News

Condominium development proposed in Ventura neighborhood

Project includes four buildings with 16 townhomes

The proposed development at 420 Acadia Ave. in Palo Alto would consist of four buildings containing 16 townhomes. Rendering courtesy Dahlin Group.

A vacant lot in the Ventura neighborhood may soon be transformed into a condominium community with 16 townhomes through an application now under the city's review.

The development calls for 16 townhomes arranged in four buildings at 420 Acacia Ave., near El Camino Real. The site is now a parking lot with 68 spaces near the former Hammer Auto Brokers building and across Acacia from the Equinox Palo Alto gym.

Two buildings would be located at the rear of the property, close to an existing single-family home and would be two stories tall. The other two, at the front of the property, would be three stories tall with a fourth-floor roof deck, the plans show.

The townhomes would range from two- to four-bedroom units, each of which will have a two-car garage. The two-story units would also have private side yards.

The Morgan Hill-based developer Dividend Homes is relying on Senate Bill 330, which is legislation that bars the city from revising design standards for new projects. By filing an SB 330 pre-application, the developer is ensuring that the city will only rely on measurable "objective" criteria in reviewing the project and that the review process will be limited to no more than five public hearings.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Because the site is already zoned for multifamily residential use that allows up to 30 dwellings per acre, the developer will not require any zone changes to get the project approved. In the project description, Dividend notes that the variety of unit types in the new development will allow it to "cater to a larger range of population." Two of the 16 townhomes would be designated as affordable units, making the project eligible for waivers and concessions under state law.

"The on-site inclusionary units along with the variety in unit types makes this a mixed-income missing middle housing that would be a wonderful addition to the housing fabric in the city of Palo Alto," the project description states.

The 16-townhome project proposed for 420 Acacia Ave. in Palo Alto would be built on the site of a parking lot. Courtesy Dahlin.

Bryan Wenter, writing on behalf of Dividend, also noted in a letter that the state Housing Accountability Act guarantees the project can be built essentially as proposed and limits the city's ability to demand fewer units.

"Accordingly, if a project complies with applicable, objective general plan, zoning, subdivision and design standards in the eyes of a reasonable person, the project cannot be disapproved or conditioned on a lower density unless, based on a preponderance of the evidence in the record, it would have a 'specific, adverse impact' upon public health or safety and there is no feasible way to mitigate that impact," Wenter wrote in a March 3 letter. "If a city's disapproval or conditional approval is challenged in court, the burden is on the City to prove its decision conformed to all the conditions specified in the HAA."

If it advances, the Acacia Avenue development will be just the latest in a wave of new housing proposals in Ventura, a historically underserved and centrally located neighborhood south of the California Avenue business district. The city recently celebrated the grand opening of Wilton Court, a housing complex for low-income residents and individuals for disabilities. City planners are also now reviewing a proposal for a 129-apartment complex pitched by Charities Housing, a nonprofit developer, for the former site of Mike's Bikes at 3001 El Camino Real.

The most ambitious project, however, is the city's proposed redevelopment of the former Fry's site at 340 Portage Ave. The current plan, which the council negotiated with the property owner, The Sobrato Organization, calls for Sobrato to build 74 townhomes along Park Boulevard and to donate land to the city for a future affordable-housing development.

A look at housing projects proposed (purple icons), under construction (green icons) and inactive (yellow icons) as of March 21, 2023. Map by Jamey Padojino.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important city government news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

Condominium development proposed in Ventura neighborhood

Project includes four buildings with 16 townhomes

A vacant lot in the Ventura neighborhood may soon be transformed into a condominium community with 16 townhomes through an application now under the city's review.

The development calls for 16 townhomes arranged in four buildings at 420 Acacia Ave., near El Camino Real. The site is now a parking lot with 68 spaces near the former Hammer Auto Brokers building and across Acacia from the Equinox Palo Alto gym.

Two buildings would be located at the rear of the property, close to an existing single-family home and would be two stories tall. The other two, at the front of the property, would be three stories tall with a fourth-floor roof deck, the plans show.

The townhomes would range from two- to four-bedroom units, each of which will have a two-car garage. The two-story units would also have private side yards.

The Morgan Hill-based developer Dividend Homes is relying on Senate Bill 330, which is legislation that bars the city from revising design standards for new projects. By filing an SB 330 pre-application, the developer is ensuring that the city will only rely on measurable "objective" criteria in reviewing the project and that the review process will be limited to no more than five public hearings.

Because the site is already zoned for multifamily residential use that allows up to 30 dwellings per acre, the developer will not require any zone changes to get the project approved. In the project description, Dividend notes that the variety of unit types in the new development will allow it to "cater to a larger range of population." Two of the 16 townhomes would be designated as affordable units, making the project eligible for waivers and concessions under state law.

"The on-site inclusionary units along with the variety in unit types makes this a mixed-income missing middle housing that would be a wonderful addition to the housing fabric in the city of Palo Alto," the project description states.

Bryan Wenter, writing on behalf of Dividend, also noted in a letter that the state Housing Accountability Act guarantees the project can be built essentially as proposed and limits the city's ability to demand fewer units.

"Accordingly, if a project complies with applicable, objective general plan, zoning, subdivision and design standards in the eyes of a reasonable person, the project cannot be disapproved or conditioned on a lower density unless, based on a preponderance of the evidence in the record, it would have a 'specific, adverse impact' upon public health or safety and there is no feasible way to mitigate that impact," Wenter wrote in a March 3 letter. "If a city's disapproval or conditional approval is challenged in court, the burden is on the City to prove its decision conformed to all the conditions specified in the HAA."

If it advances, the Acacia Avenue development will be just the latest in a wave of new housing proposals in Ventura, a historically underserved and centrally located neighborhood south of the California Avenue business district. The city recently celebrated the grand opening of Wilton Court, a housing complex for low-income residents and individuals for disabilities. City planners are also now reviewing a proposal for a 129-apartment complex pitched by Charities Housing, a nonprofit developer, for the former site of Mike's Bikes at 3001 El Camino Real.

The most ambitious project, however, is the city's proposed redevelopment of the former Fry's site at 340 Portage Ave. The current plan, which the council negotiated with the property owner, The Sobrato Organization, calls for Sobrato to build 74 townhomes along Park Boulevard and to donate land to the city for a future affordable-housing development.

Comments

Mondoman
Registered user
Green Acres
on Mar 21, 2023 at 10:34 am
Mondoman, Green Acres
Registered user
on Mar 21, 2023 at 10:34 am

Re: "Ventura, a historically underserved and centrally located neighborhood..."

What exactly IS a "historically underserved" neighborhood?


Consider Your Options.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 21, 2023 at 2:59 pm
Consider Your Options. , Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Mar 21, 2023 at 2:59 pm

The street level facade is cold and completely unwelcoming. So much for pedestrian-friendly design principles from the Comp Plan. It looks like a prison from the sidewalk level or tenement housing. One narrow door, windows above pedestrian height, no awnings or landscaping to provide comfort/shade, no effort to activate pedestrian space. And seriously ugly. What's the setback? Is there sufficient room to create an active street level environment? Could not have made it more unwelcoming if you tried. Bleak.


stephen levy
Registered user
University South
on Mar 21, 2023 at 4:59 pm
stephen levy, University South
Registered user
on Mar 21, 2023 at 4:59 pm

Gennady,
My understanding from staff is that this property was sold by Charities Housing to raise funds for the adjacent large BMR project you refer to in your article.
The two projects are linked in that way.
Steve


tmp
Registered user
Downtown North
on Mar 21, 2023 at 6:06 pm
tmp, Downtown North
Registered user
on Mar 21, 2023 at 6:06 pm

Another large, miserable looking monstrosity to add to over-population and diminish quality of life. Mindless destruction of a community one ugly high rise at a time.

Sure hope some group will get a referendum on the ballot to allow local communities to take back local zoning from the state politicians who have handed it off to their deep pocketed developer buddies.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.