In a bid to combat retail thefts and brazen robberies, Palo Alto is preparing to turn to a tool that in the past has sparked concern from privacy advocates: automated license plate readers.
The City Council will discuss on Monday a proposal from the Police Department to place cameras on fixed locations throughout the city to capture license plate data of passing vehicles. The goal would be to help officers identify stolen vehicles, track cars involved in crimes and help investigators locate perpetrators once a crime has occurred, according to a report from the department.
Automated license plate readers aren't entirely new to Palo Alto. Since 2013, the Police Department has employed one license plate reader, which is mounted on top of a patrol car. And various private entities, including Stanford Shopping Center, currently have fixed license plate readers installed, according to the report. The technology is also in use in various nearby cities, including Menlo Park, Atherton, Los Altos Hills and Santa Clara.
One of the key functions of automated license plate readers (a term that refers to both the cameras and the software that is used to transmit information) is their ability to issue real-time alerts whenever a vehicle that is associated with a crime passes by. The camera captures images of the vehicle's rear license plate and alerts the police if a stolen or wanted vehicle passes by.
Once the alert is issued, officers are required to visually confirm the plate number and check it against law enforcement databases to ensure accuracy before they make an enforcement stop, the report states. It characterizes the technology as a "cost-effective force multiplier."
"The use of fixed ALPR technology has become widespread in the region and is being used by many local police agencies to successfully locate stolen vehicles and solve other crimes where a vehicle has been used," the report states. "In recent years, ALPR technology has continued to evolve in terms of quality and accuracy, while also becoming less cost-prohibitive."
The recommendation comes at a time when the Police Department is gradually restoring its staffing following severe cuts in 2020. Before the cuts, the department had 92 sworn officer positions, Police Chief Andrew Binder said in a recent interview. Last fall, the council authorized restoring some of these positions. Even so, the department currently has 84 budgeted positions. Of those, more than five are vacant, he said.
Police staffing has also emerged as an issue in the November election, with nearly all council candidates supporting adding police staffing. One candidate, Ed Lauing, has made public safety a campaign priority while another, Alex Comsa, has specifically called for adoption of technology like automated license plate readers.
Voters will also weigh in on Measure K, a business tax, and Measure L, which would reaffirm the city's policy of transferring revenues from the gas utility to the general fund. Measure K specifically designates public safety as one of the three areas that would be supported through the business tax. Measure L has no such restrictions but it lists police as one of the areas that would be funded by the transferred revenues.
While violent crime remains uncommon in Palo Alto, the city has seen an uptick in burglaries and larcenies in recent years. According to police statistics, larceny remains by far the most common crime, with 1,356 cases in 2021, 1,571 cases in 2020 and 1,724 in 2019. In 2018, the number of larceny cases was 1,191.
Binder said in an interview that the biggest issue that the department is dealing with is property crime and the challenge of addressing the issue with existing personnel. He also noted that while violent crimes are rare, they get a lot of headlines.
"That's not lost on us. That makes people in our community feel unsafe," he said.
But while the Police Department's report highlights the advantages of adopting automated license plate readers, without proper safeguards the technology can lead to privacy intrusions, diminished trust in law enforcement and litigation, according to a report from the American Civil Liberties Union of California. In 2016, the ACLU issued a guide for cities looking to adopt surveillance technology. It recommends that cities pursuing such technology engage in a robust community engagement effort before adoption, clearly identify the purpose of the new technology and its costs and legal risks and consider ways in which the technology could negatively impact individual rights.
"The community at large can pay a heavy price if surveillance technology is acquired and deployed without evaluating its impact on civil rights and its potential for misuse," the ACLU report states. "Surveillance can easily intrude upon the individual rights of residents and visitors, perpetuate discriminatory policing, or chill freedom of expression, association, and religion — freedoms that public officials are sworn to protect. As a result, surveillance can erode trust in law enforcement, making it harder for officers and community members to work together to keep the community safe."
If the council opts to move ahead with installation of automated license plate readers, the department estimates that the technology would cost between $75,000 and $200,000 in the first year and between $50,000 and $150,000 in every year thereafter. Palo Alto police have reviewed the ACLU's report on surveillance technology and have invited ACLU representatives to discuss their concerns about license plate readers, the Police Department report states. To date, the organization has not been able to accommodate the city's request, according to the report.
To address the issues identified by the ACLU, the department has proposed a retention period of 30 days for license plate data for all vehicles except those identified as relevant to specific criminal investigations (other jurisdictions, the report notes, have a retention period of one year or more). Data would be encrypted and stored by a third party. Access to the data would only be granted to trained staff with legitimate law enforcement audits and all queries would be logged and subject to audit, the report states.
In advocating for license plate readers, the Police Department points to regional increases in catalytic converter thefts, auto burglaries, vehicle thefts and organized retail thefts. Those who commit the crimes, the report notes, often use a vehicle to travel to and flee from the scene.
"Identifying stolen or wanted vehicles, via fixed ALPR, as they enter a target area provides law enforcement an opportunity to intervene before additional crimes are committed, and potentially apprehend wanted persons or recover stolen property," the report states. "ALPR data also provides investigators with an additional technique to identify, locate and apprehend offenders once a crime has already occurred."
Comments
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Oct 20, 2022 at 10:01 am
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 10:01 am
If the city needs funds for the license plate readers, let them start by killing the $144,000,000 plans for fiber to the home which could result in "catastrophic losses" if residents aren't convinced that PA can develop and manage a service competitive to those offered by big, experienced commercial operators.
Registered user
College Terrace
on Oct 20, 2022 at 10:12 am
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 10:12 am
Such a bummer that we live in times where bad players make life less free-flowing, less safe, less secure, less peaceful. I’m sure that’s been true forever but everything is accelerated and intensified in the electronic age. Since there’s a privacy aspect to this the program needs to be carefully administered.
Registered user
Community Center
on Oct 20, 2022 at 10:55 am
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 10:55 am
Gennady, thanks for writing this timely article and highlighting the positives and negatives. I think it provides a good summary.
Registered user
Evergreen Park
on Oct 20, 2022 at 11:05 am
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 11:05 am
If this technology is adopted, I sincerely hope the City will not contract with the same firm they have used to provide LPR technology for RPP parking enforcement.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 20, 2022 at 11:08 am
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 11:08 am
From many of the local crime issues, we hear that the getaway car is a stolen car or one with stolen plates.
Will this increase the incidents of car thefts as thieves look for getaway vehicles. Or will they just steal license plates?
Registered user
Barron Park
on Oct 20, 2022 at 11:09 am
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 11:09 am
As Sheyner points out, property crime continues to increase in Palo Alto because we're an "asset rich target." Palo Alto should acquire these license plate readers and install them throughout the city, to catch criminals and prevent crime by making Palo Alto unsafe for criminals. Their cost-effectiveness is not in dispute.
Furthermore, the police should install license plate readers on all their cars (they have only 1 at present). This will allow them to prevent criminal activity in real time, catching criminals that are driving stolen cars or cars with stolen or removed license plates.
Finally, Sheyner makes his obligatory nod to the ACLU, which considers any use of CCTV to be a violation of the 4th amendment ("right to privacy"). We should be far past that nonsense, which only acts to protect criminals and interfere with police efforts to protect citizens from both property crimes and crimes of violence.
Registered user
College Terrace
on Oct 20, 2022 at 11:17 am
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 11:17 am
@BarronParkerToo: you are correct. We’ve been victimized twice by smash and dash. I believe cameras would deter such crimes.
Registered user
Downtown North
on Oct 20, 2022 at 12:36 pm
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 12:36 pm
I wholeheartedly support the installation of license plate readers!
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 20, 2022 at 1:16 pm
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 1:16 pm
@DTN Paul
“I wholeheartedly support the installation of license plate readers!”
Ditto.
As for the ACLU, why would cameras not be allowed when we all have them on our doorbells for the purpose of catching thieves or other delinquencies. Cameras are all over Europe where privacy matters too and they go after online privacy intrusion businesses. The ACLU should go and fight the privacy bandits online instead of fighting towns trying to manage safety for citizens.
Registered user
Midtown
on Oct 20, 2022 at 2:05 pm
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 2:05 pm
I am a monthly contributor to the ACLU and generally find myself approving of cases they become involved with. In this case I disagree. I have no problem with the police taking a picture of my license plate since I don't plan on any criminal activities.
Registered user
Downtown North
on Oct 20, 2022 at 2:52 pm
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 2:52 pm
For what it's worth, the ACLU is worried about rampant tracking of people and their cars, with broad consolidation and sharing of the location data. Imagine there's a company that compiles the license plate data from many different governments, and then they start selling that data. Something like that. It's certainly plausible, though I think there are ways to prevent it.
In the meantime, criminals are stealing cars and licence plates, and committing blatant and brazen crimes in Palo Alto and other cities. I think that's a real threat, vs what is a somewhat hypothetical future threat.
Registered user
Ventura
on Oct 20, 2022 at 5:37 pm
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 5:37 pm
100% Support having license plate readers, with a MUST have provision:
The data retention shall be expiring after a short period, something like 7-30 days. And the data shall not be used for anything other than active police investigations (or identification of stolen vehicles). No data selling. No data mining.
This will help (1) prevent crimes as criminals will be more likely to get caught, (2) solve crimes that happened recently, (3) preserve privacy.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 20, 2022 at 5:43 pm
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 5:43 pm
License plate readers are on all the bridges and Fastrak lanes. No big deal to get them elsewhere.
Except it will encourage thieve to steal cars and plates so that they don't have to use their own vehicles. My suspicious nature tells me that more crime rather than less crime will occur.
Registered user
another community
on Oct 20, 2022 at 6:44 pm
Registered user
on Oct 20, 2022 at 6:44 pm
We have license plate readers in our town, and its money well spent. The crime rate hasn't increased or decreased. If cameras deterred crime, would there be bank robberies and shoplifting? We live in a very low crime town, and there will always be crime.
License plate readers are a tool for law enforcement after the fact. Catching criminals.
Bystander bring ups a good point about stolen plates and vehicles. Criminals will steal plates and vehicles with or without cameras. They don't care.
As far as privacy, there is no expectation of privacy in public. It's something we all give up the minute we walk out the front door.
Registered user
Green Acres
on Oct 21, 2022 at 8:22 am
Registered user
on Oct 21, 2022 at 8:22 am
Perhaps this could be funded as part of Palo Alto's plan to cut greenhouse emissions by 2030. Installation of readers along with an education program could get thieves to walk, ride bikes, or take public transit to and from their crimes.
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Oct 22, 2022 at 2:17 pm
Registered user
on Oct 22, 2022 at 2:17 pm
@mondoman like a more sustainable safe route to crime, bike way ? I am looking forward to a bicycle licensing reader to get some traction. The silicon micro chip has provided inhumane, unearthly gifts for shareholders and start-ups stock dividends .
Registered user
Duveneck/St. Francis
on Oct 27, 2022 at 5:39 pm
Registered user
on Oct 27, 2022 at 5:39 pm
Well-written article, Gennady. I don't have much of a problem with the civil rights aspect of this as long as the program is closely managed and data security is maintained. Heck, if you've got a Fastrak in your car, you already are being tracked. I have no idea how secure that data is.
But some people believe that this is a cure-all measure for petty crime. It is certainly not. What I do think is that a certain amount of money should be spent on publicizing the presence of LPR's. Most cat thieves driving around at 3am likely don't know or don't care. Some well-placed permanent signage would be in order.