It took persuasion, diplomacy and plenty of patience, but Michael Dorricott's dream of opening a gym in downtown Palo Alto is now on the cusp of becoming reality.
The gym, called Training Space, is set to take over the building at 999 Alma St. that was occupied by Anthropologie before the store moved to Stanford Shopping Center in 2015. Though city planners had signed off on the conditional use permit that the gym required, official approval was deferred because of two separate appeals from neighbors, who worried about the noise and parking impacts of the new facility.
Because of these appeals, the project was required to go through public hearings in front of the Planning and Transportation Commission, which voted on June 27 to support the application, and the City Council, which was slated to review the proposal after it returns from its July break.
Now, it looks like that review won't be necessary after all. Both of the resident groups who challenged the project had withdrawn their appeals, allowing the gym to move ahead, the Weekly has learned. Neilson Buchanan, who represented one of the appellant groups, informed city officials on Saturday that his neighborhood group no longer wishes to pursue its challenge. Dena Mossar, who co-signed the other appeal, had earlier agreed to withdraw it.
The decision by both appellants to drop their respective challenges means that Training Space can open in September, barring unforeseen complications, Dorricott said.
The decision by Buchanan's and Mossar's groups to withdraw their appeals means that Training Space will be the first business that is allowed to open downtown under the council's new rule on ground-retail protections. Last year, the council responded to concerns from the property owner about the difficulty of attracting retail to the corner of Alma and Addison, at downtown's southern periphery, by relaxing the requirement for ground-floor retail. The council specified that a gym (as well as several other "retail-like" uses) can open on downtown's periphery, provided they receive a conditional use permit.
Buchanan told the Weekly that after speaking to other neighbors, they decided not to challenge the city on this project. The group had argued in the appeal that the new gym -- along with two medical offices that are set to occupy the other half of the building on Alma Street -- would exacerbate the neighborhood's parking shortage, an assertion that Dorricott's team pushed back against. Because the building is "grandfathered" and because the parking demand for the gym is expected to be below Anthropologie's, Dorricott is not required to provide any additional parking.
On Monday, Buchanan told the Weekly that members of his group weren't clear on the precise impacts of the new businesses. As such, they agreed not to dispute the city over the application, he said.
"All we have is experience from the past and no real experience with three businesses coming online." Buchanan told the Weekly.
For Dorricott, the withdrawal is a welcome surprise after months of delays, which he said had cost him more than $60,000. He said Mossar had withdrawn her appeal earlier, after he had agreed to inform his customers about the neighborhood's parking situation and to encourage them to park on Alma Street, rather than on the residential streets in the South of Forest Avenue neighborhood.
His project team did not expect the second appeal, from Buchanan's group, to be rescinded. Dorricott said he had met with Buchanan at the Chamber of Commerce but that the conference did not lead to any resolution.
At the same time, Dorricott said he was hopeful throughout the process that his business and the residents will find a way to amicably work things out. He noted that his gym will have a membership cap.
"The way I saw it, if we as a business and the community members can't come to some sort of agreement on our own, how strong is our community, really?" Dorricott said. "That was my perspective going into it. I believe people can come to some sort of a conclusion most of the time, as long as people are willing to be fair and to give in for the greater good. That's what I tried to do."
Comments
University South
on Jul 23, 2018 at 10:34 pm
on Jul 23, 2018 at 10:34 pm
Such good news!!
Mountain View
on Jul 24, 2018 at 8:24 am
on Jul 24, 2018 at 8:24 am
[Post removed.]
Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 24, 2018 at 11:09 am
on Jul 24, 2018 at 11:09 am
Look at most people you see on the streets running or riding their bikes. Look at most of the people you see hiking in the hills. Now look at most people in the gym. Everyone has their preference, but it seems that real activity rather than inside replacements is where fitness really occurs.
Downtown North
on Jul 24, 2018 at 1:55 pm
on Jul 24, 2018 at 1:55 pm
Michael Dorricott's emotional 'dream' of opening a gym didn't move me.
Developers know which strings to pull and as has been said many times, "The Key to Success is Sincerity. Once you can fake that, you've got it made."
University South
on Jul 24, 2018 at 4:29 pm
on Jul 24, 2018 at 4:29 pm
I know a lot of residents who have been looking for a gym near home now that Vivre closed. They heard this one could be a replacement, but they've been waiting to see when this one will open, with delay after delay. This is great news for them!
Downtown North
on Jul 24, 2018 at 6:09 pm
on Jul 24, 2018 at 6:09 pm
I have found that running for office burns a lot of calories
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 25, 2018 at 11:39 am
on Jul 25, 2018 at 11:39 am
The last thing any commercial area of Palo Alto needs is yet another fitness facility. I can't imagine any normal human being wanting to exercise in a main street shop window. Would you please relegate any sort of fitness place to side streets well removed from downtown areas or the back of shopping centers. Such places as exercise stores discourage me from walking in the downtown areas. Why do you need to show off so much?
Crescent Park
on Jul 25, 2018 at 9:08 pm
on Jul 25, 2018 at 9:08 pm
> Why do you need to show off so much?
This is Palo Alto ... you have to ask? ;-)
I don't really get the resistance to a downtown gym, lost of cities and towns have them. The only thing I can think of is parking, the universal problem in Palo Alto that our developers and City Council refused to deal with.
Downtown North
on Jul 26, 2018 at 11:42 am
on Jul 26, 2018 at 11:42 am
Off to a great start... Already have an unpermitted banner posted on the building. Welcome to Palo Alto.
University South
on Jul 26, 2018 at 11:56 am
on Jul 26, 2018 at 11:56 am
"The last thing any commercial area of Palo Alto needs is yet another fitness facility. I can't imagine any normal human being wanting to exercise in a main street shop window. Would you please relegate any sort of fitness place to side streets well removed from downtown areas or the back of shopping centers."
Your comment-observation makes sense to me.
How tacky (except maybe for muscle-bound narcissists & those wishing to model designer work-out fashions for the public to admire through the window).
They should call it 'The Elite Fitness Gym of Palo Alto'.
Exclusive memberships will sell like hotcakes (mostly amongst the PA newbies) as this is no longer the Palo Alto of old.
It's becoming more like Danville...except with a different political leaning.
Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 26, 2018 at 12:30 pm
on Jul 26, 2018 at 12:30 pm
Alright- you should file an appeal to prevent them from opening or a complaint about the banner. After all, everything must be done to throw up roadblocks against the kind of business owners that Pali also claims to want.
Evergreen Park
on Jul 26, 2018 at 1:05 pm
on Jul 26, 2018 at 1:05 pm
Forget the banner...just hire sign spinners in full work-out garb and place them all along University Avenue.
At night, set up a search light to attract even more prospective customers.
Downtown North
on Jul 26, 2018 at 6:18 pm
on Jul 26, 2018 at 6:18 pm
[Portion removed.] Seriously, "Alright" is really upset about a banner hanging on a building that is vacant and about to begin construction? I'm sure we can all cut this guy some slack after the neighbors filed two appeals that cost him $60k, months of lost time, and then ultimately retracted them. Didn't cost the neighbors a dime (that's just so wrong by the way...) but this poor guy, who probably just wants to better himself, make a life for his family and grab a little piece of the American Dream, is getting so much grief on this blog. Some of us absolutely need places like this to exercise. Maybe you don't ("Sunshine" and "Leaving Palo Alto") but that does not make it wrong. Show a little tolerance why don't you. I made a conscious decision to live in an amazing, diverse, vibrant and evolving place and love it here. This type of small business is just what I want to see more of [portion removed.]