News

Mitchell Park fire station looks to iconic architectural style for inspiration

Designs released for Palo Alto's long-awaited station replacement project modeled after Eichler motif

The proposed design for Fire Station 4 in Palo Alto features Eichler elements such as flat roofs and wooden siding. Rendering courtesy Brown Reynolds Watford Architects.

More than a decade after Palo Alto agreed to replace the aged fire station near Mitchell Park, the project is finally moving ahead.

The city and its consultant, Brown Reynolds Watford Architects, unveiled on Thursday the proposed design for the new Station 4 at a Thursday public hearing in front of the Architectural Review Board.

The designs show that the new station at the corner of Middlefield Road and East Meadow Drive would have glass-paneled doors flanked by wood-tile cladding and plaster siding. A report from the Department of Planning and Community Environment notes that the design is meant to be compatible with surrounding buildings, including single-family homes across the street to the north and east, the Palo Alto Little League ball field to the south and Covenant Presbyterian Church to the west.

The station's floor-to-ceiling glass windows and flat roof lines would be evocative of mid-century modern homes in south Palo Alto, particularly those developed by Joseph Eichler.

The proposed station's angular features are meant to mirror the tower elements of the church and its wood materials are intended to match both the church and the baseball field buildings, the report states.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Once completed, the facility would have larger bays to accommodate modern fire equipment, a landscaped park area and a community room.

The new station would also include a third bay, with no exit to Middlefield, for storage of a reserve vehicle, according to staff.

The project is estimated to cost about $10.2 million, according to the city budget, and is slated to be completed by December 2025.

Constructed in 1953, the Mitchell Park station is one of two that the city has identified as obsolete and ripe for replacement in its 2014 infrastructure work plan. In March 2020, the city completed the reconstruction of Station 3 in Rinconada Park.

The board didn't take any actions on the proposal as part of its "preliminary review," though members were generally pleased with the design. Chair David Hirsch lauded the site plan but urged bolder design elements at the well-traveled corner. Board member Peter Baltay called the plan "excellent proposal" overall, though he and others suggested that the city and its consultants may be going too far in making the building look like the Eichler homes that distinguish the nearby Greenmeadow neighborhood.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Baltay acknowledged: "It's a nod to the Eichler design motif and it's all quite appropriate. That's what Palo Alto is."

At the same time, he said that he is dismayed that the city isn't doing more to distinguish the new building for what it is — a fire station. He suggested that the city and its consultants may be a little too constrained by the "Palo Alto Process" and the need to make everyone happy.

"Right now, it looks like a fancy residence, a little bit larger, on steroids, but boy does it look like an Eichler," Baltay said. "I'd like to think a fire station could look like a fire station, could look like an important civic part of our community. Right now it doesn't. It looks like a house."

Board member Kendra Rosenberg agreed and called the proposed design "an opportunity not taken."

"You can go bigger. You can go bolder. You can go more modern, more stark, more interesting, more architectural. That doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the design as it is. It's a good design. Is it a great design? That's the question."

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

But board member Yingxi Chen argued that the new station's "Eichler feeling" is perfectly appropriate and makes the station feel like it really belongs in the neighborhood. She called it a "successful design," though she suggested additional landscaping around the new station.

The 25-foot-tall building would also include a fitness center, a captain's office, a training room, a kitchen and dining area and five bedrooms for staff.

Palo Alto Fire Department Station 4 by Mitchell Park in Palo Alto on July 23, 2021. Photo by Gennady Sheyner.

The replacement of the fire station has been a city priority for well over a decade. In 2005, a study commissioned by the city found that the station fails to meet California's building code as well as various federal laws, including the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. A 2011 report by a specially appointed infrastructure task force identified the replacement of the station as the city's third-highest priority, behind a new public-safety building and the Rinconada Park fire station.

The new fire station was also included on the City Council's 2014 list of infrastructure priorities, which also included recently completed items such as the bike bridge over the U.S. Highway 101, the Rinconada fire station and the new garage near California Avenue.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important city government news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

Mitchell Park fire station looks to iconic architectural style for inspiration

Designs released for Palo Alto's long-awaited station replacement project modeled after Eichler motif

More than a decade after Palo Alto agreed to replace the aged fire station near Mitchell Park, the project is finally moving ahead.

The city and its consultant, Brown Reynolds Watford Architects, unveiled on Thursday the proposed design for the new Station 4 at a Thursday public hearing in front of the Architectural Review Board.

The designs show that the new station at the corner of Middlefield Road and East Meadow Drive would have glass-paneled doors flanked by wood-tile cladding and plaster siding. A report from the Department of Planning and Community Environment notes that the design is meant to be compatible with surrounding buildings, including single-family homes across the street to the north and east, the Palo Alto Little League ball field to the south and Covenant Presbyterian Church to the west.

The station's floor-to-ceiling glass windows and flat roof lines would be evocative of mid-century modern homes in south Palo Alto, particularly those developed by Joseph Eichler.

The proposed station's angular features are meant to mirror the tower elements of the church and its wood materials are intended to match both the church and the baseball field buildings, the report states.

Once completed, the facility would have larger bays to accommodate modern fire equipment, a landscaped park area and a community room.

The new station would also include a third bay, with no exit to Middlefield, for storage of a reserve vehicle, according to staff.

The project is estimated to cost about $10.2 million, according to the city budget, and is slated to be completed by December 2025.

Constructed in 1953, the Mitchell Park station is one of two that the city has identified as obsolete and ripe for replacement in its 2014 infrastructure work plan. In March 2020, the city completed the reconstruction of Station 3 in Rinconada Park.

The board didn't take any actions on the proposal as part of its "preliminary review," though members were generally pleased with the design. Chair David Hirsch lauded the site plan but urged bolder design elements at the well-traveled corner. Board member Peter Baltay called the plan "excellent proposal" overall, though he and others suggested that the city and its consultants may be going too far in making the building look like the Eichler homes that distinguish the nearby Greenmeadow neighborhood.

Baltay acknowledged: "It's a nod to the Eichler design motif and it's all quite appropriate. That's what Palo Alto is."

At the same time, he said that he is dismayed that the city isn't doing more to distinguish the new building for what it is — a fire station. He suggested that the city and its consultants may be a little too constrained by the "Palo Alto Process" and the need to make everyone happy.

"Right now, it looks like a fancy residence, a little bit larger, on steroids, but boy does it look like an Eichler," Baltay said. "I'd like to think a fire station could look like a fire station, could look like an important civic part of our community. Right now it doesn't. It looks like a house."

Board member Kendra Rosenberg agreed and called the proposed design "an opportunity not taken."

"You can go bigger. You can go bolder. You can go more modern, more stark, more interesting, more architectural. That doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the design as it is. It's a good design. Is it a great design? That's the question."

But board member Yingxi Chen argued that the new station's "Eichler feeling" is perfectly appropriate and makes the station feel like it really belongs in the neighborhood. She called it a "successful design," though she suggested additional landscaping around the new station.

The 25-foot-tall building would also include a fitness center, a captain's office, a training room, a kitchen and dining area and five bedrooms for staff.

The replacement of the fire station has been a city priority for well over a decade. In 2005, a study commissioned by the city found that the station fails to meet California's building code as well as various federal laws, including the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. A 2011 report by a specially appointed infrastructure task force identified the replacement of the station as the city's third-highest priority, behind a new public-safety building and the Rinconada Park fire station.

The new fire station was also included on the City Council's 2014 list of infrastructure priorities, which also included recently completed items such as the bike bridge over the U.S. Highway 101, the Rinconada fire station and the new garage near California Avenue.

Comments

Walter Underwood
Registered user
Greendell/Walnut Grove
on Feb 20, 2023 at 9:30 am
Walter Underwood, Greendell/Walnut Grove
Registered user
on Feb 20, 2023 at 9:30 am

That is a lot of glass for a building that must be useful after an earthquake. What happens when those clerestory windows come crashing down into the bay with the fire engines?


Anonymous
Registered user
Duveneck/St. Francis
on Feb 21, 2023 at 12:53 pm
Anonymous, Duveneck/St. Francis
Registered user
on Feb 21, 2023 at 12:53 pm

I very much like that the design looks like an Eichler. However, I agree it must stay intact in case of a big earthquake!


marc665
Registered user
Midtown
on Feb 21, 2023 at 2:53 pm
marc665, Midtown
Registered user
on Feb 21, 2023 at 2:53 pm

In the 30 years we've lived here, Palo Alto has never completed any project on time, on budget.
The new bike bridge, Rinconada Fire Station, California Ave "improvements", Mitchell Park Library, and on and on

Instead of worrying about building some "iconic" stucture, how about a normal building that is done, on time, on budget?

/marc


larryncelia
Registered user
Palo Verde
on Feb 21, 2023 at 7:22 pm
larryncelia, Palo Verde
Registered user
on Feb 21, 2023 at 7:22 pm

Was it Mr Baltay or the reporter who compared this design to Eichlers all the way over in Greenmeadow? There are many closer Eichler, including several just across the street on Middlefield, and of course the best Eichler neighborhood of them all, Los Arboles just a block down. I might be biased.


Local Resident
Registered user
Community Center
on Feb 22, 2023 at 1:47 pm
Local Resident, Community Center
Registered user
on Feb 22, 2023 at 1:47 pm

This project is specifically funded to make this fire station earthquake resistant. The current fire stations doors may not be able to open after a major earthquake. The San Andreas fault (6 miles from the firestation) can have up to a 8.0 magnitude. That’s what local critical infrastructure should be designed to withstand like the new Stanford hospital was. It does not appear that earthquake resistance was the architects primary design goal. Please ensure the design can withstand an 8.0 magnitude earthquake.


Resident11
Registered user
Fairmeadow
on Feb 22, 2023 at 5:57 pm
Resident11, Fairmeadow
Registered user
on Feb 22, 2023 at 5:57 pm

I agree that it looks too much like a residence and not enough like a fire station. I also agree that it should be robust. Hopefully there will be a Round 2 of design.


Consider Your Options.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 17, 2023 at 1:00 pm
Consider Your Options. , Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Mar 17, 2023 at 1:00 pm

Please prioritize emergency preparedness for a worst-case scenario in planning this building. We appreciate efforts to create an attractive building that conforms with nearby architecture on this very visible corner lot, but let's not let that delay progress. It is time to get this project moving. Reliable emergency services are very important. The city has been adding hundreds of housing units in this area and plans to add thousands more with the draft Housing Element. The existing station is insufficient to house modern emergency and fire equipment that's needed to serve the taller, denser development.

Also, Cubberley is a seriously hot mess after 40 years of neglect--I'd describe it as blighted. We need a functional community center with adequate capacity to serve thousands of new residents, too.

Mr. Shikada, Mr. Lait and Ms. O'Kane, City Council, What is the plan for community services and transportation facilities for the lion's share of the state mandated new housing that the city plans to rezone for on San Antonio and Fabian and throughout south PA? We have been through planning processes in 2012 and 2019 for Cubberley and nothing has been done, even on the city's portion of the property to create functional space for community services we need there. The gym is now closed due to water intrusion. At minimum, if you are not going to redevelop this space, at least maintain it to keep it functional for community services. I don't think it has been painted in twenty or more years. Interior landscapes increasingly are littered with heaving asphalt, tree stumps and portable and prefab buildings and sheds that replace formerly functional rooms. When is something going to be done? Council members, if you haven't looked at it lately, please take a walking tour of Cubberley. Please note the mold, rust, peeling paint, dry rot, unfilled cracks, ubiquitous rat traps. This is not okay.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.