As Palo Alto plans for a housing boom on San Antonio Road, a property owner in the area is pitching a proposal to build a residential development for seniors on a site currently occupied by a boxing gym.
The project, which is proposed by Rachelle Cagampan, would replace Mayweather Boxing and Fitness at 824 San Antonio Road with a four-story building that contains 22 dwellings and an eight-bed skilled nursing facility. The residential units would consist of 13 independent senior dwelling units, one owner's unit and eight assisted living units, according to the application.
The development is one of three residential projects eyeing a portion of San Antonio that has traditionally been dedicated to commercial and industrial uses. The City Council has already approved a 102-apartment complex at a nearby site at 788 San Antonio Road. And earlier this month, it expressed support for a 75-condominium proposal at 800 San Antonio Road. Much like those projects, Cagampan's proposal for 824 San Antonio exceeds existing development standards and would require a zone change to get built.
The project's proposed density of 50 dwelling units per acre is higher than the city typically allows and the applicant is seeking to construct the development under the city's recently established "housing incentive program," a zoning mechanism that loosens zoning rules for qualifying residential projects and paves the way for expedited approval.
"The design seeks to take advantage of the recent adoption of the Housing Incentive Program applied to this neighborhood after recent approval of a nearby development on San Antonio, and expand quality housing for a much needed population," the project architect, Leah Bayer of Architects FORA, wrote to the city.
If approved, the 53,885-square-foot building near East Charleston Road would include retail space on the ground floor and an underground parking garage. The ground floor would include a lounge, a library, a gym and a technology room for the building's tenants while the second floor would have the nursing facility and the assisted living units.
Cagampan had filed her application in late 2021 and her team has been refining the proposal, completing the mandated geotechnical and arborist studies and working out the details with the city's planning staff. She resubmitted the application last month.
The project comes at a time when the city is considering zone changes to spur more housing on the eastern portion of San Antonio, close to U.S. Highway 101. On Aug. 22, council members supported including in the city's Housing Element a policy that would allow up to 90 dwelling units per acre at sites along San Antonio that are currently zoned for manufacturing, well above what the city currently allows in any zoning district and far higher than what planning staff had recommended.
The city's housing plan also calls for expanding the Housing Incentive Program, which is currently limited to El Camino Real and San Antonio Road, to other parts of the city and to revise it to add residential builders more incentives. The council also acknowledged, however, that the area around San Antonio faces significant constraints: poor bicycling amenities, no public transportation and a lack of neighborhood serving retail.
In discussing adding housing on San Antonio Road, Mayor Pat Burt said that the city will need to work with the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority to add a bus line to San Antonio and to collaborate with neighboring Mountain View to make sure that new residential projects on both sides of the border have adequate shopping amenities.
"I'd like to see a good portion of housing in these areas but we can't just drop in big housing buildings and not have the other elements there," Burt said at the Aug. 22 discussion.
Comments
Registered user
Barron Park
on Aug 30, 2022 at 11:13 am
Registered user
on Aug 30, 2022 at 11:13 am
Senior housing at sites that puts seniors in the outskirts of the city is cruel and mean. Why can't we have our seniors closer to downtown areas. It is disrespectful to their service to our city over the years. It reminds me of when I worked at a mental health center that was placed up on a hill far from the center of town. The constraints are too many and unfair.
Registered user
Crescent Park
on Aug 30, 2022 at 11:15 am
Registered user
on Aug 30, 2022 at 11:15 am
"Why can't we have our seniors closer to downtown areas."
^ The land is too expensive.
In a perfect world, only the homeless suffering from mental illness and/or substance abuse should be isolated from the mainstream population.
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Aug 30, 2022 at 11:23 am
Registered user
on Aug 30, 2022 at 11:23 am
There's something ironic that they keep destroying retail and restaurants to build housing and then complain about lack of amenities. (And of course cutting sales tax revenues.)
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 30, 2022 at 1:07 pm
Registered user
on Aug 30, 2022 at 1:07 pm
Where is the Area Plan? These are adding up to some real numbers in an area that already is very auto congested and lacking community service capacity and infrastructure for transit, bike, and pedestrian options to support higher density. These units are replacing community-serving businesses. Cubberley has been allowed to fall into disrepair by PAUSD and the city, so capacity for services is not in place. The Area Plan should come first, or at least with, but not after, the housing is approved and built. This looks like knee-jerk reaction to developer demands, not thoughtfully planned development. Here are the numbers, totaled up:
Development Recently Built, Approved, or in the Pipeline for East Charleston and San Antonio
75 Condos (800 San Antonio Road)
76 housing units (1237 San Antonio-Home Key transitional housing for unhoused people)
102 apartments -788 San Antonio
50 apartments (525 E. Charleston – 100% affordable, 10 parking spaces)
249 room hotel (744-750 San Antonio—Marriott hotels)
22 senior units plus 8 nursing beds (figure one room for each two nursing beds at 824 San Antonio Road)
578 TOTAL hotel rooms and units
A plan is needed ASAP.
Registered user
Green Acres
on Aug 30, 2022 at 1:09 pm
Registered user
on Aug 30, 2022 at 1:09 pm
"the second floor would have the nursing facility and the assisted living units."
I hope they install large elevators that don't break down -- it's hard to use stairs in a walker or wheelchair.
Registered user
Duveneck/St. Francis
on Aug 30, 2022 at 5:55 pm
Registered user
on Aug 30, 2022 at 5:55 pm
What about low-income seniors? No where does it say anything about low-income. So, it will be another expensive (as most are) senior home.
Registered user
Adobe-Meadow
on Aug 30, 2022 at 6:23 pm
Registered user
on Aug 30, 2022 at 6:23 pm
It sounds like piling on to us folks down here in SPA. The rich and famous get to live in North Palo Alto...far away from us middle income/class folks who try to eke out a living or enjoy a life of retirement in a formerly great part of town...with friendly neighbors.
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Aug 30, 2022 at 8:56 pm
Registered user
on Aug 30, 2022 at 8:56 pm
The Mayfield agreement was a total sham. 71 Units at Cal Ave & ECR opened in 2017. Great location, sort of. Stanford traded land for a Soccer Field our residents can’t use. Green, open space too far for kiddo’s to cross ECR for play and fresh air. Housing built of concrete on concrete by Seque Construction. Appliances low bottom, broken, cupboard fronts loose and unsafe, cheapest laminate flooring . Parking lift broken. No on site community room access open during the day. 4 managers in 5 years. 7 washers for 150 residents including seniors and babies. One of four boilers owork. Water is Luke warm. Tons of unnecessary paperwork to put in bathroom grab bars. Trash chutes have maggots and ants. No additional storage onsite. Families pay other Co’s for storage units burdening thier housing costs. Related raises 11% rent yearly. Cheap chalk wall paint. Doors made of cardboard. Stanford traded for 265 upscale Stanford Terrace up the hill. Yet. Cambridge a ghost town of boarded up buildings and empty surface lots. And yes the elevator breaks here. BTW Mayfield is all polish on the exterior and schlock construction inside. Plus is on VTA, Train line and next to grocery. However PA and Stanford would prefer to forget about Mayfield residents. Poor, service working families. Day care providers, pool cleaners, construction, cashiers, hair cutters, hospital care givers. Give housing life 2 humans by the quality in which it’s built and it’s location. Be a leader not a lagger. Renters unite! These posts give me hope.