News

How a condo project is helping to finance Palo Alto's largest affordable-housing development

Charities Housing sold land to fund 129-apartment complex at former site of Mike's Bikes

The proposed development at 3001 El Camino Real, shown here from the northwest corner, would include 129 apartments. Courtesy David Baker Architects/City of Palo Alto.

At first blush, the 16 condominium development proposed for 420 Acacia Ave. in Palo Alto seems like a relatively minor addition to the Ventura neighborhood.

The plan by Dividend Homes for what's currently a 0.8-acre parking lot would include four buildings: three along Acacia and a smaller fourth building set back from the street.

Located a short stroll from the former Fry's Electronics building, the proposal comes at a time of great change for the Ventura neighborhood, with The Sobrato Organization planning to construct 74 townhomes to replace a portion of the historic cannery building. As part of the same deal, the city is envisioning putting an affordable-housing project with more than 70 apartments elsewhere on the former Fry's site, as well as a park.

Dividend Homes' biggest contribution to Ventura, then, may not be these 16 residences but the ones that could go up on the lot next door. Dividend Homes bought its property from the nonprofit developer Charities Housing, helping the nonprofit to finance the largest affordable housing project in Palo Alto's recent history: a 129-apartment complex at 3001 El Camino Real, which is next to 420 Acacia.

Located on the former site of Mike's Bikes, the Charities Housing project is steadily progressing through the city's approval process. While the nonprofit is still working to line up the necessary funding, it is hoping to start construction in 2025, Executive Director Mark Mikl told this publication.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

As the names of the two developers imply, the housing projects have conspicuously different objectives. The Dividend development is a profit-focused project with dwellings that will likely cater to well-to-do buyers, while the Charities one is looking to serve residents who make between 30% and 50% of area median income.

The Charities project isn't the first to target the former Mike's Bikes site. In 2017, Sobrato submitted an application to construct 50 apartments and 2,000-square-feet of retail there. The developer later withdrew that plan and sold the land to Charities. Charities, in turn, then sold an 0.8-acre portion of the L-shaped parcel to Dividend, leaving the remaining rectangle of land for its own affordable-housing project.

According to records from the Santa Clara County Assessor's Office, the land has an assessed value of $6.8 million.

"We just sold them the parcel and it's allowing us to have a more efficient and effective development parcel and it lowers the land cost per unit," Mikl said.

Using market-rate development to fund affordable housing

The idea of leveraging market-rate housing to help pay for below-market-rate residences isn't new. A decade ago, the nonprofit Palo Alto Housing Corporation sought to build 60 apartments for low-income seniors and 12 single-family homes on Maybell Avenue, replacing four houses and an orchard. While the City Council approved a zone change to enable the project, residents overturned the decision in a 2013 referendum.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

The developer, now known as Alta Housing, maintained at the time that the single-family homes were needed to help pay for the senior housing. Project opponents, for their part, complained about the size and density of the project, its potential to worsen traffic conditions along a school-commute corridor and the inclusion of the single-family homes in the development, which differentiated the project from most other affordable-housing proposals.

The fact that Charities hasn't encountered this type of opposition reflects a recent shift in Palo Alto's development climate. Facing a state mandate to add more than 6,000 housing units between 2023 and 2031, the city is revising its zoning laws to permit taller and denser multi-family buildings and finalizing a plan for a 60-acre portion of Ventura that includes the Fry's site and the Charities and Dividend projects. A key goal of the plan is to bring more affordable housing — along with retail, a park and other amenities — to the area.

Mikl said Charities has been encouraged by recent city actions, including a tax measure that the voters approved last fall. Under an agreement that the council struck with business groups, a third of the proceeds from the new business tax would be devoted to supporting affordable housing. And the city proved receptive to the Charities proposal, Mikl said.

"From the real estate development perspective, they felt this was worth us spending our time and effort to advance a project like that, in this location and this city," Mikl said.

Some see the Charities project as an important component of a growing affordable-housing ecosystem, which also includes a transitional-housing development that Palo Alto and the nonprofit LifeMoves are preparing to construct at 1237 San Antonio Road, east of U.S. Highway 101.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

When Alta Housing was hosting a grand opening ceremony last December for its own affordable housing development on El Camino, Wilton Court, Council member Pat Burt alluded to the city's pipeline of affordable housing projects, including the Charities project and the Eden Housing development at 525 Charleston Road.

Burt said the recent applications represent the largest spurt in affordable housing that the city has seen in more than 30 years. What's more, the Charities development would allocate units for residents with "very low" and "extremely low" incomes, potentially taking tenants of the LifeMoves transitional housing project and giving them permanent housing.

"These are a lot of our most vital workers in our community, as well as other people who have … this fundamental need of housing," Burt said.

The plan for Charities' housing

By Palo Alto's notoriously fastidious standards, Charities' progress through the review process has been relatively breezy. The nonprofit filed its application last year and, after some revisions, received the approval from the city's Architectural Review Board in May. It then received an approval letter from the city's Planning and Development Services Department in June.

According to the revised application that Charities submitted last spring, the development would be five-stories tall and include a mix of studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments. The current plan calls for 24 studios, 40 one-bedroom apartments, 27 two-bedroom apartments and 38 three-bedroom apartments, though Charities has indicated that the mix may vary slightly as the design progresses.

The development will also include amenities such as a large community room with a kitchen; a pantry that Charities will create in partnership with organizations such as the Second Harvest Food Bank; offices for social-service providers and bike storage.

Most of the building would be 60-feet tall, though a stair feature at the end of the building would bring that portion up to 66 feet. Though Palo Alto still has a 50-foot height limit for new developments, that restriction has become largely irrelevant for affordable-housing projects.

Under the state's "density bonus" law, which provides various zoning exemptions to housing projects with below-market-rate components, the Charities project is eligible for up to 83 feet of height (or 68 feet in the portion next to single-family homes).

The developer is seeking to minimize the project's impact on the adjacent single-family homes on Olive Avenue, just north of the site, by breaking up the massing along El Camino on the northern portion of the site closest to Olive. Under the revised application, the portion of the building facing Olive features a podium design and a "pedestrian-scale environment" with porches and pedestrian mews.

If all goes well, Mikl said, the project could welcome its first residents in 2027.

"There's a lot of public and private parties that need to come together to bring the deal together, but there's a lot of interest in it," Mikl said.

Bryan Wenter, whose firm is representing Dividend Homes, noted in a letter to the city in March that the proposal qualifies for expedited review under Senate Bill 330, which limits the number of public hearings on a proposed development and which bans cities from changing development rules for a project once an application is submitted.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important city government news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

How a condo project is helping to finance Palo Alto's largest affordable-housing development

Charities Housing sold land to fund 129-apartment complex at former site of Mike's Bikes

At first blush, the 16 condominium development proposed for 420 Acacia Ave. in Palo Alto seems like a relatively minor addition to the Ventura neighborhood.

The plan by Dividend Homes for what's currently a 0.8-acre parking lot would include four buildings: three along Acacia and a smaller fourth building set back from the street.

Located a short stroll from the former Fry's Electronics building, the proposal comes at a time of great change for the Ventura neighborhood, with The Sobrato Organization planning to construct 74 townhomes to replace a portion of the historic cannery building. As part of the same deal, the city is envisioning putting an affordable-housing project with more than 70 apartments elsewhere on the former Fry's site, as well as a park.

Dividend Homes' biggest contribution to Ventura, then, may not be these 16 residences but the ones that could go up on the lot next door. Dividend Homes bought its property from the nonprofit developer Charities Housing, helping the nonprofit to finance the largest affordable housing project in Palo Alto's recent history: a 129-apartment complex at 3001 El Camino Real, which is next to 420 Acacia.

Located on the former site of Mike's Bikes, the Charities Housing project is steadily progressing through the city's approval process. While the nonprofit is still working to line up the necessary funding, it is hoping to start construction in 2025, Executive Director Mark Mikl told this publication.

As the names of the two developers imply, the housing projects have conspicuously different objectives. The Dividend development is a profit-focused project with dwellings that will likely cater to well-to-do buyers, while the Charities one is looking to serve residents who make between 30% and 50% of area median income.

The Charities project isn't the first to target the former Mike's Bikes site. In 2017, Sobrato submitted an application to construct 50 apartments and 2,000-square-feet of retail there. The developer later withdrew that plan and sold the land to Charities. Charities, in turn, then sold an 0.8-acre portion of the L-shaped parcel to Dividend, leaving the remaining rectangle of land for its own affordable-housing project.

According to records from the Santa Clara County Assessor's Office, the land has an assessed value of $6.8 million.

"We just sold them the parcel and it's allowing us to have a more efficient and effective development parcel and it lowers the land cost per unit," Mikl said.

Using market-rate development to fund affordable housing

The idea of leveraging market-rate housing to help pay for below-market-rate residences isn't new. A decade ago, the nonprofit Palo Alto Housing Corporation sought to build 60 apartments for low-income seniors and 12 single-family homes on Maybell Avenue, replacing four houses and an orchard. While the City Council approved a zone change to enable the project, residents overturned the decision in a 2013 referendum.

The developer, now known as Alta Housing, maintained at the time that the single-family homes were needed to help pay for the senior housing. Project opponents, for their part, complained about the size and density of the project, its potential to worsen traffic conditions along a school-commute corridor and the inclusion of the single-family homes in the development, which differentiated the project from most other affordable-housing proposals.

The fact that Charities hasn't encountered this type of opposition reflects a recent shift in Palo Alto's development climate. Facing a state mandate to add more than 6,000 housing units between 2023 and 2031, the city is revising its zoning laws to permit taller and denser multi-family buildings and finalizing a plan for a 60-acre portion of Ventura that includes the Fry's site and the Charities and Dividend projects. A key goal of the plan is to bring more affordable housing — along with retail, a park and other amenities — to the area.

Mikl said Charities has been encouraged by recent city actions, including a tax measure that the voters approved last fall. Under an agreement that the council struck with business groups, a third of the proceeds from the new business tax would be devoted to supporting affordable housing. And the city proved receptive to the Charities proposal, Mikl said.

"From the real estate development perspective, they felt this was worth us spending our time and effort to advance a project like that, in this location and this city," Mikl said.

Some see the Charities project as an important component of a growing affordable-housing ecosystem, which also includes a transitional-housing development that Palo Alto and the nonprofit LifeMoves are preparing to construct at 1237 San Antonio Road, east of U.S. Highway 101.

When Alta Housing was hosting a grand opening ceremony last December for its own affordable housing development on El Camino, Wilton Court, Council member Pat Burt alluded to the city's pipeline of affordable housing projects, including the Charities project and the Eden Housing development at 525 Charleston Road.

Burt said the recent applications represent the largest spurt in affordable housing that the city has seen in more than 30 years. What's more, the Charities development would allocate units for residents with "very low" and "extremely low" incomes, potentially taking tenants of the LifeMoves transitional housing project and giving them permanent housing.

"These are a lot of our most vital workers in our community, as well as other people who have … this fundamental need of housing," Burt said.

The plan for Charities' housing

By Palo Alto's notoriously fastidious standards, Charities' progress through the review process has been relatively breezy. The nonprofit filed its application last year and, after some revisions, received the approval from the city's Architectural Review Board in May. It then received an approval letter from the city's Planning and Development Services Department in June.

According to the revised application that Charities submitted last spring, the development would be five-stories tall and include a mix of studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments. The current plan calls for 24 studios, 40 one-bedroom apartments, 27 two-bedroom apartments and 38 three-bedroom apartments, though Charities has indicated that the mix may vary slightly as the design progresses.

The development will also include amenities such as a large community room with a kitchen; a pantry that Charities will create in partnership with organizations such as the Second Harvest Food Bank; offices for social-service providers and bike storage.

Most of the building would be 60-feet tall, though a stair feature at the end of the building would bring that portion up to 66 feet. Though Palo Alto still has a 50-foot height limit for new developments, that restriction has become largely irrelevant for affordable-housing projects.

Under the state's "density bonus" law, which provides various zoning exemptions to housing projects with below-market-rate components, the Charities project is eligible for up to 83 feet of height (or 68 feet in the portion next to single-family homes).

The developer is seeking to minimize the project's impact on the adjacent single-family homes on Olive Avenue, just north of the site, by breaking up the massing along El Camino on the northern portion of the site closest to Olive. Under the revised application, the portion of the building facing Olive features a podium design and a "pedestrian-scale environment" with porches and pedestrian mews.

If all goes well, Mikl said, the project could welcome its first residents in 2027.

"There's a lot of public and private parties that need to come together to bring the deal together, but there's a lot of interest in it," Mikl said.

Bryan Wenter, whose firm is representing Dividend Homes, noted in a letter to the city in March that the proposal qualifies for expedited review under Senate Bill 330, which limits the number of public hearings on a proposed development and which bans cities from changing development rules for a project once an application is submitted.

Comments

Dave
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Aug 1, 2023 at 8:06 am
Dave, Old Palo Alto
Registered user
on Aug 1, 2023 at 8:06 am

On the one hand, these properties have been junky for over 50 years. But on the other hand, it’s sad to see PA continue to build more soul-less high rise condos.


Silver Linings
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 1, 2023 at 12:16 pm
Silver Linings, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Aug 1, 2023 at 12:16 pm

This perennial mischaracterization of the Maybell referendum to suit an agenda gets tiresome. PAHC was NOT going to build the 12-15 houses on the majority of the property, nor was the affordable housing going to benefit from the home sale profits of any single-family homes. In fact, neighbors asked if that could be done to provide the funding for a better project, and were rebuffed—by PAHC.

The profits at Maybell were going to come from selling grossly upzoned land to a for-profit developer, so they could put up tall 3-story houses on 2,000 sq ft lots, on a substandard road, incidentally nearby a school program for disabled children who could never even stay in such homes. The profits from selling these homes was NOT going to the affordable housing, only the sale of the upzoned lot, i.e., the profit wasn’t from selling land or houses as in this article, but in selling the neighborhood’s ZONING.

The neighbors, per an internal survey, always welcomed a development on that lot that was ONLY affordable housing.* Or, subdividing and upgrading the existing 4 homes and selling them at a profit that would have exceeded the lot sale to help fund the affordable housing. PAHC at the time wouldn't consider the latter or anything else that neighbors would have compromised on.

The inflexibility of PAHC and constant mischaracterization of neighbors during that debate led to a schism that made collaboration impossible. It got people afraid of a movement against affordable housing that just wasn’t real. What ’s described in this article is different, no one is trying to sell upzoning on substandard streets, with zero awareness of safety or context, like at Maybell.

*In fact, the very same neighbors were why, 20 years prior, Terman school wasn't turned into a for-profit development but instead the school was saved and an affordable development next to the school was built.


Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
Registered user
Adobe-Meadow
on Aug 1, 2023 at 1:49 pm
Resident 1-Adobe Meadows, Adobe-Meadow
Registered user
on Aug 1, 2023 at 1:49 pm

I think this all sounds great. WE are in the cross hairs of out-of-state developers who are waiting for the go ahead to pounce on us with all type of projects that we have no control over. At least here we have recognizable, local companies that need projects to stay in business. It is concerning that so many twists and turns have taken place when if everyone on board this all could have happened much earlier.
ECR is suppose to be where large building are placed - it is a major commute route for business and sports events. Help facilitate this effort and move it forward. WE need to show forward momentum on projects by local builders.


Amie
Registered user
Downtown North
on Aug 1, 2023 at 6:17 pm
Amie, Downtown North
Registered user
on Aug 1, 2023 at 6:17 pm

Using market-rate development to fund affordable housing - and quick action by the city under SB 330! This is how we get housing built, creative solutions like this are the key. I am excited to see such a beautiful project on this stretch of ECR. Well done to everyone involved.


MyFeelz
Registered user
another community
on Aug 1, 2023 at 7:18 pm
MyFeelz, another community
Registered user
on Aug 1, 2023 at 7:18 pm

People just don't get it. "Affordable housing" is just a code word. The only beneficiaries are the developers, and the architects; both of which can "sell" their tax credits to improve on cronyism. The "affordable housing" buildngs that are developed under LIHTC are discussed at the California Treasury's website here Web Link The rents may be "affordable" when they initially lease-up, but increases are limitless for the first 10 years of occupancy. "Per Section 3 1947.12(d)(1) of the legislation, the Tenant Protection Act does not apply to “Housing restricted by deed, regulatory restriction contained in an agreement with a government agency, or other recorded document as affordable housing for persons and families of very low, low, or moderate income ... or subject to an agreement that provides housing subsidies for affordable housing for persons and families of very low, low, or moderate income....”Since the LIHTC program is a federal regulatory restriction, with a recorded Regulatory Agreement, by a government agency (CTCAC) for affordable housing for households that are considered low or very low income (50%-60% AMI), the protections under AB 1482 do not apply."

You can call it low income housing, or workforce housing, or granny flats, ADU's or anything you want. But if it's built under CTCAC rules, it's kind of like people who work a cheat system at a poker game, passing cards under the table. Here is a good description of the scheme, as described by the Tax Policy Center: "The federal government issues tax credits to state and territorial governments. State housing agencies then award the credits to private developers of affordable rental housing projects through a competitive process. Developers generally sell the credits to private investors to obtain funding."

Does anybody really believe these lego's are built to help the poor? They aren't. If the AMI goes up, the rent goes up without restriction.


Mondoman
Registered user
Green Acres
on Aug 5, 2023 at 9:51 pm
Mondoman, Green Acres
Registered user
on Aug 5, 2023 at 9:51 pm

@Silver Linings

Re: " very same neighbors were why, 20 years prior, Terman school wasn't turned into a for-profit development"

Terman Park is now on the way to being bulldozed and turned into a development. The City and School District are discussing stripping park status from Terman Park and turning it over to the school district. Since the district *already* has full access to the park for students etc, the only reason for "deparking" and transferring is presumably so it can be bulldozed for development.

Write the City Council and School District - save Terman Park!


Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
Registered user
Adobe-Meadow
on Aug 6, 2023 at 7:00 pm
Resident 1-Adobe Meadows, Adobe-Meadow
Registered user
on Aug 6, 2023 at 7:00 pm

The City of Santa Clara has big issues - Luckily the appearance of big shows at the stadium help fund other city opportunities. Lots of congrats of the public transit that moved many people to the event from their hotels. Their Community Center is a closed high school that now has the Heritage Theatre and a private charter school, and the vast athletic fields for everyone' use.

SU/Palo Alto has a huge sports stadium and TV coverage for the teams that play there - including basketball and tennis. PAHS and Gunn are in the news with all of their great sports teams. The SU hospital, including the Packard Children's hospital, as well as the Sutter Health anchor world wide attention for people coming here for the best in medical care.

At a lunch the other day a big conversation concerning the price of housing and a Los Altos person was looking for PA to solve problems. WE are a target since we have Caltrain. But Caltrain does not stop except at two locations in PA. What we need is a dedicated bus line on ECR to service all of the great institutions that are on that street. Other cities are benefiting from public transit. This set of projects will benefit from public transit.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.