News

Parking permit program in Southgate gains support

Palo Alto's planning commission recommends adopting Residential Preferential Program near Palo Alto High School

After watching neighborhoods to the north and to the south adopt new parking-permit programs over the past year, the residents of Southgate are preparing for their turn.

The neighborhood, which is located near Palo Alto High School, has been serving for years as an unofficial parking lot for Paly students. On Wednesday night, the Planning and Transportation Commission gave its stamp of approval to a parking program designed to relieve the congestion along the curbs.

The new Residential Preferential Program is modeled in many ways on the recent programs in downtown and Evergreen Park, which is near the California Avenue business district. Much like in the Evergreen Park program, every resident in the new parking district would be eligible for one free parking permit and the option of buying up to three more for $50 each.

Unlike the other two programs, which were driven in large part by employees parking on residential streets and which allocated a share of permits for workers, the Southgate program is geared primarily toward residents. The district only has two businesses, both medical clinics, within its boundaries and the program allocates 10 permits in total for their potential parking needs. These six-month permits would cost $74.50 each; low-income workers would be charged $25 each.

Parking convenience isn't the only reason why Southgate residents petitioned for the new program. Jim McFall, who serves on the neighborhood's parking committee, said improving safety is a key goal. One of the defining characteristics of the neighborhood, he told the commission, is the narrowness of its streets, many of which are 24 feet or less. With cars parked along both curbs, the streets effectively become one way.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

"That exacerbates congestion and traffic," McFall said. “And we also have the Castilleja Bike Boulevard going through the neighborhood. It raises significant safety concerns.

"The neighborhood wasn't designed in the '20s for anything close to double-loaded or double-parked streets."

The commission voted 6-1, with Susan Monk dissenting, to grant the neighborhood its request. A parking-occupancy survey last year found that 89 percent of the the neighborhood's spaces got filled up around lunchtime, up from 71 percent in the morning and from 54 percent in the evening.

"This clearly shows the impact of Palo Alto High School and PAUSD students, employees and visitors on the neighborhood parking supply," a report from planning staff stated. "With a mid-day occupancy rate of over 85 percent, many blocks do not have any available on-street spaces during the lunch-time hour."

The city and the district had already taken some actions to address the parking crunch. Last year, the district revised its permit system so that students who live near Paly will not get priority for parking passes – a changed designed to encourage them to walk or bike. And the city was able to free up some spaces by restriping several portion of El Camino Real.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Even with these changes, many residents have continued to call for the permit program. Last March, the city mailed out surveys to the 232 properties in the district, which is bounded by Churchill Avenue, the Caltrain tracks, Sequoia Avenue and El Camino Real. Of the 128 that responded, 95 supported moving ahead with the program and 33 opposed it.

Much like in Evergreen Park, the new program was approved for one year, with expectations that the city will revise it based on results and feedback. Most commissioners lauded staff's work on the new program, which residents have been requesting for more than a year.

Given how long it has taken the city to establish the downtown and Evergreen Park programs, Commissioner Asher Waldfogel called the Southgate effort "fast paced" by city standards. Commissioner Doria Summa concurred.

"I'm very happy and pleased for the neighborhood because they really want it," Summa said.

Even Monk, who voted against the motion, said she agreed that the neighborhood can use a program. She noted, however, that the city's occupancy surveys were conducted before Paly changed its permit system and before the new spaces were freed up on El Camino. The commission, she said, does not have the needed data to see what effect these changes had.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

"It's important to have a program,” Monk said. "I don't know if this is the answer to those problems."

If the City Council approves the program, as is widely expected, the new restrictions are scheduled to roll out this fall, with enforcement starting in October.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Parking permit program in Southgate gains support

Palo Alto's planning commission recommends adopting Residential Preferential Program near Palo Alto High School

After watching neighborhoods to the north and to the south adopt new parking-permit programs over the past year, the residents of Southgate are preparing for their turn.

The neighborhood, which is located near Palo Alto High School, has been serving for years as an unofficial parking lot for Paly students. On Wednesday night, the Planning and Transportation Commission gave its stamp of approval to a parking program designed to relieve the congestion along the curbs.

The new Residential Preferential Program is modeled in many ways on the recent programs in downtown and Evergreen Park, which is near the California Avenue business district. Much like in the Evergreen Park program, every resident in the new parking district would be eligible for one free parking permit and the option of buying up to three more for $50 each.

Unlike the other two programs, which were driven in large part by employees parking on residential streets and which allocated a share of permits for workers, the Southgate program is geared primarily toward residents. The district only has two businesses, both medical clinics, within its boundaries and the program allocates 10 permits in total for their potential parking needs. These six-month permits would cost $74.50 each; low-income workers would be charged $25 each.

Parking convenience isn't the only reason why Southgate residents petitioned for the new program. Jim McFall, who serves on the neighborhood's parking committee, said improving safety is a key goal. One of the defining characteristics of the neighborhood, he told the commission, is the narrowness of its streets, many of which are 24 feet or less. With cars parked along both curbs, the streets effectively become one way.

"That exacerbates congestion and traffic," McFall said. “And we also have the Castilleja Bike Boulevard going through the neighborhood. It raises significant safety concerns.

"The neighborhood wasn't designed in the '20s for anything close to double-loaded or double-parked streets."

The commission voted 6-1, with Susan Monk dissenting, to grant the neighborhood its request. A parking-occupancy survey last year found that 89 percent of the the neighborhood's spaces got filled up around lunchtime, up from 71 percent in the morning and from 54 percent in the evening.

"This clearly shows the impact of Palo Alto High School and PAUSD students, employees and visitors on the neighborhood parking supply," a report from planning staff stated. "With a mid-day occupancy rate of over 85 percent, many blocks do not have any available on-street spaces during the lunch-time hour."

The city and the district had already taken some actions to address the parking crunch. Last year, the district revised its permit system so that students who live near Paly will not get priority for parking passes – a changed designed to encourage them to walk or bike. And the city was able to free up some spaces by restriping several portion of El Camino Real.

Even with these changes, many residents have continued to call for the permit program. Last March, the city mailed out surveys to the 232 properties in the district, which is bounded by Churchill Avenue, the Caltrain tracks, Sequoia Avenue and El Camino Real. Of the 128 that responded, 95 supported moving ahead with the program and 33 opposed it.

Much like in Evergreen Park, the new program was approved for one year, with expectations that the city will revise it based on results and feedback. Most commissioners lauded staff's work on the new program, which residents have been requesting for more than a year.

Given how long it has taken the city to establish the downtown and Evergreen Park programs, Commissioner Asher Waldfogel called the Southgate effort "fast paced" by city standards. Commissioner Doria Summa concurred.

"I'm very happy and pleased for the neighborhood because they really want it," Summa said.

Even Monk, who voted against the motion, said she agreed that the neighborhood can use a program. She noted, however, that the city's occupancy surveys were conducted before Paly changed its permit system and before the new spaces were freed up on El Camino. The commission, she said, does not have the needed data to see what effect these changes had.

"It's important to have a program,” Monk said. "I don't know if this is the answer to those problems."

If the City Council approves the program, as is widely expected, the new restrictions are scheduled to roll out this fall, with enforcement starting in October.

Comments

Neva
Old Palo Alto
on Apr 27, 2017 at 1:01 pm
Neva, Old Palo Alto
on Apr 27, 2017 at 1:01 pm

A fall out from Paly students not being able to park in South Gate is that they are now
parking on the 100 block of Churchill, Emerson and surrounding streets over the tracks.

Neva


Sue
College Terrace
on Apr 27, 2017 at 2:53 pm
Sue, College Terrace
on Apr 27, 2017 at 2:53 pm

I live in College Terrace. I am very happy with our RPPP, and I am proud of CT for leading the way. I hope other neighborhoods will be able to have some version our program. In fact, it should probably be city wide, since the parking problem will just be pushed from one neighborhood to another, until it is implemented across town.


Resident
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 27, 2017 at 3:52 pm
Resident, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 27, 2017 at 3:52 pm

So what happens when a neighborhood is impacted by park parkings at weekends, community center parking at evenings and weekends, school parking at evenings and weekends, and church parking on Sunday mornings?

Do those neighborhoods get RRPs too that work for evenings and weekends?


Samuel L.
Registered user
Duveneck/St. Francis
on May 1, 2017 at 12:09 pm
Samuel L., Duveneck/St. Francis
Registered user
on May 1, 2017 at 12:09 pm

@Neva,
Those could be Castilleja students, as well as Paly students, as the Southgate program has not started yet. Plus as the school year goes on, more students are getting their license and are unable to get permits to park on campus.

I would suggest you talk to Paly and PAUSD to make them aware of the impact their ever-increasing capacity limits have put a strain on your neighborhood.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.