News

Facing recruiting challenges, Palo Alto cuts seats on two commissions

City Council reduces the number of seats on Human Relations Commission and Public Art Commission from seven to five

The Palo Alto City Council voted on June 22 to reduce the number of seats on the Human Relations Commission and the Public Art Commission from seven to five. Embarcadero Media file photo by Veronica Weber.

Citing difficulties in recruiting new volunteers, Palo Alto has reduced the number of seats on two citizen commissions, including one that is focused on promoting diversity and exploring police reform.

The council voted on June 22 to reduce the number of seats on the Public Art and Human Relations commissions from seven to five. The vote followed more than two months of recruitment for vacant seats on the two panels, which netted only a handful of applicants.

In April, when the city was recruiting for vacancies on the two commissions, it received just one application for three open seats on the Human Relations Commission and four applications for four expiring positions on the Public Art Commission. The city had agreed at that time to extend the recruiting period (which remains open for the Human Relations Commission) and to consider reducing the number of seats.

The council began to consider the seat reductions on April 20, when it first directed staff to return with more information about the possible change. On May 11, the council voted unanimously to move ahead with the reductions and asked staff to craft an ordinance that would change the municipal code to reflect the change. The council then voted 6-1 on June 22, with Lydia Kou dissenting, to approve the ordinance, making the change official.

While the council approved the revision with little discussion, its decision to shrink the commissions drew criticism from some residents and commissioners, who argued that the recent public outcry over racial injustice makes this a particularly inopportune time to cut seats on the two panels. Both have been engaged in the city's recent effort to support the Black Lives Matter movement, with the Public Art Commission taking the lead on commissioning artists to paint a mural in front of City Hall and the Human Relations Commission embarking last week on an effort to review Palo Alto Police Department policies for compliance with the 8 Can't Wait platform.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Steven Lee, a member of the Human Relations Commission, wrote an opinion piece in this publication earlier this month in which he argued that the council's move to cut two commission seats, including his own, constitutes a retaliation by council members against him for his positions on police reform, gender equality and funding for the Downtown Streets Team, a nonprofit that was the subject of sexual harassment accusations made by former employees. In all these areas, Lee argued, the council had refused to act despite recommendations from himself and other commissioners.

Lee wrote that his interactions with the council over the three years of his term "reflect a City Hall culture that is unaccountable, resistant to change and dissenting views, overly deferential to a staff that is unresponsive and out of touch with the community's needs."

Several other residents suggested that the move comes at precisely the wrong time — a time when the city should be encouraging more citizen participation. Midtown resident Elizabeth Scott noted that the recent community protests over racial injustice and police brutality "should be an incredibly clear reminder that our failure to dismantle white supremacy and racism are directly responsible (for) the deaths of Black people in the U.S."

"Do not cut back the number of HRC members," Scott wrote. "We need diverse voices on the commission to build a better city that is safe, healthy and joyful to all."

Kou had expressed a similar sentiment. During the council's May 11 discussion, she said she was "torn" over the proposal to cut seats. She said having more members would make it easier for the Human Relations Commission to reflect the diversity of the Palo Alto community.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

"I think it would be great to have seven, so that there would be more diversity among commissions and they can reach out to different areas," Kou said at the May 11 meeting.

Ian Klaus, who serves on the Public Art Commission, also questioned the need to reduce the number of seats. While the move might make the commission "slightly more efficient," having fewer perspectives would probably lead to certain issues not getting advanced.

"As such, I write to encourage the council to reconsider the reduction as it likely means not just fewer people, but fewer perspectives," Klaus wrote in a letter.

The city is still recruiting for the vacancy that was created when Commissioner Quifeng Xue, whose term expires on May 31, 2021, stepped down. Lee, whose term officially expired on May 31 of this year, remains on the commission until the city recruits a new member to fill Xue's seat.

The move to cut seats is also part of the council's broader effort to review and clarify the city's rules for commissions, which currently vary widely in how they function. The review of commission rules is being spearheaded by a council ad hoc committee composed of Vice Mayor Tom DuBois and Councilwoman Alison Cormack.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Facing recruiting challenges, Palo Alto cuts seats on two commissions

City Council reduces the number of seats on Human Relations Commission and Public Art Commission from seven to five

Citing difficulties in recruiting new volunteers, Palo Alto has reduced the number of seats on two citizen commissions, including one that is focused on promoting diversity and exploring police reform.

The council voted on June 22 to reduce the number of seats on the Public Art and Human Relations commissions from seven to five. The vote followed more than two months of recruitment for vacant seats on the two panels, which netted only a handful of applicants.

In April, when the city was recruiting for vacancies on the two commissions, it received just one application for three open seats on the Human Relations Commission and four applications for four expiring positions on the Public Art Commission. The city had agreed at that time to extend the recruiting period (which remains open for the Human Relations Commission) and to consider reducing the number of seats.

The council began to consider the seat reductions on April 20, when it first directed staff to return with more information about the possible change. On May 11, the council voted unanimously to move ahead with the reductions and asked staff to craft an ordinance that would change the municipal code to reflect the change. The council then voted 6-1 on June 22, with Lydia Kou dissenting, to approve the ordinance, making the change official.

While the council approved the revision with little discussion, its decision to shrink the commissions drew criticism from some residents and commissioners, who argued that the recent public outcry over racial injustice makes this a particularly inopportune time to cut seats on the two panels. Both have been engaged in the city's recent effort to support the Black Lives Matter movement, with the Public Art Commission taking the lead on commissioning artists to paint a mural in front of City Hall and the Human Relations Commission embarking last week on an effort to review Palo Alto Police Department policies for compliance with the 8 Can't Wait platform.

Steven Lee, a member of the Human Relations Commission, wrote an opinion piece in this publication earlier this month in which he argued that the council's move to cut two commission seats, including his own, constitutes a retaliation by council members against him for his positions on police reform, gender equality and funding for the Downtown Streets Team, a nonprofit that was the subject of sexual harassment accusations made by former employees. In all these areas, Lee argued, the council had refused to act despite recommendations from himself and other commissioners.

Lee wrote that his interactions with the council over the three years of his term "reflect a City Hall culture that is unaccountable, resistant to change and dissenting views, overly deferential to a staff that is unresponsive and out of touch with the community's needs."

Several other residents suggested that the move comes at precisely the wrong time — a time when the city should be encouraging more citizen participation. Midtown resident Elizabeth Scott noted that the recent community protests over racial injustice and police brutality "should be an incredibly clear reminder that our failure to dismantle white supremacy and racism are directly responsible (for) the deaths of Black people in the U.S."

"Do not cut back the number of HRC members," Scott wrote. "We need diverse voices on the commission to build a better city that is safe, healthy and joyful to all."

Kou had expressed a similar sentiment. During the council's May 11 discussion, she said she was "torn" over the proposal to cut seats. She said having more members would make it easier for the Human Relations Commission to reflect the diversity of the Palo Alto community.

"I think it would be great to have seven, so that there would be more diversity among commissions and they can reach out to different areas," Kou said at the May 11 meeting.

Ian Klaus, who serves on the Public Art Commission, also questioned the need to reduce the number of seats. While the move might make the commission "slightly more efficient," having fewer perspectives would probably lead to certain issues not getting advanced.

"As such, I write to encourage the council to reconsider the reduction as it likely means not just fewer people, but fewer perspectives," Klaus wrote in a letter.

The city is still recruiting for the vacancy that was created when Commissioner Quifeng Xue, whose term expires on May 31, 2021, stepped down. Lee, whose term officially expired on May 31 of this year, remains on the commission until the city recruits a new member to fill Xue's seat.

The move to cut seats is also part of the council's broader effort to review and clarify the city's rules for commissions, which currently vary widely in how they function. The review of commission rules is being spearheaded by a council ad hoc committee composed of Vice Mayor Tom DuBois and Councilwoman Alison Cormack.

Comments

Judith Wasserman
Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jul 15, 2020 at 10:48 am
Judith Wasserman, Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jul 15, 2020 at 10:48 am

As a former member of 2 different commissions, I can tell the Council that one reason you are not getting applications is that you have made sitting on a commission a thankless job. You don't follow the commissions' recommendations and you don't offer any gratitude for service, not even a thank-you letter.

And to the complainers, if you think the commission is important, volunteer to serve on it.


Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 15, 2020 at 11:44 am
Resident 1-Adobe Meadows, Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 15, 2020 at 11:44 am

I have a lot of concerns about "Commissions". If we were in LA I could see it. But we are not LA, we are not SF. We are a relatively small urban city on a narrow, totally built out strip of the peninsula. We are not going to build Hong Kong on this narrow strip of land.
My Concerns;
1. Are the commissioners employees of any of our consultant contracts? That is a conflict of interest.
2. What is the relation of the commission vs. the Police Force? The Police Force is under the gun right now. BLM is a political concept. To what degree are we allowing a political concept interfering with the actual workings of a police department?
We need the head of the police department who is a paid employee of the city to stand up for anything that is questionable and be open to discussion so that the residents get to know what to expect. Some east coast idea of defunding the police is now biting them in the butt. Raging people with signs and chanting is a political game. We need a policy statement that is not subject to games.
3. We need a media that is not paid for by the game people and an put out all of the related facts - not cherry pick only the facts that sell a concept.
4. How do commissions interact with the employees of the city and the city manager? I have yet to figure out why a person on a commission starts assuming directional advise to an employee - who presumably has a manager that working to a total city plan.
This whole year we have seen commissioners who are raging around because their personal goals were not pursued. Those goals appear to be not in conformance with city policy. Some major disconnect between what the point is. Do we have a management issue at the top level of the city? Time to force some hands here if that is the case.


Yes, please cut them and change their focus
Downtown North
on Jul 15, 2020 at 12:11 pm
Yes, please cut them and change their focus, Downtown North
on Jul 15, 2020 at 12:11 pm

I don't feel that the people on the Human Relations or the Art commission represent me or most of the people who live in Palo Alto. Rather than the human relations commission spending all their time and resources pandering to the homeless, what about those of us that don't want them steeling from us and sleeping and pooping in the streets. And the Art commission wastes good money on ugly "art" and then we can't ever get rid of it. (Remember that ugly "digital" egg thing?) They should not be able to buy anything but only negotiate rotating pieces of art that have to leave after a certain amount of time.


rita vrhel
Crescent Park
on Jul 15, 2020 at 12:32 pm
rita vrhel, Crescent Park
on Jul 15, 2020 at 12:32 pm

Thank you Ms. Kou for voting against reducing the number of Commissioners. Since the Commissioners are City Council selected, reduced numbers make it easier to "stack the deck".

Did no one apply or just no one acceptable to the City Council majority? There is a difference. I believe you need to be an "artist" or have an art background to be on the Art Commission. Given the negative response to much of PA's public art (see above comment) perhaps having an "ordinary" resident on the Commission might help broaden the discussion and recruitment.

Regarding the Human Relations Commission, did anyone reach out to residents of diverse backgrounds, discuss the Commission and seek application? Was there an outreach, say to the residents of Buena Vista?

And yes, Ms. Wasserman's comments are timely. Thank you


former commissioner
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 15, 2020 at 2:18 pm
former commissioner, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 15, 2020 at 2:18 pm

As a former commissioner I completely agree with Judith Wasserman's comments. Council's treatment of the decisions by commissions wastes both the Council's time and the commissioners time. In addition, it should be noted that commissioners use a great deal of City staff time. We definitely need to cut down on the number of staff as the pension liability is getting totally out of control.


Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 15, 2020 at 3:27 pm
Resident 1-Adobe Meadows, Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 15, 2020 at 3:27 pm

WOW - there is an interesting point. If the Commissioners are using city staff is that then taking away from the jobs they are suppose to be doing? If we assume that every city employee has a job directed by their management then is serving the requests of a commissioner part of that job - or extracurricular work. What is required here is a clear path of direction concerning the use of city staff - employees of the city - who now become employees of the commissioners? The more we flesh out this issue the more problematical it gets.

If they had all kept their opinions of the city off the global news we would not be aware of these abuses of power.


TimR
Downtown North
on Jul 15, 2020 at 4:01 pm
TimR, Downtown North
on Jul 15, 2020 at 4:01 pm

Is there a political litmus test for these positions, or are people withe truly diverse views allowed? Because I know many Palo Alto residents want to clean up the streets, get rid of the homeless, give police greater authority to prevent and punish crime, etc. But my guess is, the City Council doesn't want diverse voices like that. But maybe I'm wrong.


A.L
Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jul 16, 2020 at 4:34 pm
A.L, Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Jul 16, 2020 at 4:34 pm

Who are these people on the commission? Are they elected? Lived in Palo Alto for 20 years, only heard about them recently, and don't feel they represent anything in my mind for living in Palo Alto. Can we save tax payers money and not have them at all?


Mark Weiss
Downtown North
on Jul 16, 2020 at 5:47 pm
Mark Weiss, Downtown North
on Jul 16, 2020 at 5:47 pm

Kind of reminds me of the joke from "Annie Hall" about the food is bad and such small portions.


Another Former Commissioner
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 16, 2020 at 7:52 pm
Another Former Commissioner, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 16, 2020 at 7:52 pm

The Council chooses to ignore a Commission recommendation when it is poorly thought out. The PTC has been slowly converted to a pro-growth body with all contrary positions eliminated. Only Commissioner Summa and Lauing remain, and their positions are up at the end of the year.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.