Despite a shortfall of more than $50 million in their infrastructure plan, Palo Alto officials on Monday reaffirmed their commitment to contribute $7 million for the reconstruction of the Junior Museum and Zoo.
By a unanimous vote, the City Council formalized its agreement with the nonprofit Friends of the Palo Alto Junior Miseum and Zoo and agreed to spend more than $3.3 million in the coming year to assist with the reconstruction. This includes about $2 million for the reconfiguration of the parking lot in the popular Rinconada Park facility, as well as funding for utility and plumbing work and for relocating the zoo to Cubberley Community Center during construction.
In addition to the $3.3 million that the city has already been budget for the zoo's reconstruction this year, the council also committed Monday to identifying an additional $3.8 million in the coming two years to help pay for museum exhibits, fixtures, equipment and improvements on the west end of the park.
The Friends group is footing most of the construction, having recently raised $25 million in private funds for the effort.
Though council members generally supported the zoo's reconstruction, some raised concerns about committing funds at a time of uncertainty for the city's infrastructure plan, which includes two garages, two fire stations, a new public-safety building and a bike bridge over U.S. Highway 101, among other items. With the costs rising, the plan has an estimated budget shortfall of about $56 million.
Given the budget uncertainty, council members Tom DuBois and Karen Holman proposed considering the future $3.8 million contribution in the context of a broader discussion about the city's infrastructure needs. Holman noted that this is "an incredibly unprecedented time in terms of cost of development," while DuBois said he was concerned about the city's infrastructure plan being "well above budget."
DuBois' proposal to consider the project in the context of other infrastructure projects ultimately fell by a 3-6 vote, with only Holman and Lydia Kou joining him.
Other council members pointed to the Friends' group's fundraising success and argued that, even with the $7 million contribution, the city is getting a bargain. Councilman Cory Wolbach, the council's liaison to the Junior Museum and Zoo, said the project "embodies some of the core Palo Alto values: science, education, culture, nature and imagination."
"It's a lot of money that the city is putting in, but it's definitely worth it," Wolbach said. "And the amount the community is putting in is the larger share."
Councilman Greg Scharff said he was "amazed" by the Friends' group's success in raising money and steering the project through the city's planning pipeline. He argued that any hesitation in committing city funds to the project could delay construction, which is currently scheduled to start in the spring.
The project, he said, is a "great use of city funds."
"It's easy not to make something happen in Palo Alto," Scharff said. "It's really hard for all the pieces to come together, to go through all the boards and commissions, and then come to the council and get it done."
Aletha Coleman, president of the Friends group, said in a statement that the board is "honored to make the new Palo Alto Junior Museum & Zoo a reality for future generations of children and their families."
"The improved JMZ will continue to provide exceptional early-science programs that inspire a love of science and nature, as it has done for more than 80 years," Coleman said.
Comments
Crescent Park
on Feb 6, 2018 at 2:43 pm
on Feb 6, 2018 at 2:43 pm
Why does Palo Alto need a zoo? A museum is fine, but why a zoo? If they want to rehabilitate wild animals, use some of it's open space for a wild animal care facility, don't put them in a zoo. I felt really sorry for the two bobcats that used to be kept in a very small space in the museum. Are they still there? I hope not.
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Feb 6, 2018 at 3:26 pm
Registered user
on Feb 6, 2018 at 3:26 pm
Just a few days ago it was reported that the city needed "only" $4,000,000 to redo the Junior Museum [portion removed] but now it's $$7,000,000.
Did the city finally decide to fix their horrible new design of the nearby Middlefield / Embarcadero intersection where they've decided to back up traffic by eliminating the left turn lane and added a new bus stop only 3 car lengths lane after the intersection and right where the road now narrows to one lane?
Midtown
on Feb 6, 2018 at 3:41 pm
on Feb 6, 2018 at 3:41 pm
Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Feb 6, 2018 at 6:19 pm
Registered user
on Feb 6, 2018 at 6:19 pm
From Friday, February 2. perhaps someone can explain why the cost to the city for the Junior Museum and Zoo has gone up from $4,000,000 to $7,000,000 in just a four days.
Web Link
"Even a major Palo Alto Junior Museum and Zoo renovation — perhaps the city's most popular infrastructure project to break ground this year — is facing budgetary uncertainty. Despite a successful $25 million fundraising drive by the nonprofit Friends of the Junior Museum, the zoo project hinges in part on a $4 million contribution from the city, which is responsible for redesigning the parking lot and creating a new bike path for the Rinconada Park attraction. And while the project has enough funding to get started, more money will be needed further down the line to furnish the zoo with a variety of interactive features, including an insectarium, a butterfly exhibit, a touch tide pool tank and — most notably — a "Tree House" feature, which is intended to offer visitors a two-story zoo experience and allow them to "explore the tree canopy and have up-close encounters with the birds and animals that live there," according to a Community Services Department report. These features were removed from the renovation design in 2016, when the project was scaled back because of rising costs."
Greendell/Walnut Grove
on Feb 7, 2018 at 9:45 am
on Feb 7, 2018 at 9:45 am
I fully support this project. The Jr. Museum & Zoo is dedicated to improving child education for disadvantaged demographics. It's a refuge for rescued animals and a source of family growth; the new building will only enhance the JMZ's capacity to serve the Peninsula's future generations, and it's money well-spent within the context of the next several decades.
Yes, we're all aware that traffic's inconvenient. There are too many people and driving is no fun. However, to consider turn lanes and intersections more important than a science center appears somewhat short-sighted. The only real solution to the traffic issue is to reduce the number of people coming in every day. Denying the JMZ well-deserved funding will not solve your problems.
Walter Hays School
on Feb 7, 2018 at 12:51 pm
on Feb 7, 2018 at 12:51 pm
Hi Folks,
If you read the article correctly not all $7M dollars is going to the JMZ!
It is divided for various projects within the City. Some is for the
Parking Lot which is used by Lucie Stern, Children' Theatre, JMZ, Childrens' Library, Rinconada Park and parents at Walter Hays as well as projects for improving Riconada Park.
Downtown North
on Feb 7, 2018 at 1:13 pm
on Feb 7, 2018 at 1:13 pm
This is a good use of city money. The PAJMZ benefits everyone in the community. It can be used by any resident and is a huge asset to the students and children of the city.
The city needs to stop spending money on bloated salaries, bloated staff (how many assistant city managers do we need), and bloated fire departments (we have how many fire fighters fighting what - 2 or 3 fires a year???? - how about we get rid of some and just hire paramedics to actually work instead of sleeping and eating while being paid).
The city invites in large corporations, is adding thousands of people a year to the population of the city and has done nothing to add parks, recreation facilities and city amenities for residents. They need to focus on the residents. You know, they people who supply the property tax money to pay their salaries. We are over 40 acres behind in park land per resident that the comprehensive plan calls for and we are getting nothing from the city. One tiny improvement to the PAJMZ is a start but they have a long way to go to make it up to residents for overpopulating this area and making our quality of life miserable.
Community Center
on Feb 7, 2018 at 1:19 pm
on Feb 7, 2018 at 1:19 pm
TRAFFIC
Why does everything have to get bigger to be better??