When Palo Alto opened its first Magical Bridge playground in Mitchell Park four years ago, it was widely acclaimed for featuring slides, swings and other play equipment that accommodate children with disabilities.
Today, the playground isn't just a popular attraction; it's also a blueprint for how other playgrounds are designed, both within and beyond the city's borders. Santa Clara County recently approved $10 million in grants for up to five "inclusive" playgrounds throughout the county, including at El Carmelo Elementary School in Palo Alto. And city staff are looking at Magical Bridge for inspiration as they're moving ahead with renovations to existing parks.
In recent months, Palo Alto's architects and engineers have been finalizing their designs for redeveloping the area of Rinconada Park near the Junior Museum and Zoo, which itself is now in the midst of a $20-million expansion. If things go as planned, both the new zoo and the renovated playground will reopen around spring 2020, said Peter Jensen, landscape architect at the Public Works Department.
The Rinconada plan, which the city's Parks and Recreation Commission enthusiastically and unanimously endorsed on May 28, calls for replacing two existing playgrounds — one for toddlers and one for older children — with the inclusive playground. While it won't be as grand as the Magical Bridge, which was built through intense public fundraising, it would follow a similar philosophy and cater to children with disabilities, with rubber surfacing and all-new playground equipment.
The proposed play area is the centerpiece of a broader, multi-phased plan for the popular 19-acre park, which the City Council adopted in 2017 to govern the space's transformation over the next 25 years. The first phase of the playground redevelopment calls for renovating existing picnic areas, expanding the main turf area, adding new pathways, installing adult fitness equipment and building a "pollinator garden" in the rear area of the new zoo.
The plan also calls for installing a bathroom near the playground, though that component may be deferred to a later phase because of budget constraints, Jensen said.
Because of community input on the renovation plan in February, Jensen said several changes have been incorporated: the picnic area will now be expanded, with the goals of providing more space for family activities; the adult fitness equipment will now be located outside the play area; and a decomposed-granite pathway has been scrapped due to expense.
Much like Magical Bridge, Rinconada's inclusive playground will include a "swing zone" and a "spin zone," as well as an assortment of ramps, monkey bars and other playground essentials. Bucket swings, which offer protection to children with disabilities, and new slides will be added, Jensen said.
The proposed renovation earned rave reviews from the Parks and Recreation Commission, even as members acknowledged that the Rinconada sequel will not rival the Mitchell Park original.
Vice Chair Jeff Greenfield noted that even with the proposed improvements, there will only be one Magical Bridge playground in the Palo Alto parks system. That, however, doesn't mean that the city can't do more to make future playgrounds more inclusive.
"There's lots of requests throughout the community to build another Magical Bridge playground," Greenfield said. "I think we want to emphasize that what we're focusing on is inclusive playgrounds."
The biggest concern, as always, is budget. Like every other infrastructure project that the city has pursued this year, costs have gone up because of the hot construction market. Jensen said that if the Rinconada Park project had been implemented four years ago, the bids would likely be more than 25% lower.
That said, city officials are eager to break ground on the project and to complete it by next spring. Councilwoman Alison Cormack, who serves as council liaison to the Parks and Recreation Commission, said she was excited about opening another inclusive playground.
"The school district is keeping track and they are now implementing their second Magical Bridge playground," Cormack said, alluding to the El Carmelo playground and the one that was approved last year for Addison Elementary School. "I hope this counts as ours, so we'll still be tied."
Comments
Palo Verde
on Jul 19, 2019 at 8:39 am
on Jul 19, 2019 at 8:39 am
I like the idea of having special playgrounds like this
Please can we now have a playground for older children where younger children are discouraged. Older children need to be able to use their big motor skills, their extra energy, their stronger muscles, their excitement and vitality, without worrying about little children getting in their zone. We should have toddler tots areas, and we should also have adventure areas for those who want to be a little more boisterous. Children should be able to adjust their play behavior to accommodate everyone at times, but there are other times when the big kids need to be allowed to be big kids.
Downtown North
on Jul 19, 2019 at 1:46 pm
on Jul 19, 2019 at 1:46 pm
I am suprised that with all the funds that were raised for the renovaton project, so little was left to support and fund the playground. I really hope that it will be welcoming for both children and adults of differing abilities and not cluttered with ramps.
I'd also argue that it would be better to build more playgrounds in the spirit of Magical Bridge than continuing to update playgrounds that continue to stay empty. Palo Alto residents deserve better. Magical Bridge is simply too busy for my disabled adult son and we have so few choices in Palo Alto.
Downtown North
on Jul 22, 2019 at 7:37 pm
on Jul 22, 2019 at 7:37 pm
Can we stop pretending the we are "showing the way forward" with multi-million dollar playgrounds?
I dearly hope I'm wrong. Maybe we are indeed paying these astronomical sums to develop blueprints (literal ones, not the figurative ones mentioned in the article) and supply lists and assembly instructions that we are making public so that any old town could take them and replicate great parks at a fraction of our cost... at costs, you know, somewhat close to what real towns outside of this bubble actually have to build parks.
I dearly hope so... please tell me that's so... I would be so surprised, but genuinely excited and proud if that were the case.
Barron Park
on Jul 24, 2019 at 2:36 pm
on Jul 24, 2019 at 2:36 pm
Playgrounds are not empty. They are being used constantly.
Spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on revamping our playgrounds is out of control.