Parents are upset and looking for answers after the Palo Alto Unified School District announced this week that classes serving students with moderate to severe disabilities at two elementary schools will be shuttered and relocated to different campuses next school year
Ohlone and Escondido elementary schools will each no longer have a moderate/severe special education class starting this fall. They will be relocated to Nixon and Barron Park elementary schools, respectively.
The decision came as a surprise to families when it was announced during a Zoom call on Feb. 6, three Ohlone parents told the Weekly. Lars Smith was in "complete and utter disbelief" when he logged onto the call and found out his son's class would no longer exist at the school next year. Yaroslava Krivokon had a similar reaction.
"(It was) extremely upsetting," Krivokon said. "I had to turn off the video on the call and mute myself. I could not hold it together."
Both Smith and Krivokon have other children who also attend Ohlone and told the Weekly that they moved to live near the school.
Director of Special Education Amanda Boyce told the Weekly that she knows the consolidation can be hard in the short term but said that it is in the students' best interest.
Escondido, Ohlone, Nixon and Barron Park each currently have one moderate/severe special education class, serving students across all grade levels. By consolidating at Nixon and Barron Park, each campus will be able to have two classrooms: one serving students in second grade and below, the other serving third through fifth graders, Boyce said.
"As a special education department, we've long been looking at wanting to consolidate the programs," Boyce said. "There's no doubt that kids will be better served in either cluster of K-2 or 3-5."
Families were told on Thursday, Feb. 9, that they weren't locked into attending Nixon or Barron Park but could request to move to one of the other three campuses with a moderate/severe program: Walter Hays, Fairmeadow and El Carmelo, according to an email that a parent shared with the Weekly. The district's other elementary schools already don't have a moderate/severe program.
Programs for students with mild to moderate disabilities will remain in operation on all elementary school campuses, Boyce said.
While some parents say that they can appreciate administrators' reasoning for the moderate/severe consolidation — grouping students with similar needs — what they don't understand is the way district staff went about it. Neither parents nor special education teachers were included in the decision-making process.
"What I want to know is why did they think that the most harsh, punitive and undemocratic way of doing this was the way to do it?" Smith said.
Ohlone parent Emily Lee similarly objected to the lack of consultation with parents.
"I'm gravely disappointed in this decision," Lee said. "It was just made without any transparency."
Boyce acknowledged that parents weren't included in the decision-making process and defended that choice.
"I'll tell you the truth — and I appreciate this as a former elementary school principal — every parent loves their community," Boyce said. "Had we gone out to those different schools, we would have heard how much every family loves their community. There's something very special and unique about every elementary school, but there's also a lot of similarities."
Special education teachers similarly weren't involved in making the consolidation decision and were informed of the change on Feb. 6, Boyce said, although she noted that teachers had long advocated for split-grade classes.
District staff instead relied on a set of guiding principles to make the decision, including looking at enrollment in different areas of the district, classroom and campus space, and minimizing classes spanning all grade levels, Boyce said.
While parents weren't involved in the decision, Boyce said that she shared the plans, without naming the affected schools, at a Jan. 23 meeting of the Community Advisory Committee for Special Education in Palo Alto, which is a volunteer group that advocates for families of students in the special education program.
Boyce also said that possible changes to special education were mentioned in an update sent to families last month from Superintendent Don Austin and that the topic has been scheduled for the school board to hear about at a Feb. 14 meeting.
Austin's mention of the topic came on Jan. 20 as part of his weekly update message. He wrote that the district was looking at consolidating some elementary school special education programs but that the district team was still in the "exploration stage." There was no reference to the moderate/severe program or specific school sites.
The board's tentative calendar of items for future meetings has included a bullet point under the Feb. 14 meeting about a "program restructuring" for elementary school special education. Further details weren't released until the full agenda was posted on Friday, Feb. 10. The item is listed on the agenda as a "staff report," with a note that no board action is required.
Parents told the Weekly that they plan to attend the meeting and object to the change. Krivokon also started a petition urging the board to reverse the decision, which had close to 200 signatures as of Friday evening, Feb. 10.
Krivokon said that having to switch schools would be a big disruption for her autistic daughter, who is in kindergarten. After enjoying preschool at Greendell School, Krivokon said that the adjustment to Ohlone was a challenge, with her daughter crying every morning before school. It was only right before winter break that things got smoother.
"Starting at Ohlone was tough. Even though she was excited to be with her brother and sister, it was hard," Krivokon said. "Now she's finally enjoying it and it's going to start all over in another six months."
Parents have also objected to the fact that two schools with choice programs are the ones impacted by the change. Choice programs have specialized offerings and require parents to apply for their children to attend.
Ohlone focuses on an "open school" philosophy, including open-ended activities and peer tutoring, as well as having a farm on campus. Escondido includes a Spanish dual-immersion choice program.
"It is very telling to me that these special education kids are being yanked from Palo Alto's choice schools," Lee said, noting that they are sometimes called the "crown jewels" of the district.
According to Boyce, the fact that both schools have choice programs wasn't a factor in the decision. She also said that all elementary schools follow consistent best practices. Instead, Boyce said that it was about geographically spreading the moderate/severe programs throughout the district.
Parents have raised particular objections to the decision to move Ohlone students to Nixon. The two schools are across the district from one another, with a roughly 3.5-mile drive in between.
"I'm sure Nixon is a wonderful school, but it's not near anything," Smith said.
Administrators considered the district in three "clusters": north, south and west, Boyce said. Currently, the district's seven moderate/severe programs are split between Walter Hays in the north; El Carmelo, Fairmeadow and Ohlone in the south; and Barron Park, Nixon and Escondido in the west. With the consolidation, there will be Walter Hays in the north; El Carmelo and Fairmeadow in the south; and Barron Park and Nixon in the west. Boyce added that all the students are offered the option to be bused from their home to school and back.
Some parents have also raised questions about whether the district's decision to stop offering the moderate/severe program at Ohlone and Escondido without parent input violates the law. The individualized education program (IEP) that guides the services each special education student receives includes information about a student's placement, Smith said, and districts are required to collaborate with parents to develop IEPs. According to Boyce, IEPs detail services, goals and programs for each student but don't require placement at a particular school.
Comments
Registered user
Downtown North
on Feb 10, 2023 at 11:20 pm
Registered user
on Feb 10, 2023 at 11:20 pm
Special Education increases its power by consolidating classrooms at fewer schools. They have also created their own Special Education school at Cubberley where students with Autism and Mental Health needs are segregated into separate campuses. By removing students from neighborhood schools, Special Education grows its power and control while reducing enrollment at neighborhood schools.
Be assured the district consulted their attorney to ensure they could make changes with no parent input. Lots of meaningless quotes from the district. Ms. Boyce never taught Special Education. Her dismissive remarks about everybody loving their neighborhood school, aside from being false, are an effort to distract and demeaning to parents.
Removing students from neighborhood schools violates the District's policies that all Special Education students attend neighborhood schools and "full inclusion from Day 1". Did the Board of Education vote to reverse its own policy? Of course teachers were not consulted. Special Education is saying they completely failed at implementing Federal law and district policies.
The Board provided no oversight of Special Education for 4 years. It granted budget increases and blindly told them bring 100% of students into district schools. Programs were "created", some of which were really old programs that already existed, some with name changes, others were "new" and segregated kids into separate classrooms and schools with standards far below A-G.
Special Education claims to have created therapeutic schools and replaced hospital programs because they offer coaching to parents, with mental health "workers" replacing hospitals and doctors. Except not all the "workers" were hired. We've watched 4 years of never-ending Special Education "reorganization" with huge increases in budgets and the number of Special Education employees, but close to zero reporting to the Board and public. Disabled students in PAUSD do not have access to the same education.
Registered user
another community
on Feb 11, 2023 at 12:15 pm
Registered user
on Feb 11, 2023 at 12:15 pm
I read this article substituting "students with moderate to severe disabilities" with "Black students" and "special education" with "Black education". Try it yourself and see if it seems that PAUSD is segregating their schools.
Registered user
Palo Alto Hills
on Feb 11, 2023 at 1:11 pm
Registered user
on Feb 11, 2023 at 1:11 pm
This is a bummer for the current cohort of SPED kids at these schools, but is ultimately a practical and reasonable decision given significant staffing demands and better ability to target grade-level curriculum when K-5 aren't all grouped in a single classroom.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Feb 11, 2023 at 1:36 pm
Registered user
on Feb 11, 2023 at 1:36 pm
Ohlone and Escondido both have special programs that are not duplicated at other elementary campuses, and which disabled students have a right to as much as any other student in the district. Ohlone especially can create positive experiences for special needs students that are not possible on other PAUSD campuses.
The district needs more time to think this out, to get input from parents--it's not just about wanting to remain in the community, although that is a legitimate concern--these students should not be moved until this is much better considered.
Registered user
Triple El
on Feb 12, 2023 at 9:37 pm
Registered user
on Feb 12, 2023 at 9:37 pm
This is how 25 Churchill plays. A lot of noises about ad hoc committees, and openness - when it comes down to it, it's always these crude bureaucratic tactics. And the children always lose. Whenever there's something that might be unpopular, the lower level admins are trotted out. Their mission: protect the leader, Supt. Don. The decision must be presented as "already done", and irreversible. It's telling that the affected groups were sort of, but not really, informed about this. Nowhere in the reporting in this article is there anything about consulting with or working with the interested parties. Parents were out of the loop until this was a fait accompli. Teachers, the actual professionals, were never consulted - just informed after the fact. Is it possible that maybe, just maybe, this administrative team doesn't actually know everything? This style of management - insular, and arrogant - leads to unsound decision-making. Sadly, this is an unsound decision. The children are harmed by this. I fear that all of us who are taxpayers in this district will also pay - in increased litigation costs.
Registered user
another community
on Feb 13, 2023 at 10:43 am
Registered user
on Feb 13, 2023 at 10:43 am
If you expect transparency or honesty from Don Austin or any of his minions at 25 Churchill, then you are living on the wrong planet. Site principals are not assessed on their effectiveness, but rather their loyalty to him. Teachers who question any of this are targeted for harassment, plain and simple.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Feb 13, 2023 at 12:04 pm
Registered user
on Feb 13, 2023 at 12:04 pm
PAUSD Board, with each passing day, our Superintendent demonstrates disregard for democratic process, and a proclivity for treating the most vulnerable in our school community harmfully.
When are you going to act to move our district toward a new admin leader who understands that public schools are for every child? Every child on this planet has different learning needs. Singling out kids with a specific set of special needs and requiring their families to separate siblings and to cart their kids around town to school is burdensome and unfair. Further, it is interesting that only choice schools are the ones that are losing special needs programming. Appalling.
Any Board member who votes for this will lose my vote in the next election. It is shocking that this is being proposed.
Registered user
Crescent Park
on Feb 13, 2023 at 5:14 pm
Registered user
on Feb 13, 2023 at 5:14 pm
It's beyond insulting that Ms. Boyce's comment was, "I'll tell you truth .... had we gone out to those different schools, we would have heard how much every family loves their community." Essentially, we didn't want or take community input, because we already knew that no one wants this plan. And we're going to do what we want to do anyway, so why bother?
It really has me speechless. I guess this is what you get if Austin is your mentor.
Registered user
Charleston Meadows
on Feb 13, 2023 at 7:34 pm
Registered user
on Feb 13, 2023 at 7:34 pm
The thing is, 25 Churchill has done the best, most job-saving thing: they made the decision on their own. The Board is not voting on this (25 Churchill knows that their REAL bosses are the Board - not you). It's on the agenda for tomorrow as an information-only item. Any of you hoping to object somehow should know that the decision has been made, and the Board does not need to make any embarrassing votes. The plan is to wait this out. You as a stakeholder have been effectively cut out of the decision. In fact, all stakeholders have been cut out - even our elected Board!
Registered user
another community
on Feb 14, 2023 at 7:25 am
Registered user
on Feb 14, 2023 at 7:25 am
[Portion removed.]
Stepping out of line for the benefit of students means [teachers] will have a contract out on your head no matter how effective you are in the classroom. Punishments include, but are not limited to reassignments, impossible schedules, "anonymous complaints", and intimidation from site administrators. Most teachers don't want to pay that price, hence dissent is squelched and the Don can impose his will unfettered. Good for him, not so good for your children.
Registered user
Fairmeadow
on Feb 14, 2023 at 11:55 am
Registered user
on Feb 14, 2023 at 11:55 am
Both Don Austin, Amanda Boyce, and the BOE have demonstrated, once again ,that they are not in touch with the community they claim to represent.
Who would ever think making a change like this without the input of the actual teachers and parents was the best way to go about making a decision like this. Do either of them have experience in Special Education?
School board please support us in pausing this change until you have input from those that do - teachers and parents.
Registered user
another community
on Feb 15, 2023 at 7:27 am
Registered user
on Feb 15, 2023 at 7:27 am
Top down Don will simply laugh all of this off since he's safe through 2024. If the current board is anything like the old one, expect the Don to be around for a while. Better fall in line teachers, there's a head count and a hit list.
Registered user
another community
on Feb 15, 2023 at 5:38 pm
Registered user
on Feb 15, 2023 at 5:38 pm
I don't get it. This is a straight up act of discrimination due to disabilities, which violates state and federal laws. It's not up to us as a community to fix this. Unfortunately. The parents of those kids who are being forced to go to school elsewhere are the ones who need to file a complaint with the OCR and CDR (formerly known as DFEH, but changed because they are tasked with ALL discrimination complaints -- not just housing). It can take years to undo the PAUSD process via discrimination lawsuit but it's the only way to reverse this madness permanently. It's not about money, it's about policy. I'm on everybody's iggy list but for dog's sake ...Are there NO attorneys who read this paper who can enlighten us about what remedies are available to cure this nonsense?
Registered user
Crescent Park
on Feb 17, 2023 at 10:08 am
Registered user
on Feb 17, 2023 at 10:08 am
From the article, it seems these families are mostly upset by the poor communication as opposed to the decision itself. I would hope with the class split, this means a better experience for the students and not just a cost cutting exercise. I've never been a big fan of the district having these choice schools (Hoover, Ohlone, Escondido) to start with, but that is different problem. Uprooting students who are likely to be more impacted by relocation and routine change should require more communication. Hard decision or not, changing schools is a massive impact to families: commute, after school care, after school activities, social networks, etc.
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Feb 17, 2023 at 11:11 am
Registered user
on Feb 17, 2023 at 11:11 am
It's odd to me that the board, apparently, doesn't get a decision here. What is the board's function if not this sort of oversight?
Maybe consolidating programs so that there's a K-2 and a Grade 3 - 5 is the right call for these kids. But when the parents *of* the kids are objecting to this change, perhaps we should listen.
Segal and Dharap both made excellent points. These are kids with autism; abrupt changes are very hard on these kids. Why can't we phase in the change? And the district just... didn't talk to parents about this change? What?!
Any business leader knows that communication is key. Making sweeping changes like this without any conversation -- and then saying, "it's for your own good" [even though we didn't talk to you and don't care about your perspective] -- is not going to be healthy for the community.
We need more board members who are willing to object to bad district decisions (or decision making process).
Registered user
Downtown North
on Feb 17, 2023 at 3:58 pm
Registered user
on Feb 17, 2023 at 3:58 pm
If there is a legal issue, it is not the poor treatment of parents by both Special Education and insulting remarks by the Board members at this meeting, but the fact the Board and Special Education stated it knew for 10 years the children in theses K-5 Special Educaiton "Learning Centers" received a bad education, and it did nothing. They could have added an additional classroom at any times.
Special Education mislead the Board by insisting a classroom requires 10 students. Smaller classrooms of 4-8 students can be just as effective, if not more so. Certainly, they provide a better eductaion than K-5 in one room.
If the Board believed for 10 years they offered these disabled children a bad education in a single K-5 classroom, they should have fixed it.
Special Education spent the last 4+ years "re-organizing" under 2 "Co-Directors". The number of employees in the department (Adminstrators, not teachers) has grown immensely. They never tried to fix this?
This is about money and consolidating control. The result it segregating disabled into "Learning Centers" (classrooms) at a few less accessible campuses.
Not sure what is more distateful here: Special Education misleaidng of the Board or their acknowledgement they knew they were hurting disabled children as their salaries and employees grew. But none of that growth went to teaching or students.
Special Education knew they controlled the narrative. By speaking last and answering Board questions, they left the Board with false impressions. Audience members had to shout out corrections when Board Members made many false statements as truth. They are clearly prepared and under the control of Special Education.
Special Education families are accomsted to being treated badly, and internalize it. It is very unusual for parents to organize and speak to the Board. The Board should take notice they need to exercise more control over this department.
Registered user
St. Claire Gardens
on Feb 17, 2023 at 9:44 pm
Registered user
on Feb 17, 2023 at 9:44 pm
This is not the first episode of weak transparency. It's hard to tell whether this move was done at the behest of the Board of Trustees. Presumably, they prefer that hard decisions and unpopular policies be undertaken by 25 Churchill. They're more than happy to pass the buck, wait out the unhappy news coverage and parent comms and then move on. It's hard to know how this sits with the Supt.. He's obsessed with shaping the message and always being the strong decider who is always right. More importantly, is this how we want our democratic institutions to be run? Elected officials not taking responsiblity, a laughable level of transparancy ("we said some things that were not specific at a CAC meeting, and so everyone was informed."). Transparency means talking AND listening. Many of you who are reading this are paying well into the 5 figures for property taxes which fund this institution. Is this how it should be run?
And, the crazy thing is, the policy decision is probably a sound one. Why the vicious power play on the part of 25 Churchill? It seems unnecessarily aggressive. They needlessly burn what little goodwill is left in the community. This could have been a win/win/win, but instead it's another needless demonstration of power - over YOU, children, the Board, teachers, everyone. If no one is accountable, how will this institution operate in a just, equitable fashion? Dark times, indeed.
Registered user
another community
on Apr 23, 2023 at 10:54 pm
Registered user
on Apr 23, 2023 at 10:54 pm
This is happening in Oakland Unified. Our disabled kids are basically getting expelled from their school communities without cause. This does not happen to non-disabled kids. Children should not be torn from their school communities. The CAC at Oakland is having a community meeting about this topic on Monday, April 24. Information on their Facebook page: Web Link