News

City changes direction on East Meadow bikeway

Council backs away from plan to remove parking spaces to create bike lanes

A cyclist bikes down East Meadow Drive in Palo Alto on July 14, 2021. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

Seeking to thread the needle between residents' wishes and grant requirements, Palo Alto advanced on Monday a plan to install bike improvements, including protected bikeways, along sections of East Meadow Drive, Fabian Way and Waverley Street.

But in a nod to the dozens of East Meadow residents who have opposed any plan that would take away 80 on-street parking spots for the new bike lanes, the City Council steered clear of the city's prior plan to install a protected bikeway along the entirety of the proposed route. Instead, council members unanimously agreed to a more modest — and far less contentious — set of improvements for the stretch of East Meadow between Middlefield Road and East Meadow Circle.

As opposed to removing parking spaces and installing protected bikeways, as initially proposed, the city is now looking to narrow the driving lanes on this section of East Meadow, taking them from 11 feet to 10 feet in width. The city also plans to add green paint to the bike lanes and to include stencils designating the area as a bike lane.

The revision in the project followed an outpouring of opposition from residents concerned about parking loss. Dozens had submitted letters opposing the project or attended a July 14 Planning and Transportation Commission meeting on the plan to lobby against protected bike lanes east of Middlefield Road. Some argued that eliminating parking spaces near Ramos Park would force families and children to walk across the street to enter the park.

Patricia Gibbs was one of many area residents who complained about being left out of the process. She urged the council and the planning commission to reject what she called an "dishonest, poorly executed plan" that she claimed ignored empirical evidence — namely, that the current configuration is perfectly safe. She suggested in a July letter that the proposal for protected lanes would "needlessly endanger cyclists and pedestrians /residents."

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Gibbs and her neighbors were far more sanguine about the new plan, which would preserve parking spaces. She submitted a letter of support for the latest version of the plan. And while some area residents said Monday that they had issues with the outreach process, most spoke in favor of the new project.

Robert Neff, who serves on the Palo Alto Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, said planning staff have "done a strong job of negotiating the path between the limitation of the original grant, which probably did have insufficient community input, and where we are today."

"I'm glad to see the transportation staff outreach is seeking to improve that and to get better community feedback as they go forward and incorporate that community feedback in what they're doing here," Neff said.

The rest of the south Palo Alto bike plan consists of broadly popular components: the widening of the Waverley Street path, which current stretches along a chain-link fence near Mitchell Park, and the installation of protected bike lanes on the Fabian Way, a car-heavy and notoriously hazardous stretch for bikers. Penny Ellson, a longtime advocate for bike improvements, was among those who lauded the proposed improvements to this stretch of south Palo Alto.

"Bike volumes are low on Fabian right now mainly because at this moment, it is a very awful environment to bicycle, even for someone like me, who is very comfortable in traffic. … This road is an excellent candidate for a road diet and protected bike lanes," Ellson said.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

In revising their proposal for the East Meadow segment, planning staff followed the direction from the planning commission, which recommended approving the south Palo Alto bike project but recommended that the city consider alternative designs for the segment of East Meadow Drive to minimize the loss of parking spaces.

The revision is not without risk. The bike project is being funded through a $919,000 grant from the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. When the city applied for the grant, it had indicated that the funding would be used to create protected bike lanes throughout the entire south Palo Alto segment. In July, transportation planners warned the planning commission that revising that scope and maintaining the status quo on a segment of East Meadow could prompt the VTA to withdraw the funding.

A component of the new south Palo Alto bike plan is the widening of the Waverley multiuse path, which runs along Mitchell Park. Rendering courtesy city of Palo Alto.

On Monday, the staff issued a far more hopeful assessment. Chief Transportation Official Philip Kamhi said that based on recent discussions with the VTA, staff now believes that it can consider other alternatives for that stretch of East Meadow.

"We believe through our discussion with them that we'd be able to get them to allow us to not do that in that segment if we were to put in traffic calming," Kamhi said.

Council members welcomed the compromise. Council member Alison Cormack lauded the project for improving public access from south Palo Alto to the city's new bike bridge over U.S. Highway 101. The structure at Adobe Creek is tentatively scheduled to open in late October.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

Vice Mayor Pat Burt called the new bikeway "a missing link" in commute routes to the many schools in the area, including JLS Middle School, Fairmeadow Elementary School and, farther west, Gunn High School. Sylvia Star-Lack, the city's transportation manager, noted that biking has become increasingly popular for local students. The percentage of JLS students who bike went up from 48% to 70% between 2009 and 2019. At Gunn High, the percentage went up from 33% to 50% over the same period.

"For this coming school year, later start times for JLS, Gunn and all our secondary schools could result in an even higher rate in biking and walking as parents' working schedules may no longer align with morning school drop-off which is now later," Stark-Lack said.

Burt suggested that the new project will benefit not just students but also south Palo Alto residents and employees in the North Bayshore area of Mountain View.

"I think it's going to really shift people even more to bicycling — for commuting and riding to school, and make it safer for both them and current riders," Burt said. "It's not about forcing anyone to ride. It's about making it attractive, safe and easy for people who would choose to ride."

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important city government news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

City changes direction on East Meadow bikeway

Council backs away from plan to remove parking spaces to create bike lanes

Seeking to thread the needle between residents' wishes and grant requirements, Palo Alto advanced on Monday a plan to install bike improvements, including protected bikeways, along sections of East Meadow Drive, Fabian Way and Waverley Street.

But in a nod to the dozens of East Meadow residents who have opposed any plan that would take away 80 on-street parking spots for the new bike lanes, the City Council steered clear of the city's prior plan to install a protected bikeway along the entirety of the proposed route. Instead, council members unanimously agreed to a more modest — and far less contentious — set of improvements for the stretch of East Meadow between Middlefield Road and East Meadow Circle.

As opposed to removing parking spaces and installing protected bikeways, as initially proposed, the city is now looking to narrow the driving lanes on this section of East Meadow, taking them from 11 feet to 10 feet in width. The city also plans to add green paint to the bike lanes and to include stencils designating the area as a bike lane.

The revision in the project followed an outpouring of opposition from residents concerned about parking loss. Dozens had submitted letters opposing the project or attended a July 14 Planning and Transportation Commission meeting on the plan to lobby against protected bike lanes east of Middlefield Road. Some argued that eliminating parking spaces near Ramos Park would force families and children to walk across the street to enter the park.

Patricia Gibbs was one of many area residents who complained about being left out of the process. She urged the council and the planning commission to reject what she called an "dishonest, poorly executed plan" that she claimed ignored empirical evidence — namely, that the current configuration is perfectly safe. She suggested in a July letter that the proposal for protected lanes would "needlessly endanger cyclists and pedestrians /residents."

Gibbs and her neighbors were far more sanguine about the new plan, which would preserve parking spaces. She submitted a letter of support for the latest version of the plan. And while some area residents said Monday that they had issues with the outreach process, most spoke in favor of the new project.

Robert Neff, who serves on the Palo Alto Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, said planning staff have "done a strong job of negotiating the path between the limitation of the original grant, which probably did have insufficient community input, and where we are today."

"I'm glad to see the transportation staff outreach is seeking to improve that and to get better community feedback as they go forward and incorporate that community feedback in what they're doing here," Neff said.

The rest of the south Palo Alto bike plan consists of broadly popular components: the widening of the Waverley Street path, which current stretches along a chain-link fence near Mitchell Park, and the installation of protected bike lanes on the Fabian Way, a car-heavy and notoriously hazardous stretch for bikers. Penny Ellson, a longtime advocate for bike improvements, was among those who lauded the proposed improvements to this stretch of south Palo Alto.

"Bike volumes are low on Fabian right now mainly because at this moment, it is a very awful environment to bicycle, even for someone like me, who is very comfortable in traffic. … This road is an excellent candidate for a road diet and protected bike lanes," Ellson said.

In revising their proposal for the East Meadow segment, planning staff followed the direction from the planning commission, which recommended approving the south Palo Alto bike project but recommended that the city consider alternative designs for the segment of East Meadow Drive to minimize the loss of parking spaces.

The revision is not without risk. The bike project is being funded through a $919,000 grant from the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. When the city applied for the grant, it had indicated that the funding would be used to create protected bike lanes throughout the entire south Palo Alto segment. In July, transportation planners warned the planning commission that revising that scope and maintaining the status quo on a segment of East Meadow could prompt the VTA to withdraw the funding.

On Monday, the staff issued a far more hopeful assessment. Chief Transportation Official Philip Kamhi said that based on recent discussions with the VTA, staff now believes that it can consider other alternatives for that stretch of East Meadow.

"We believe through our discussion with them that we'd be able to get them to allow us to not do that in that segment if we were to put in traffic calming," Kamhi said.

Council members welcomed the compromise. Council member Alison Cormack lauded the project for improving public access from south Palo Alto to the city's new bike bridge over U.S. Highway 101. The structure at Adobe Creek is tentatively scheduled to open in late October.

Vice Mayor Pat Burt called the new bikeway "a missing link" in commute routes to the many schools in the area, including JLS Middle School, Fairmeadow Elementary School and, farther west, Gunn High School. Sylvia Star-Lack, the city's transportation manager, noted that biking has become increasingly popular for local students. The percentage of JLS students who bike went up from 48% to 70% between 2009 and 2019. At Gunn High, the percentage went up from 33% to 50% over the same period.

"For this coming school year, later start times for JLS, Gunn and all our secondary schools could result in an even higher rate in biking and walking as parents' working schedules may no longer align with morning school drop-off which is now later," Stark-Lack said.

Burt suggested that the new project will benefit not just students but also south Palo Alto residents and employees in the North Bayshore area of Mountain View.

"I think it's going to really shift people even more to bicycling — for commuting and riding to school, and make it safer for both them and current riders," Burt said. "It's not about forcing anyone to ride. It's about making it attractive, safe and easy for people who would choose to ride."

Comments

Bystander
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 10, 2021 at 7:12 am
Bystander, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Aug 10, 2021 at 7:12 am

Why is this being proposed when our City says there is a budget crisis?

The shuttle is already gone and we have very little public transportation for localized commuting, yet putting green paint on the streets seems to be a good way of spending sparse city funds? How will this help the elderly who have given up their cars? How will this help those with poor vision?

If money is spent on this then it shows the City has more money than they are letting on.


Consider Your Options.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 10, 2021 at 1:35 pm
Consider Your Options. , Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Aug 10, 2021 at 1:35 pm

1). The money is coming from a grant.

2). What Penny Ellson actually said was that she thought the post-Covid data collection would probably would show that Fabian is an excellent candidate for a road diet. We are all waiting for that data to understand what is possible.

Since retaining parking will prevent providing a buffered space to keep bikers safe from the dangerous door zone, I hope we auto users will all learn the Dutch Reach, a simple habit that all drivers in the Netherlands are required to learn to help mitigate dooring hazard. See Web Link .


Consider Your Options.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 10, 2021 at 1:43 pm
Consider Your Options. , Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Aug 10, 2021 at 1:43 pm

If you want bus service in Palo Alto, write to VTA, our regional bus transit agency. That is where your transit tax dollars go.

The former Shuttle was partly funded by Caltrain because the schedule was designed to get folks to the trains on schedule. It was cancelled because people stopped using transit during Covid and the city was compelled by revenue reductions to make deep budget cuts in funding for many services. The likelihood we'll ever get that Caltrain funding back is not good.

These issues are complicated. Rather than complain, get informed and get active. That is how democracy works. The power resides with the people-- if we exercise that power.


Online Name
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Aug 10, 2021 at 1:58 pm
Online Name, Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
Registered user
on Aug 10, 2021 at 1:58 pm

Re how democracy works, during last night's City Council meeting there was a discussion of the upcoming utility rate hikes -- 3% this year and 5% for EACH of the next two years. The city attorney said that if 11,000 utility customers protested the rate hikes, the city *might* reconsider.

How realistic is it to hope that 11,000 people will write to the City Clerk to find out the correct procedure to protest these increases? Protesting the increases isn't even a one-step process!

We're still waiting for the refunds for the lawsuit over the PA Utilities overcharging us $20,000,000 each and every year for the last 5 or so years.


William Hitchens
Registered user
Mountain View
on Aug 10, 2021 at 3:17 pm
William Hitchens, Mountain View
Registered user
on Aug 10, 2021 at 3:17 pm

Other than lane narrowing, my main gripe with protected bikeways is the high curbs. If the bikeway is badly designed, then the curbs extend too close to driveways and intersections and it is far too easy to run over the curb and damage a wheel or a tire while trying to make a LEGAL right turn --- while keeping an eye out for bikes zooming up on the right side of the car. It would be better if those curb ends were gently tapered at their ends to lessen damage to cars.


Native to the BAY
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Aug 10, 2021 at 4:13 pm
Native to the BAY, Old Palo Alto
Registered user
on Aug 10, 2021 at 4:13 pm

I bet the same "neighbors" who want to keep and protect the public right away with their private 5 auto public gutter strip are the same ilk who wish to take residential parking away from multi-family developments and vote away affordable housing screaming, "traffic!" The selfish irony in this town is overwhelming practicality, science, and climate change ! So NMBYism is loud and clear ... taxing the poor who have zilch, all to save the rich who want to keep everything. Oh yeah and the children (the large percentage of bicyclists here can't vote so their voices are kept pejoratively silent, although the high numbers can't lie). Even when voting residents cover their eyes the manipulation play is so apparent. The road furniture in this town are cars and this object and its owner keep it KING. Sad day for our Mother Earth.


StarSpring
Registered user
Adobe-Meadow
on Aug 11, 2021 at 9:07 am
StarSpring, Adobe-Meadow
Registered user
on Aug 11, 2021 at 9:07 am

umm... Fabian goes from nowhere to nowhere. i walk that road almost every day and I don't remember ever seeing a bicycle.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.