With Palo Alto looking to add police officers and replace its police chief, the city's independent police auditor is preparing to scrutinize the department's hiring and recruiting practices.
The City Council will consider on Monday approving a $25,000 contract with OIR Group to evaluate how the Palo Alto Police Department's recruiting and hiring standards "reflect contemporary thinking about candidate eligibility, suitability and potential," according to a new report from City Manager Ed Shikada. Police auditors are also scheduled to give an update to the council about recent use-of-force incidents and complaints filed against police officers.
If approved, the auditing firm's review will come a time of transition for the department, which lost about 30 budgeted positions since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and saw its staffing levels drop from 155 positions to 125, according to the city budget. While the budget currently includes 79 sworn officer positions, Chief Robert Jonsen said last month that because of injuries and attrition, the city only has 59 sworn officers available.
The council signaled its intention to bolster police staffing levels when it adopted "Community Health and Safety" as one of its priorities last month, a category that includes responding to a recent uptick in burglaries and other crimes throughout the city. Council members also authorized Jonsen on Feb. 7 to recruit new five officers and to hire a new deputy director for the Technical Services Division, a move that will free up another officer for patrol duties.
The city is also preparing to recruit a new police chief, with Jonsen announcing his plans to retire this summer and launching a campaign to replace Santa Clara County Sheriff Laurie Smith. City Manager Ed Shikada told this news organization that while Jonsen's retirement is scheduled for July, he will be off-duty starting in mid-June. On Thursday night, the Human Relations Commission will hold the first in a series of "listening sessions" to solicit community feedback on a new chief. The second and third sessions will be held on March 19 and 31.
The leadership change will come at a time when the Police Department has been facing heavy scrutiny and lawsuits stemming from numerous violent arrests. One retired officer, Wayne Benitez, is currently facing misdemeanor charges for slamming the head of a resident Gustavo Alvarez on a car windshield during an arrest at the Buena Vista Mobile Home Park in 2018, an incident that led to a $572,500 settlement. Another officer, Thomas DeStefano, left the department last September after being named in numerous lawsuits, the most recent one involving an arrest in front of Happy Donuts in 2019 that left the victim, Julio Arevalo, with a shattered orbital bone. The city also approved a $135,000 settlement in January with Joel Alejo, a Mountain View resident who was attacked by a Palo Alto police dog while he was sleeping in a shed during a police manhunt for a kidnapping suspect.
The department also saw tension within its ranks, with a group of six officers suing the city last year over a Black Lives Matter mural that the City Council commissioned in 2020 as part of its effort to promote racial equity and diversity in the aftermath of George Floyd's killing by a Minneapolis police officer. The mural included an image of Assata Shakur, a former member of the Black Liberation Army who became a fugitive after she was convicted of shooting a state trooper in 1973. Last week, a Santa Clara County Superior Court judge ruled against the officers after rejecting their assertion that the city's failure to immediately remove the mural constituted an "averse action" that discriminates against officers, who are not considered a "protective class." One of the six officers involved in the suit, Christopher Moore, retired last August and issued a public letter that sharply criticized Jonsen and other department leaders.
The proposed review of department hiring and recruiting practices would signify yet another expansion in OIR Group's oversight role in Palo Alto. Last year, the council empowered the auditor to review more types of use-of-force incidents, including ones in which an officer uses a baton, a chemical agent, a less-lethal projectile or a canine, as well as internal conflicts within the department that involve discrimination, harassment or retaliation.
OIR Group released its first report under the expanded scope last month. It also issued last week a sheet summarizing the outcomes of 10 cases that it had reviewed. In seven of these, the auditor concluded either that the complaints were unfounded or that no misconduct was identified. One of these cases involved an officer who wasn't wearing a mask coughed next to a man and made a glib reference to COVID-19; he received verbal counseling but was not cited for violating any department policies.
In three other cases, OIR Group identified flaws in the conduct of department employees. The auditor concluded that a police dispatcher deviated from protocol during the department's delayed response to a medical emergency in Barron Park in 2020. And in the Alejo incident, the auditor found that the officer's failure to issue a warning or identify himself as an officer was "problematic" but did not rise to the level of a policy violation.
The only incident in which a complaint against an officer was sustained was an internal complaint that involved a patrol officer whose girlfriend joined him on a ride-along and used the computer terminal in the police car to query her own name. In reviewing the case, department supervisors also heard a conversation in which the officer alluded to use of illegal drugs at a recent party.
The officer was placed on administrative leave during the investigation and later disciplined for the inappropriate database entry, according to OIR. The audit also noted that the department could not make the determination that the officer used illegal drugs, though it concluded that his attendance at the party and "tacit endorsement'' of other people's illegal activities constituted a policy violation.
Comments
Registered user
Menlo Park
on Mar 10, 2022 at 10:42 am
Registered user
on Mar 10, 2022 at 10:42 am
It is clear from the news that the wrong people are being hired by police departments. Applicants need to be screened to eliminate people who would be bad policemen. We need to make sure that those who are hired are ones who want to serve and protect, not beat up on people. They also need to be trained to de-escalate tense situations and to call in mental-health experts when appropriate.
Registered user
Palo Alto High School
on Mar 10, 2022 at 12:15 pm
Registered user
on Mar 10, 2022 at 12:15 pm
There are bad hires in every company; there is incompetence everywhere. I bet everyone could name at least one in their company who should be fired. Police work just has more visibility. Those who criticize law enforcement are too cowardly to choose the career. I support law and order and our police forces; I want to feel safe and I appreciate them. People have to realize that they are humans making split second decisions, not robocops. When people support the rights of criminals over law enforcement officials, that is lunacy.
Registered user
Midtown
on Mar 10, 2022 at 1:24 pm
Registered user
on Mar 10, 2022 at 1:24 pm
To the person commenting that:
"There are bad hires in every company, as well as incompetence"
While the statement (above) is generally true; well run companies weed out incompetence and bad hires on a continuous basis, and constantly review and modify hiring practices in accord with their findings.
Registered user
Professorville
on Mar 10, 2022 at 2:07 pm
Registered user
on Mar 10, 2022 at 2:07 pm
Congrats to the City Council. In addition Robert Johnsen should not be allowed to hire anyone as he cannot be trusted.
The new police chief should do all the hiring.
Registered user
College Terrace
on Mar 11, 2022 at 8:16 am
Registered user
on Mar 11, 2022 at 8:16 am
This is a good move and a practice that should be undertaken even when there aren't questionable incidents and reasons for concern, in order to assure that high standards are maintained. As for incompetence, while it may exist in every company, there are only a handful of industries in which incompetence has the potential to kill.
I also think the suggestion that Jonsen not be involved in the hiring process is a good one. This is unfortunate, but since the problems have risen to the point that CC has acknowledged the need for an audit of hiring practices it makes sense that there be a barrier between the outgoing and the incoming. There's a good, ethical officer in Menlo Park who has Palo Alto roots and who will have the best interests of Palo Alto in mind since his parents live here. Perhaps he could be invited to either consult or to interview the finalists seeking to lead PAPD.
Registered user
Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Mar 11, 2022 at 8:46 am
Registered user
on Mar 11, 2022 at 8:46 am
(1) In the interest of gun safety & to prevent contested shootings, all police officers should be required to enter a security code prior to discharging their firearms.
(2) A civilian review board consisting of Palo Alto residents and police reform advocates should also be a part of the screening process.
(3) And any alleged affiliation with white nationalist/supremacist groups should be grounds for immediate disqualification.
(3)
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Mar 11, 2022 at 9:42 am
Registered user
on Mar 11, 2022 at 9:42 am
I agree with all the above calls to keep Johnsen out of future hiring decisions, especially since the high cost of settling police misconduct cases are due to the repeated misconduct of the same problem cops. The Washing Post just concluded an in-depth study on the high costs of police misconduct that's well worth the read. Web Link
I'm particularly appalled that PAPD continues to stonewall media inquiries when WE get stuck paying for their misconduct AND under-reporting of crimes.