News

Town hall highlights clashing views in Castilleja's redevelopment plan

Leaders offer their hopes and concerns about school's future

Clockwise from top left, Palo Alto Weekly reporter Gennady Sheyner, Castilleja Head of School Nanci Kauffman, Palo Alto Weekly editor Jocelyn Dong and Andie Reed, a member of Preserve Neighborhood Quality of Life Now, discuss Castilleja School's proposed redevelopment at a virtual town hall on March 11.

With the City Council days away from its initial action on Castilleja School's proposal to rebuild its campus and gradually expand enrollment, Nanci Kauffman, head of Castilleja, and Andie Reed, member of the neighborhood group Preserve Neighborhood Quality of Life Now, outlined their hopes and concerns about the project at a virtual town hall meeting on Thursday night.

The virtual event, which was sponsored by Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly, focused on some of the contentious issues in the approval process, including traffic impacts, the school's proposed parking garage and its plans to gradually increase enrollment to 540.

While Reed and many other critics of the school's proposal have argued that Castilleja's proposed enrollment number is too high (the school currently has 426 students), Kauffman called it "an ideal number for us because it allows us to increase the high school really with minimal increase in staffing."

"We get to improve our programs, our athletic programs, the arts programs, the language programs improve because we have a few more students to work with and we don't really have to add many staff members," Kauffman said.

Reed said she and her neighbors prefer a more gradual approach, with the school rebuilding its campus and raising its enrollment to about 450 students. While the city's proposed conditions would require the school to minimize its traffic impacts before it can get any further enrollment increases, Reed noted that verifying traffic counts and scaling back enrollment is a complex process that does not go far enough to reassure neighbors who have experienced traffic problems because of the school.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

The Planning and Transportation Commission, which supported the school's plan to go up to 540 students, tried to offer some reassurance to neighbors by creating a "no net new trips" requirement for Castilleja, going well beyond the recommendations of the Environmental Impact Report, which identified a list of mitigations that would bring impacts to "less than significant" levels.

Neither Castilleja nor the neighbors have embraced that idea. Castilleja's transportation consultant argued in a letter that the requirement exceeds what was needed. Castilleja officials did not backtrack from that position Thursday, though they highlighted their success to date in curbing traffic. Almost all students who arrive from afar do so by train, Kauffman said, and school staff are prohibited from getting to school through solo car commuting more than twice per week.

But Reed countered Thursday that the process of verifying trip counts and going through the process of freezing or reducing Castilleja's enrollment is too long and complex to offer real reassurance to the neighborhood next to the school. The school, she said, should go beyond "no net new trips" and work to actually reduce its traffic levels.

Reed suggested that to increase enrollment, the school should embrace a "kiss-and-ride" program where out-of-town students get shuttled in from off-site lots, minimizing the number of cars arriving to and departing from the campus. She also said it's not fair for the city to put all the risks of the school's expansion on the immediate neighborhood.

"What we need to do is not use a baseline of where we were when we were having lot of traffic issues but say, 'Work your way down, and once you have — we'll be talking enrollment.'" Reed said.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

To advance the project, the council would have to certify the environmental analysis for Castilleja's modernization project; approve its request for a variance that allows the new buildings to exceed density regulations in the single-family neighborhood; and approve a new conditional use permit that governs, among other aspects, the school's enrollment numbers and the number of special events the school is allowed to have. While Castilleja had proposed 90 events per year, the planning commission recommended reducing it to 74, as well as having no events on Sundays and limiting the number of events on Saturday evenings to five per year.

They would also have to approve staff's finding that Castilleja's proposed underground garage is compliant with zoning, despite a general prohibition on underground garages in single-family neighborhoods (the prohibition, per code, is limited to residential uses).

Kauffman said that the school had proposed the garage after requests from neighbors early in the process. In 2013, neighbors were "adamant" that they wanted a garage, she said, and the school's modernization plan appeared to be a "non-starter" without a new facility.

Reed noted that while the garage was part of the earlier discussions, shuttles and off-site parking lots were a more popular alternative for the neighbors.

"The idea of digging this hole and filling it with polluting cement and building a bunker for storage of cars is not something that jives with Palo Alto's sustainability goals," Reed said.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

The issue of trust came up repeatedly during the town hall discussion. Reed said it's been a "battle all the way" for the city to get Castilleja to comply with its existing conditional use permit, which limits enrollment to 415 students. After Castilleja exceeded that number, the city issued a $265,000 fine to the school and required it to gradually reduce its enrollment every year.

Kauffman said that the school has worked extremely hard to regain the trust of the community, which is why some of the neighbors who did not support the school's proposal before do so now.

"We think we've fought hard to earn the right to continue on the path that we're on," Kauffman said.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important city government news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

Town hall highlights clashing views in Castilleja's redevelopment plan

Leaders offer their hopes and concerns about school's future

With the City Council days away from its initial action on Castilleja School's proposal to rebuild its campus and gradually expand enrollment, Nanci Kauffman, head of Castilleja, and Andie Reed, member of the neighborhood group Preserve Neighborhood Quality of Life Now, outlined their hopes and concerns about the project at a virtual town hall meeting on Thursday night.

The virtual event, which was sponsored by Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly, focused on some of the contentious issues in the approval process, including traffic impacts, the school's proposed parking garage and its plans to gradually increase enrollment to 540.

While Reed and many other critics of the school's proposal have argued that Castilleja's proposed enrollment number is too high (the school currently has 426 students), Kauffman called it "an ideal number for us because it allows us to increase the high school really with minimal increase in staffing."

"We get to improve our programs, our athletic programs, the arts programs, the language programs improve because we have a few more students to work with and we don't really have to add many staff members," Kauffman said.

Reed said she and her neighbors prefer a more gradual approach, with the school rebuilding its campus and raising its enrollment to about 450 students. While the city's proposed conditions would require the school to minimize its traffic impacts before it can get any further enrollment increases, Reed noted that verifying traffic counts and scaling back enrollment is a complex process that does not go far enough to reassure neighbors who have experienced traffic problems because of the school.

The Planning and Transportation Commission, which supported the school's plan to go up to 540 students, tried to offer some reassurance to neighbors by creating a "no net new trips" requirement for Castilleja, going well beyond the recommendations of the Environmental Impact Report, which identified a list of mitigations that would bring impacts to "less than significant" levels.

Neither Castilleja nor the neighbors have embraced that idea. Castilleja's transportation consultant argued in a letter that the requirement exceeds what was needed. Castilleja officials did not backtrack from that position Thursday, though they highlighted their success to date in curbing traffic. Almost all students who arrive from afar do so by train, Kauffman said, and school staff are prohibited from getting to school through solo car commuting more than twice per week.

But Reed countered Thursday that the process of verifying trip counts and going through the process of freezing or reducing Castilleja's enrollment is too long and complex to offer real reassurance to the neighborhood next to the school. The school, she said, should go beyond "no net new trips" and work to actually reduce its traffic levels.

Reed suggested that to increase enrollment, the school should embrace a "kiss-and-ride" program where out-of-town students get shuttled in from off-site lots, minimizing the number of cars arriving to and departing from the campus. She also said it's not fair for the city to put all the risks of the school's expansion on the immediate neighborhood.

"What we need to do is not use a baseline of where we were when we were having lot of traffic issues but say, 'Work your way down, and once you have — we'll be talking enrollment.'" Reed said.

To advance the project, the council would have to certify the environmental analysis for Castilleja's modernization project; approve its request for a variance that allows the new buildings to exceed density regulations in the single-family neighborhood; and approve a new conditional use permit that governs, among other aspects, the school's enrollment numbers and the number of special events the school is allowed to have. While Castilleja had proposed 90 events per year, the planning commission recommended reducing it to 74, as well as having no events on Sundays and limiting the number of events on Saturday evenings to five per year.

They would also have to approve staff's finding that Castilleja's proposed underground garage is compliant with zoning, despite a general prohibition on underground garages in single-family neighborhoods (the prohibition, per code, is limited to residential uses).

Kauffman said that the school had proposed the garage after requests from neighbors early in the process. In 2013, neighbors were "adamant" that they wanted a garage, she said, and the school's modernization plan appeared to be a "non-starter" without a new facility.

Reed noted that while the garage was part of the earlier discussions, shuttles and off-site parking lots were a more popular alternative for the neighbors.

"The idea of digging this hole and filling it with polluting cement and building a bunker for storage of cars is not something that jives with Palo Alto's sustainability goals," Reed said.

The issue of trust came up repeatedly during the town hall discussion. Reed said it's been a "battle all the way" for the city to get Castilleja to comply with its existing conditional use permit, which limits enrollment to 415 students. After Castilleja exceeded that number, the city issued a $265,000 fine to the school and required it to gradually reduce its enrollment every year.

Kauffman said that the school has worked extremely hard to regain the trust of the community, which is why some of the neighbors who did not support the school's proposal before do so now.

"We think we've fought hard to earn the right to continue on the path that we're on," Kauffman said.

Comments

Cat
Registered user
Stanford
on Mar 13, 2021 at 12:50 am
Cat, Stanford
Registered user
on Mar 13, 2021 at 12:50 am

Millionaire neighborhood objects to
$50k a year school potentially adding traffic because it is “unfair.” Have they curtailed any of their own driving behavior?


Interested local
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Mar 13, 2021 at 3:33 pm
Interested local, Old Palo Alto
Registered user
on Mar 13, 2021 at 3:33 pm

Fact check: "Almost all students who arrive from afar do so by train, Kauffman said, and school staff are prohibited from getting to school through solo car commuting more than twice per week."

In the documents provided by the school to the City, the school says only 7% use the shuttle from CalTrain, 12% use a school bus, 2% walk. Overall, 49% of students arrive via their own cars.
See page 32 of this document: Web Link

Would you call this "spin" by Kaufman, or is it an outright fib? (Any wonder neighbors don't trust the school?)

The same chart shows that 59% of employees don't walk/bike/carpool/transit - which the report spins as a better percentage than office parks like SAP, Rubril, VISA (i.e. businesses with parking lots).

Other private schools have strict "NO driving to campus" policies, but Castilleja has stated it will not impose that restriction. Why?


Person
Registered user
Southgate
on Mar 15, 2021 at 7:40 pm
Person, Southgate
Registered user
on Mar 15, 2021 at 7:40 pm

Let's focus on the real situation: an elite private school wants favors from a city that is struggling to provide its own student population with the education properly afforded them and required by law. with students whose parents don't all pay, property taxes in Palo Alto, is asking for favors from a city that can't afford to grant them. Why would we, as a progressive community, support this upheaval for those with vast resources--most of whom don't even live in Palo Alto? Framing this as a "girls' education" problem/opportunity is just marketing. They have a large endowment and thus a variety of options for expanding their campus.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.