As Palo Alto gets ready to rule on a contentious housing project at the Ventura site formerly occupied by Fry's Electronics, city leaders are also preparing to consider a very different residential proposal about a block from that site.
The City Council will get its first look on Sept. 11 at a plan by the developer Half Dome Capital to construct 44 apartments for Palo Alto educators at 3265 El Camino Real, a commercial site that was most recently occupied by a Travelodge motel swimming pool. The five-story building would include 24 studios, 20 one-bedroom apartments and a rooftop deck for residents, according to project plans.
The Half Dome proposal isn't the first attempt to redevelop the site. In 2019, the city had approved a proposal from the Denardi Group to construct a mixed-use three-story building with commercial space and three residential units. The project, however, never advanced and the approval has since expired, according to a new report from the Department of Planning and Development Services.
Jason Matlof, managing director at Half Dome, told this publication in an April interview that his own experiences inspired him to pursue a teacher housing project. He has three children who went through Palo Alto schools and he recognized that the vast majority of local teachers cannot afford to live here. Some commute from as far away as Tracy and Modesto.
Matlof said he hopes the project could serve as a precedent for other developers to provide housing for critical workers without city subsidies.
"I'm hoping this will find a healthy balance between doing well and doing good," Matlof said.
Prior to submitting the application in April, his firm had formed a partnership with the local teachers union, the Palo Alto Educators Association, to pursue the project, which would require numerous zoning concessions from the city. These include a height exemption to allow the building to be 59 feet tall, an increase in allowed building density, and an exemption from the city's requirement for ground-floor retail space.
But unlike other recent applications, Half Dome is looking to work within the city's regulatory framework rather than rely on state laws to override local concerns. The proposal is a "planned home zoning" application, which involves reviews by the city's various land use boards and which gives the council wide latitude to request revisions or deny the project.
The El Camino site also lies about a block from the Portage Avenue cannery building that until 2019 housed Fry's Electronics and that is now eyed for a 74-townhome development. There are, however, key differences between the two projects. The Portage project is part of a broader development agreement that, among other things, allows The Sobrato Organization to retain commercial use of the building, which is zoned for multi-family housing. The Half Dome project, by contrast, would take a site that is currently zoned for commercial use and convert it to residential use.
The application from Half Dome makes the case that the site's location at El Camino – and its relative proximity to California Avenue – makes it ideal for its new proposed purpose.
"This project would provide a quality infill development on an empty and underutilized site, which is located on a major arterial street, El Camino Real, with close proximity to restaurants, shops, and transit located along both California Avenue and El Camino Real," the project architect, Isaiah Stackhouse of the firm Trachtenberg Architects, wrote to the city in a project description. "It would also contribute much needed new housing to the city's stock."
The report from city planners also highlights the fact that unlike other residential proposals in the area, the Half Dome plan is not invoking "builder's remedy," a legally untested state provision that allows developers to override local zoning regulations in municipalities that don't have an approved plan for constructing more housing. Palo Alto's recent influx of builder's remedy applications include a 185-apartment complex at the Creekside Inn site at 3400 El Camino Real and a 380-apartment complex pitched for 3150 El Camino Real, site of The Fish Market.
"This project is seeking a PHZ approval at a time when other projects with lesser affordability have asserted that the ‘builder's remedy,' under the Housing Accountability Act obviates the need for such rezoning," the report from the planning department states. "While there are unresolved legal questions surrounding the applicability of the ‘builder's remedy' following the City‘s adoption of a Housing Element on May 8, 2023, the applicant‘s decision to utilize the City‘s PHZ process is notable."
The Sept. 11 pre-screening hearing will give the council a chance to offer early feedback on the project, allowing the developer to determine whether to file a formal application. If Half Dome proceeds, its development would be the second teacher-focused housing project to advance in the California Avenue area.
Last month, city and Santa Clara County officials celebrated a groundbreaking development plan for 231 Grant Ave., spearheaded by Mercy Housing California (MHC) and Abode Communities, that would create 110 apartments for teachers and other school employees from participating districts.
Comments
Registered user
Green Acres
on Sep 11, 2023 at 9:01 am
Registered user
on Sep 11, 2023 at 9:01 am
How many parking spaces on site?
Registered user
Community Center
on Sep 11, 2023 at 9:05 am
Registered user
on Sep 11, 2023 at 9:05 am
I like the concept. However, where the rubber meets the road is affordability. Would these be market rate, workforce or below market housing? What would the average rent and rent per square foot be?
Registered user
College Terrace
on Sep 11, 2023 at 9:13 am
Registered user
on Sep 11, 2023 at 9:13 am
I hope that only Palo Alto teachers will be able to rent these units. It looks like a good area for housing.
Registered user
Downtown North
on Sep 11, 2023 at 11:49 am
Registered user
on Sep 11, 2023 at 11:49 am
A great project in a great location with ZERO public funding that will support local retail, services, and (obviously) our schools. I am so excited to see this project move forward.
The city's recently adopted Economic Development Strategy calls for projects just like this - more housing near retail. Being less than 0.5 mile from transit and is adjacent to numerous safe routes to school, it is a dream location in terms of quality of life and connection to community.
Let's get this one approved and built ASAP!
Registered user
University South
on Sep 11, 2023 at 12:56 pm
Registered user
on Sep 11, 2023 at 12:56 pm
Agree with Amie and both teachers, students and their parents benefit when teachers do not have to do long commutes and have more time to be there for students.
And the idea is to focus on Palo Alto teachers and, possibly staff.
Registered user
Green Acres
on Sep 11, 2023 at 1:53 pm
Registered user
on Sep 11, 2023 at 1:53 pm
Council packet says 22 garage parking spaces in stackers for 44 units. I hope half the teachers can get by without cars!
Registered user
Palo Alto High School
on Sep 11, 2023 at 5:01 pm
Registered user
on Sep 11, 2023 at 5:01 pm
The Paly Voice published a story on this topic over the weekend. Web Link
Registered user
Duveneck/St. Francis
on Sep 11, 2023 at 5:15 pm
Registered user
on Sep 11, 2023 at 5:15 pm
Some teachers do not want to live in/nearby the communities where they teach.
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Sep 11, 2023 at 5:33 pm
Registered user
on Sep 11, 2023 at 5:33 pm
"The five-story building would include 24 studios, 20 one-bedroom apartments and a rooftop deck for residents, according to project plans."
"Council packet says 22 garage parking spaces in stackers for 44 units. I hope half the teachers can get by without cars!"
Guess teachers don't need cars to get to work AND don't have kids since there are no 2 bedroom apartments.
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Sep 15, 2023 at 5:10 pm
Registered user
on Sep 15, 2023 at 5:10 pm
This project will consist primarily of tiny studios (24) and small one-bedrooms (20). Zero 2-bedroom units. Meanwhile, the majority of teachers need TWO-BEDROOM apartments, not tiny studios. This sounds to me a lot like tech bro singles housing being marketed as teacher housing, which is likely to remain empty just like the current empty building of tiny studios located on the corner of El Camino and Oregon Expressway.
For evidence of what housing teachers need, see a recent PAO article which reported:
Web Link
"Palo Alto Unified conducted a survey of its staff in fall 2022 and received 292 responses. The results showed that 7% of respondents wanted a studio, 34% a one bedroom and 60% a two bedroom."
This is important because the other teacher housing project (the subsidized one) will contain mostly one-bedrooms rather than the housing stock most in demand: 2-bedroom units.
This is exactly why corporate for-profit developers are rarely a good fit for affordable housing. In their quest to achieve profitability, they often/usually/always shrink the units so that no couple (let alone family with kids) can live there remotely comfortably.
The other benefit of filling these buildings with liveable 2-bedroom units is that it would reduce the need parking spots. In other words, 24 2-bedroom units almost always create less traffic than 48 studios.
For those who argue that we need homes of all sizes, I agree! Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, every housing project proposed by private developers in Palo Alto in the past three years has involved postage-stamp sized units. That does not create a neighborhood; it creates either overcrowding or else an influx of tech workers, many of whom will use the units as second homes near their offices.
We need to build what people NEED, and for teachers, that means 2-bedroom apts, not studios.
Registered user
another community
on Sep 15, 2023 at 6:31 pm
Registered user
on Sep 15, 2023 at 6:31 pm
I appreciate the project, and I'm concerned about weasel words like "affordable" and "teacher focused."
In particular, I don't see anything in the description that would suggest that rents on units will be deed restricted by income category as are traditional BMR units, and I don't seen any conditions of approval or description of a developer's agreement that would give occupancy preference to teachers and or any other "workforce" members.
Hopefully council will get rents and occupant priorities nailed down contractually rather than trusting the good will and marketing of the developer.
Trust but verify through conditions of approval, deed restrictions that run with the land, and developer's agreements.