a particularly valuable community asset," Planning Director Curtis Williams told the council Monday. "It provides not only the opportunity to preserve this historic treasure as well as provides us with some opportunities to consolidate some city functions and save money."

Though the city is keeping its appraisal confidential, Williams said the city's financial analyses shows that buying the post office "would be a profitable venture for the city over a 10- to 20-year time period, depending on what the purchase price is."

City officials aren't the only ones excited about the potential purchase. Beth Bunnenberg, a member of the city's Historic Resources Board, was one of several residents to speak out Monday in favor of the purchase.

"Please, please, please put in a bid for the Hamilton Avenue post office for the City of Palo Alto," Bunnenberg said. "This is an architectural gem at the heart of downtown. It's a meeting place where we see our friends and newcomers and all enjoy our beautiful lobby."

Douglas Graham, a Barron Park historian, voiced a similar sentiment and argued that buying the building is the best way to protect its historical integrity. Because the building is listed on the National Historic Registry, any purchase would have to include a historic covenant to ensure that any alterations would not interfere with the building's historical status.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

"I'm delighted that we have an opportunity to actually make productive use of this building and save some money for the city," Graham said. "I think it's a very appropriate use for the old building, and I'd feel much more secure in its safety and preservation if it were in public hands than in private."

Vice Mayor Nancy Shepherd, who made a motion to make a bid for the post office, called it a "jewel in our community."

"I think there is angst right now that we have that it's going to be listed commercially, and we will be in a contest with other people who will be bidding on it," Shepherd said. "But with the financial analysis shown us, having it pay back at most in 20 years, really makes this – I don't want to say a no-brainer – but certainly the most interesting proposition I've seen to get our planning department into a government building."

Councilwoman Liz Kniss agreed that the city should make a bid for the building, though she urged the community not to think of this as a done deal.

"We have to let the community know that this cannot be a fait accompli," Kniss said. "We're very interested in getting it, and we'll negotiate very well, but we cannot guarantee that we will be the ones to get it."

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

City set to bid for historic post office

City Council authorizes staff to submit an offer for Birge Clark building in downtown Palo Alto

The check isn't exactly in the mail, but Palo Alto took its first major move toward buying the Hamilton Avenue post office Monday night when the City Council agreed to make a bid for the historic and iconic building.

The council voted 7-0, with Councilman Pat Burt and Councilwoman Gail Price absent, to authorize staff to submit an offer for the 1932 building, which was designed by Birge Clark and which the U.S. Postal Service is looking to a sell as part of a nationwide plan to cut costs. The city has already commissioned an independent appraisal of the 380 Hamilton Ave. building, which the council discussed in a closed session last week.

On Monday, the council agreed that the downtown building is an important asset that should be preserved for public use if possible. And while members cautioned that purchase of the building is far from a done deal, they generally agreed that it would be a good deal for the city.

Staff had argued that buying the building would make financial sense because it would allow the city to stop leasing spaces outside City Hall for its operations. This includes the Development Center, the city's permitting operation, which operates out of a leased space in a building across the street from City Hall.

Under the staff proposal, the Development Center would be transferred to the post office, where it would potentially share space with the Planning Department and with a small postal-service retail operation.

"This is a particularly valuable community asset," Planning Director Curtis Williams told the council Monday. "It provides not only the opportunity to preserve this historic treasure as well as provides us with some opportunities to consolidate some city functions and save money."

Though the city is keeping its appraisal confidential, Williams said the city's financial analyses shows that buying the post office "would be a profitable venture for the city over a 10- to 20-year time period, depending on what the purchase price is."

City officials aren't the only ones excited about the potential purchase. Beth Bunnenberg, a member of the city's Historic Resources Board, was one of several residents to speak out Monday in favor of the purchase.

"Please, please, please put in a bid for the Hamilton Avenue post office for the City of Palo Alto," Bunnenberg said. "This is an architectural gem at the heart of downtown. It's a meeting place where we see our friends and newcomers and all enjoy our beautiful lobby."

Douglas Graham, a Barron Park historian, voiced a similar sentiment and argued that buying the building is the best way to protect its historical integrity. Because the building is listed on the National Historic Registry, any purchase would have to include a historic covenant to ensure that any alterations would not interfere with the building's historical status.

"I'm delighted that we have an opportunity to actually make productive use of this building and save some money for the city," Graham said. "I think it's a very appropriate use for the old building, and I'd feel much more secure in its safety and preservation if it were in public hands than in private."

Vice Mayor Nancy Shepherd, who made a motion to make a bid for the post office, called it a "jewel in our community."

"I think there is angst right now that we have that it's going to be listed commercially, and we will be in a contest with other people who will be bidding on it," Shepherd said. "But with the financial analysis shown us, having it pay back at most in 20 years, really makes this – I don't want to say a no-brainer – but certainly the most interesting proposition I've seen to get our planning department into a government building."

Councilwoman Liz Kniss agreed that the city should make a bid for the building, though she urged the community not to think of this as a done deal.

"We have to let the community know that this cannot be a fait accompli," Kniss said. "We're very interested in getting it, and we'll negotiate very well, but we cannot guarantee that we will be the ones to get it."

Comments

Elizabeth
Midtown
on May 21, 2013 at 10:22 am
Elizabeth, Midtown
on May 21, 2013 at 10:22 am

Finally the council is taking a step that I support. Is a new day dawning of intelligent action?

I definitely support the idea of the city purchasing this wonderful old building.

I'd like them to take it a step farther and truly make it a building available to the public.

I can't say that office space for city departments really meets that criteria. I'm sure that city employees don't want citizens traipsing through their offices.

It could be more accessible to the public if it was utilized for public engaging activities, like park and arts activities, classes, etc.

First steps first. Yes! Let's, as a population of citizens "represented" by the council, purchase this grand old building.


Annette
College Terrace
on May 21, 2013 at 10:36 am
Annette, College Terrace
on May 21, 2013 at 10:36 am

Agree with Elizabeth; hope the City is successful.


Kerry
Midtown
on May 21, 2013 at 10:47 am
Kerry, Midtown
on May 21, 2013 at 10:47 am

This is exactly the type of feel good nonsense that has put our city in fiscal trouble. Our infrastructure is behind the times; our unpaid benefits for city employees is a looming nightmare. Yet we continue to come up with these schemes.

Our city council is very weak, and they cannot seem to say "no" to pressure groups.


Helene
Midtown
on May 21, 2013 at 12:09 pm
Helene, Midtown
on May 21, 2013 at 12:09 pm

I think it is a great idea. However, have you ever entered the Post office during the winter months and been told by the postal workers they are freezing? I would imagine we will have to spend more money to upgrade the site. Something to consider.


Jim H.
Duveneck/St. Francis
on May 21, 2013 at 12:33 pm
Jim H., Duveneck/St. Francis
on May 21, 2013 at 12:33 pm

City continues to say we need a new public safety building. Now the city wants to buy a post office to go along with the abandoned medical center. Sell the Roth building, a d put all of the money towards a. We police building. Then move ALL of the planning department back to city hall and stop paying rent on the development office on Hamilton.
It's really hard to save money for needed things when you keep finding useless ways to spend it.


jake
Community Center
on May 21, 2013 at 1:11 pm
jake, Community Center
on May 21, 2013 at 1:11 pm

Yes It's really hard to figure out who is beneficial in the end of the dealing. But we'll know what the City will do if there are pot holes in front of the building. Fix first or buy first?


Janet
Old Palo Alto
on May 21, 2013 at 3:35 pm
Janet, Old Palo Alto
on May 21, 2013 at 3:35 pm

The post office is the centerpiece of Palo Alto architecture.
Hopefully the city will finally do something right and purchase the building so future generations can see what Palo Alto used to look like. Miki's Market, the JCC and the other structural abominations along Alma Street, are, unfortunately, the legacy for this city council. Shame on them.


Not an issue
Community Center
on May 21, 2013 at 3:57 pm
Not an issue, Community Center
on May 21, 2013 at 3:57 pm

Before we start bidding, we need to figure out how much this will cost us in the long run and what the city plans to do with it--- despite kniss and Holman cooing over this, they have never been fiscally responsible.
The JCC is a lovely structure-- the real abominations are the eichlers and most of the homes in professorville. The only recent abomination is the cheese cake factory


JerryL
Adobe-Meadow
on May 21, 2013 at 5:00 pm
JerryL, Adobe-Meadow
on May 21, 2013 at 5:00 pm

I have not seen any comment about Earthquake Safety. Is this historic building safe or not? How much will we have to spend to bring it
up to a safe condition? Will it have to be brought up to code? How much will that cost? It seems as if having to maintain historic features could drive up the costs of making the building safe because we will have to do it while not changing the appearance.


Not an issue
Community Center
on May 21, 2013 at 5:08 pm
Not an issue, Community Center
on May 21, 2013 at 5:08 pm

Good point, jerryL. I am sure that this and other potential costs do matter to kniss/ Holman et al. If it is " historic" and council members can get some press coverage from supporting the issue ( a kniss specialty) then cost dosn't matter.
May I also suggest the money that knss/ Holman want to spend on the bike bridge over 101 be used for this--- et them choose.


Rick
Downtown North
on May 22, 2013 at 1:36 am
Rick, Downtown North
on May 22, 2013 at 1:36 am

Let a private party purchase the post office, historic guidelines will still have to be followed. Close the downtown library which is just a homeless camp mainly and reconfigure it for the police department. Close down forest between Ramona and Bryant and create underground parking for the police vehicles. Then move the development center staff to the police floors in city hall. Enough of all these libraries and buying wasteful property. Get it together people!


sandy
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 22, 2013 at 11:15 am
sandy, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 22, 2013 at 11:15 am

Rick, you are so exactly right. I agree, and I've been saying the same thing for years.


sandy
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 22, 2013 at 11:19 am
sandy, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 22, 2013 at 11:19 am

Whoops, except, of course, for selling the post office to a private party, which I DON'T agree with. The city should buy it.


David
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 24, 2013 at 10:52 am
David, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 24, 2013 at 10:52 am

If the city purchases this property, I foresee it turning into a money pit. While it may be a historic building with unique architecture, the city does not have the experience and resources to honor its heritage.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.