News

Code changes aim to spark conversions to electric appliances

Rule revisions seek to give residents more flexibility to install heat pumps, charging stations

A workers attachs cables to a new all-electric heating, ventilation and air conditioning unit before it is lifted onto the rooftop of the Peninsula Conservation Center in Palo Alto on Jan. 25, 2023. Photo by Magali Gauthier.

Seeking to persuade more residents to transition from gas to electric appliances, Palo Alto approved a series of rule changes on Oct. 2 that aim to make it easier for residents to install equipment in their yards.

The changes that the City Council approved to the Municipal Code by a 6-0 vote, with Council member Julie Lythcott-Haims recusing, target two areas that often pose a hurdle for residents looking to install electric appliances: space and noise. They allow residents to install things like heat pumps, energy-storage systems and charging stations for their vehicles in their side yards, provided they maintain a 3-foot clearance to the side and rear of property for access.

Residents will also be allowed now to encroach into required parking spaces when installing such equipment.

On the noise front, the council agreed to adopt new rules for electrification equipment, with different standards for properties east and west of Foothill Expressway. The difference is based on existing ambient noise levels, which tend to be higher east of Foothill than in the west. Under the new law, areas east of Foothill have a compliance standard level of 50 decibels (dBA) at the property line, which is roughly equivalent to a humming refrigerator or a quiet conversation. West of Foothill, the threshold for electrification equipment would be 40 dBA.

In either region, residents would be able to exceed the standard by up to 5 dBA when they are installing heat pumps with inverter compressors, motors that regulate speeds and allow the heating equipment to run at less than 100% capacity when the weather is not fluctuating (they thus tend to be quieter and more efficient than traditional heat pumps). The threshold for heat pumps without inverters would be 3 dBA.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Louder equipment would still be allowed, though it would need to be installed farther from the property line to comply with the new noise restrictions.

The objective of the ordinance is to help the city meet its 80x30 goal, which calls for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions by 80% by 2030, with 1990 as the baseline. A key component of the strategy — one that the city is prioritizing above all others — is electrification. Earlier this year, the city debuted a program to encourage residents to install heat pump water heaters and to finance these appliances with on-bill payments over time. The city wants to facilitate 1,000 such conversions within a year.

Another goal, and one that the new zoning ordinance tried to achieve, is facilitating these conversions without causing friction between neighbors over humming equipment too close to the fence.

"There is this balance we're trying to achieve between trying to advance electrification equipment and help achieve our sustainability and climate action goals with the expectation of the quiet enjoyment of residential properties," Planning Director Jonathan Lait said at the Oct. 2 meeting.

Some suggested that the city go further in relaxing noise restrictions, particularly for heat pumps that use inverter compressors.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Brett Andersen, board member at Carbon Free Palo Alto, was among them. Andersen said he had been shopping for a heat pump for the last few years but was told he couldn't install one in his side yard because of the noise ordinance. In support of the city's effort to ease restrictions, he suggested looser standards for heat pumps with inverters, which he said are about 10 dBA lower than traditional models.

"We need to address the side yard issue and I think the (noise) levels that we have here just aren't appropriate for what's available there," Andersen said.

Bruce Hodge, founder of Carbon Free Palo Alto, also argued that the new standards proposed by staff are too stringent and would still keep many people from installing the equipment in their side yards.

Heat pumps with inverters are very quiet most of the time, Hodge said. He suggested that residents be allowed to exceed ambient noise levels by 12 to 15 dBA when they are installing such pumps in their side yards and 8 dBA for other technologies.

"It's not clear that the creation of two arbitrary noise zones that mandate either 40 or 50 dBA at the property line is a step forward since it is more stringent in some cases and less stringent in others, compared to the current code," Hodge said.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

But resident Hamilton Hitchings fully supported the proposed change, which he said will allow him to install an electric HVAC heat pump in his home. He noted that the Planning and Transportation Commission had approved the revisions unanimously and urged the council to approve them too.

"These enable more homes in Palo Alto to convert their gas, heating and cars to run 100% on Palo Alto municipal utility's renewable electricity," Hitchings said.

While the council generally supported staff's approach, council member Pat Burt proposed a modification to allow residents to exceed noise standards by 5 dBA for heat pumps with inverters and by 3 dBA for the traditional variety. The council unanimously backed the suggestion.

Burt suggested that such an increase would be barely perceptible, particularly in side yards, which aren't known for being popular gathering spots. The city, he said, should focus its efforts on protecting residents from the impact of noise when they are in their homes or in their yards, he said.

"We're not trying to accomplish active peaceful use of our side yards, which is not what any of us do. … I never have. My neighbors don't," Burt said.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Code changes aim to spark conversions to electric appliances

Rule revisions seek to give residents more flexibility to install heat pumps, charging stations

Seeking to persuade more residents to transition from gas to electric appliances, Palo Alto approved a series of rule changes on Oct. 2 that aim to make it easier for residents to install equipment in their yards.

The changes that the City Council approved to the Municipal Code by a 6-0 vote, with Council member Julie Lythcott-Haims recusing, target two areas that often pose a hurdle for residents looking to install electric appliances: space and noise. They allow residents to install things like heat pumps, energy-storage systems and charging stations for their vehicles in their side yards, provided they maintain a 3-foot clearance to the side and rear of property for access.

Residents will also be allowed now to encroach into required parking spaces when installing such equipment.

On the noise front, the council agreed to adopt new rules for electrification equipment, with different standards for properties east and west of Foothill Expressway. The difference is based on existing ambient noise levels, which tend to be higher east of Foothill than in the west. Under the new law, areas east of Foothill have a compliance standard level of 50 decibels (dBA) at the property line, which is roughly equivalent to a humming refrigerator or a quiet conversation. West of Foothill, the threshold for electrification equipment would be 40 dBA.

In either region, residents would be able to exceed the standard by up to 5 dBA when they are installing heat pumps with inverter compressors, motors that regulate speeds and allow the heating equipment to run at less than 100% capacity when the weather is not fluctuating (they thus tend to be quieter and more efficient than traditional heat pumps). The threshold for heat pumps without inverters would be 3 dBA.

Louder equipment would still be allowed, though it would need to be installed farther from the property line to comply with the new noise restrictions.

The objective of the ordinance is to help the city meet its 80x30 goal, which calls for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions by 80% by 2030, with 1990 as the baseline. A key component of the strategy — one that the city is prioritizing above all others — is electrification. Earlier this year, the city debuted a program to encourage residents to install heat pump water heaters and to finance these appliances with on-bill payments over time. The city wants to facilitate 1,000 such conversions within a year.

Another goal, and one that the new zoning ordinance tried to achieve, is facilitating these conversions without causing friction between neighbors over humming equipment too close to the fence.

"There is this balance we're trying to achieve between trying to advance electrification equipment and help achieve our sustainability and climate action goals with the expectation of the quiet enjoyment of residential properties," Planning Director Jonathan Lait said at the Oct. 2 meeting.

Some suggested that the city go further in relaxing noise restrictions, particularly for heat pumps that use inverter compressors.

Brett Andersen, board member at Carbon Free Palo Alto, was among them. Andersen said he had been shopping for a heat pump for the last few years but was told he couldn't install one in his side yard because of the noise ordinance. In support of the city's effort to ease restrictions, he suggested looser standards for heat pumps with inverters, which he said are about 10 dBA lower than traditional models.

"We need to address the side yard issue and I think the (noise) levels that we have here just aren't appropriate for what's available there," Andersen said.

Bruce Hodge, founder of Carbon Free Palo Alto, also argued that the new standards proposed by staff are too stringent and would still keep many people from installing the equipment in their side yards.

Heat pumps with inverters are very quiet most of the time, Hodge said. He suggested that residents be allowed to exceed ambient noise levels by 12 to 15 dBA when they are installing such pumps in their side yards and 8 dBA for other technologies.

"It's not clear that the creation of two arbitrary noise zones that mandate either 40 or 50 dBA at the property line is a step forward since it is more stringent in some cases and less stringent in others, compared to the current code," Hodge said.

But resident Hamilton Hitchings fully supported the proposed change, which he said will allow him to install an electric HVAC heat pump in his home. He noted that the Planning and Transportation Commission had approved the revisions unanimously and urged the council to approve them too.

"These enable more homes in Palo Alto to convert their gas, heating and cars to run 100% on Palo Alto municipal utility's renewable electricity," Hitchings said.

While the council generally supported staff's approach, council member Pat Burt proposed a modification to allow residents to exceed noise standards by 5 dBA for heat pumps with inverters and by 3 dBA for the traditional variety. The council unanimously backed the suggestion.

Burt suggested that such an increase would be barely perceptible, particularly in side yards, which aren't known for being popular gathering spots. The city, he said, should focus its efforts on protecting residents from the impact of noise when they are in their homes or in their yards, he said.

"We're not trying to accomplish active peaceful use of our side yards, which is not what any of us do. … I never have. My neighbors don't," Burt said.

Comments

cmarg
Registered user
University South
on Oct 4, 2023 at 10:23 am
cmarg, University South
Registered user
on Oct 4, 2023 at 10:23 am

I feel the big issue is the cost. Even with the funding from the city for the water heater, it was going to be around $5K for ~1600 square foot home. In my opinion electrification at this point is an ideal scenario for new construction or those with quite a bit of money. I am a strong advocate of helping the environment and at this point feel there are other ways I can reduce my footprint. Get more people to participate in the CoolBlock program to see what can be done to reduce one's footprint. Just my opinion.
Cecilia


Hamilton
Registered user
Duveneck/St. Francis
on Oct 4, 2023 at 10:29 am
Hamilton, Duveneck/St. Francis
Registered user
on Oct 4, 2023 at 10:29 am

Although not mentioned in the article, I also requested an additional 3 dba for heat pumps so they can be placed in the side yards of homes. 3 dba is considered a barely perceptible change in sound. All 7 public speakers requested more lenient noise standards to allow placement in the side yard for these heat pumps. The variable speed heat pumps are much quieter than traditional air conditioning but also can heat your house in the winter.


Christine Czarnecki
Registered user
Midtown
on Oct 4, 2023 at 2:41 pm
Christine Czarnecki, Midtown
Registered user
on Oct 4, 2023 at 2:41 pm

I was shocked to read Mr. Burt's quote to the effect of "No one uses his side yard."

Mr. Burt, just because you never use your side yard does not mean no one does! Our street in Midtown has many Coastwise tract houses, and they ALL have their patios on the sides of their houses! Indeed, several neighbor have major patios on both sides. The rear of the houses has their bedrooms.

My house was built in the early 2000s, so it has a more "modern" floor plan, with the kitchen and family room in the back of the house, leading out to the backyard., but my neighbors, all with much-remodeled post war houses, all have their patios on one side or the other, or both.

We must not think that "True for Me" is the same as "True for All."


Comment
Registered user
Downtown North
on Oct 4, 2023 at 3:02 pm
Comment, Downtown North
Registered user
on Oct 4, 2023 at 3:02 pm

Pat Burt - Just because side yard noise isn’t a problem at your house doesn’t mean it won’t be a problem for many others.
Our many screened bedroom windows are wide open throughout the warm/hot months - opening to our narrow side yard. We enjoy and rely on the cool fresh air. The loudest sound is crickets at night.
This natural cooling and the cricket’s music will end for us, replaced by adjacent machine noise, 24/7.
This decision stinks.





Online Name
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Oct 4, 2023 at 3:28 pm
Online Name, Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
Registered user
on Oct 4, 2023 at 3:28 pm

Haven't we already got enough noise from traffic airplanes etc? What's PA doing about airplane noise, a long-standing issue??

We also use our side yards. Mr. Burt's unfortunate and erroneous assumption typifies the uninformed decision-making in Palo Alto. It would be nice if our "leaders" did their homework before forcing their virtue-signalling policies on us.

This is only the latest example this WEEK when we also found out the city "quietly" decided to drop undergrounding utilities and to FINALLY admit that those neighborhoods already undergrounded won't get Fiber to The Home, something we already knew and inquired about months ago even though it apparently shocked CPAU which asked US which neighborhoods had been undergrounded..

But hey, what's a few hundred million dollars? And thanks for the Fiber "Survey" that asked for advance deposits but didn't let us say we didn't want fiber and that we'd rather spend the money elsewhere!


Ocam's Razor
Registered user
Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Oct 4, 2023 at 4:25 pm
Ocam's Razor, Leland Manor/Garland Drive
Registered user
on Oct 4, 2023 at 4:25 pm

Interesting narrative in making allowances with location and noise. We should consider neighbors homes and yards over any allowance. And if we are allowing more noise, then let landscapers use their gas cutters/ blowers which are more efficient and with faster job completion.

With regard to the move to electric, let's remember that California has a weak power grid buying electricity from out of state and oil from foreign countries to make up for the Brown/ Newsom oil production cuts.

I will consider transitioning from efficient natural gas hot water/ heating/ cooking to electric heat pumps when there is a zero cost for the heat pump, installation, associated electrical work and new appliances.


Mondoman
Registered user
Green Acres
on Oct 4, 2023 at 6:06 pm
Mondoman, Green Acres
Registered user
on Oct 4, 2023 at 6:06 pm

Our neighborhood also has patios on the side for many of its houses. Perhaps CM Burt was thinking of houses with only narrow alley-like side "yards".


Donald
Registered user
South of Midtown
on Oct 4, 2023 at 9:49 pm
Donald, South of Midtown
Registered user
on Oct 4, 2023 at 9:49 pm

I am glad to see more attention being paid to heat pump HVAC systems and not just heat pump water heaters. 2/3 of our household natural gas usage per year is for our (92% efficiency rated) furnace, which only runs for 4 months (Nov-Feb). We are preparing to install a heat pump in our side yard, which will comply with the old standards, but which will reduce our gas usage and also provide us with cooling in the summer which we do not have now. There are no City-provided incentives for this as there are for water heaters. We will also switch our water heater but it will not have nearly the impact that the HVAC system will.


Neal
Registered user
Community Center
on Oct 6, 2023 at 2:42 pm
Neal, Community Center
Registered user
on Oct 6, 2023 at 2:42 pm

If my neighbor installs a heat pump that I find annoying loud, what is my recourse? Am stuck with this annoyance for ever? Some people are more noise sensitive than others and don't we have enough noise pollution in our lives already? This is another bad one size fits all City policy.


MyFeelz
Registered user
another community
on Oct 6, 2023 at 8:50 pm
MyFeelz, another community
Registered user
on Oct 6, 2023 at 8:50 pm

"The changes that the City Council approved to the Municipal Code by a 6-0 vote, with Council member Julie Lythcott-Haims recusing" -- was a reason given? Is she giving speeches about or otherwise engaging in conduct prohibited by the FPCC? Is she an investor, procuring electrical devices for resale to homeowners? Or does she manage or own one of the companies who are partners with the City in promoting the program? I'm sure there's a simple reason that I missed when I read the article.

There are more factors than noise ... I need help with understanding that these devices will not create even 1 degree of difference in a formerly "hardly ever used" side yard. I can't even stand to boot up my laptop because it creates my very own microclimate of heat.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.