Faced with a rising senior population and surging demand for emergency medical response, Palo Alto Fire Department officials are exploring a new service model that would emphasize education, screening and other preventive measures.
The emphasis on "prevention" is a key recommendation of a new assessment that the city has just commissioned — a report that considers the both the current and the future needs of Palo Alto and Stanford University. The report concluded that because of the city's aging population, calls for emergency medical services from the city are expected to increase by between 25 percent and 34 percent come 2030. Calls for other types of services are expected to go up between 10 percent and 16 percent over the same period.
Jennifer van Stelle, the city's consultant, alluded to the "silver tsunami" in Palo Alto and elsewhere, noting that the city's population of older residents is to go up, even as the population of the youngest group is declining. Palo Alto currently has a higher proportion of adults 65 and older (17 percent) than Santa Clara County overall (12 percent), according to the report. Because older residents tend to account for more medical calls, calls for emergency medical service are expected to go up.
"Medical emergencies are really expected to increase between now and 2030," van Stelle, a consultant with the firm Actionable Insights, told the committee Tuesday.
The traditional method to address expected increases would be to add more 24-hour ambulances, the report states. This, however, is a costly method of addressing the problem. As such, it recommends considering various forms of "community paramedicine" and "mobile integrated health care" practice approaches, which are coming into vogue elsewhere.
The report describes the "community paramedicine" and "mobile integrated health care" approach as one in which "a community has a greater access to 24/7 non-emergency health care, including health education, outreach, monitoring and prevention, brought to the patient by inter-professional teams who are integrated into and/or partnered with local or regional health care systems and under appropriate medical direction."
The approach generally entails more partnership between the city and health care providers and an emphasis on patient outcomes rather than traditional metrics like response times, according to the report.
The report points to examples including one in Fort Worth, Texas, where frequent 911 users are enrolled in a program that includes home visits and phone support (call volumes from program "graduates" were shown to drop by 61 percent in the 12 months after the program). A similar program in Colorado Springs, Colorado, led to a 50 percent reduction in call volume from two-thirds of patients in the program's first two years.
"It's essentially taking the emergency-response vehicle or field personnel and getting out into those homes and trying to prevent emergencies from occurring," Fire Chief Eric Nickel told the Policy and Services Committee during its review of the new report Tuesday.
Nickel emphasized that mobile-integrated health care is a field that only came into existence about five years ago. As such, the city will have to consider any new liabilities that it would come with. He analogized the switch to a new model to the city's experiences in 1974, when leaders were debating whether to get into the paramedic field.
"Imagine a paramedic who is also a social worker," Nickel said. "There are some liability factors we'd have to consider. ... What are the legal issues out there? There are some things that could expand the scope of the paramedic and the scope of risk."
Nickel called the new report, and the upcoming evaluation of alternative models, as an opportunity for the department to "peer over the horizon."
"I am concerned about the silver tsunami," Nickel said. "As our citizens age in place, we do know from our data that they use our services and we want to be prepared for that.
"We are all about trying to reduce community crises and preventing emergencies from occurring."
The council committee voted unanimously to accept the report and lauded the department's forward-thinking approach, which Councilman Cory Wolbach said puts the city "ahead of the curve." Councilman Tom DuBois suggested that another way to aid the department's effort to prevent emergencies is the creation of a "dedicated senior shuttle" that would go to health care facilities.
"It may be a community shuttle but in the middle of the day, it can be used for other things," DuBois said.
Comments
Downtown North
on Nov 14, 2018 at 1:40 pm
on Nov 14, 2018 at 1:40 pm
In addition to an emphasis on "prevention", our Fire Department should review its use of fire engines, vs ambulances, for medical calls. From my understanding, 97% of fire station calls are of medical nature, vs an actual fire. Regardless of this, we perpetually send out our huge fire trucks. This wasteful, loud, and terribly inefficient.
I addressed this with city hall a few years ago, and understood it to be a 3-person per call union issue, but I thought that issue has been resolved.
Please address it.
Registered user
Midtown
on Nov 15, 2018 at 9:29 am
Registered user
on Nov 15, 2018 at 9:29 am
Well that really depends on what is going on.
First off the fire truck may get there faster than the ambulance especially during periods of high utilization.
The fire crew is trained with EMT’s and Paramedics as well and can evaluate and initiate life saving measures upon arrival
They can also assist in extricating patients who have say fallen in the tub etc
Given the ratio of structure fires versus medical calls it also allowed practice and proficiency with their gear etc
In that light I do not mind the fire department rolling on medical calls
Registered user
College Terrace
on Nov 15, 2018 at 10:27 am
Registered user
on Nov 15, 2018 at 10:27 am
I like that Councilmember Dubois is thinking creatively about re-purposing the shuttle during the shuttle service's idle hours.
That said, the shuttle would have to be reliable. I can vouch for the fact that it currently is not. Yesterday it ran late and today I waited 50 minutes for a shuttle; several that are listed on the schedule simply did not materialize.
Traffic is another issue. Someone in this forum recently mentioned the MPFD chief's concern about the impact of traffic on response time. I hope to never need an ambulance or other emergency service in a hurry b/c road congestion is such that sometimes no vehicles can progress. It's one thing to be inconvenienced, quite another to suffer ill consequences. Maybe this will be the issue that forces us to make some progress on our transit and circulation issues. Hope so.
Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Nov 15, 2018 at 11:25 am
on Nov 15, 2018 at 11:25 am
In addition to traditional ambulances, the London Ambulance Service also has single responders who may be either EMTs or paramedics and they may respond in either a car, a motorcycle or on a bicycle:
Web Link
Web Link
Web Link
I wonder if the Menlo Park Fire Department would consider a trial period with an EMT or paramedic on a motorcycle. Sometimes traffic on Willow Road is at a standstill and an EMT or paramedic on a motorcycle would be able to respond more quickly than a fire truck or ambulance to an accident on the 101.
Crescent Park
on Nov 15, 2018 at 11:35 am
on Nov 15, 2018 at 11:35 am
I applaud Palo Alto Fire Department and the consultant Actionable Insights for addressing the importance of demographic data in their planning. In the October series in the LA times: The Next California Link: TheNextCalifornia
the only age group that will grow as a percent of our overall population is Over 65, growing from 14% to 26% statewide.
Palo Alto's numbers will likely be higher.
We need to take this demographic change into account for all our planning, not just emergency services. The needs of the over 65 population for transportation, health services, home services, etc. will impact many city departments. Each city department should be working with representatives from this group and aging experts to build appropriate solutions into their plans today.
College Terrace
on Nov 15, 2018 at 2:04 pm
on Nov 15, 2018 at 2:04 pm
Quit sending fire truck every time emergency # is dialed. Adds expenses and in majority cases unneeded.
Charleston Gardens
on Nov 16, 2018 at 5:31 pm
on Nov 16, 2018 at 5:31 pm
A fire engine responds to every type of call because it can handle every type of call. When someone calls 911 for a medical emergency someone needs to get there ASAP. They won’t need an ambulance for 5-10 minutes after that as assessment and treatment occur on scene. This is why most cities use fire engines to provide first responder coverage for all emergencies. There is no reason to send an ambulance first thing for many emergencies as long as a paramedic arrives quickly. Another reason is many medical emergencies do take 5+ people to handle and it’s difficult to know on most calls how many are needed until someone arrives.
Palo Alto Fire Department is already a low cost department compared to surrounding departments. They have already cut the budget (prior to cutting elsewhere) and the citizens are already experiencing delays during critical emergencies.
Consider the above when someone suggests sending emergency personnel to a house to perform community paramedicine. If the purpose is prevention in order to free up responders it does not make sense to spend 1 hour trying to prevent 20-40 minutes of work. It does make sense to protect the public and make sure they are safe which is why that type of program should exist but be staffed by cheaper non 911 personnel.
Community Center
on Nov 16, 2018 at 7:19 pm
on Nov 16, 2018 at 7:19 pm
How do fire engines manage to stay in such pristine condition? I've never seen any with scratches or dings and one would think these apparatus would be easily subject to them during the course of periodic usage.
I've also never seen one in an autobody shop...just firemen washing them from time to time. Amazing.
Barron Park
on Nov 24, 2018 at 5:05 pm
on Nov 24, 2018 at 5:05 pm
This article and the report are seriously lacking very important details. Just because the fire department and the city thinks something is a good idea doesn’t mean they can just go and do it. The provision EMS and the use of EMS personnel who are certified and liscenes EMS providers falls under title 22 of the CA code of regulations. As such, the city would need to submit and receive an approval from both the county and the state to provide such services. Further, under current regulations only counties in CA who have a project waiver can conduct such programs and Santa Clara County is not one of them.
Even if this was the case and they could create such a program there are even bigger problems. The biggest being, how do you pay for it? Currently cMS does not reimburse for services of this nature. This would require partnership with private payors like PAMF, Stanford, Kaiser, etc. even private insurance providers.
It’s unfortunate that your only telling part of the story in this article. This is much more complicated and if the report just says they should make a program then, frankly, the city got ripped off big time!!!!
Check out this link for emerging guidance on developing a program like this, it’s free, no expensive consultant with an incomplete answer needed! Www.nfpa.org/451