Minutes after honoring victims in Israel and Gaza with an expression of solidarity and a moment of silence, Palo Alto City Council members found themselves confronted by racist and anti-Semitic comments during the public comment period of their Oct. 16 meeting.
The city was the latest to experience "Zoom bombing," a national trend in which commenters call in to public meetings with lewd, homophobic, racist and vulgar remarks. Similar incidents have recently happened in communities such as Atherton and Redwood City.
Response from the cities has been varied. As the Redwood City Pulse reported earlier this month, Atherton recently removed the ability of speakers to unmute themselves, share screens or independently change their login name. Redwood City abolished the ability of public speakers to address the council by Zoom altogether.
Palo Alto, for its part, hadn't experienced the phenomenon since the early days of the pandemic, when Zoom meetings became a norm. Several council members were left visibly stunned and disgusted Monday after the comments and responded by publicly denouncing them.
The comments were delivered shortly after Mayor Lydia Kou kicked off the meeting with an address that denounced the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas on Israel and implored members of the community to comfort each other during a time of sadness and uncertainty.
"Member of our Jewish community have expressed deep fear during these attacks and threats, which have compounded the community's fears, already heightened by the rise of anti-Semitism around our nation," Kou said.
"Members of our Muslim community also feel the pain and fear of rising Islamophobia, and we are all shocked and saddened by the murder of a young American child, targeted simply because he is Muslim," she added, referring to the Oct. 14 murder of a 6-year-old boy in Illinois.
She urged residents to "take a moment to care for each other, console each other and embrace each other, not through the prism of politics, but through the connection of our shared humanity."
"Many of our residents are not OK. I am not OK. Let's remember that and speak with kindness to each other," Kou said.
After the first of the two anti-Semitic speeches, Kou interjected to say that she and her colleagues "denounce the speakers' message of discrimination and hate" and said the city is "committed to a culture of acceptance where all members of our community feel included, safe and respected."
She repeated the comment later in the meeting, when a third speaker asked to comment on a separate agenda item and made an anti-Semitic comment. And she reiterated it again several times during the council's subsequent discussion about the proposed redevelopment of Cubberley Community Center, when an additional eight speakers addressed the council with vulgar and racist comments.
"We have allowed this speech only because the First Amendment of the Constitution requires us to give everyone an equal chance to express their views," Kou said after the second comment.
She also welcomed city staff to leave the room if additional speakers use hate speech during their public comments.
After the second comment, Kou suspended the public speaking period until later in the meeting so that the council could proceed with its regular business. Several of her colleagues quickly joined her in denouncing the speakers' comments.
"Everybody in this room deserves better than we just went through," Council member Julie Lythcott-Haims said. "For staff, for whom this is the workplace, for council members for whom this is the workplace, for the public for whom this is our public meeting place, I want to express compassion for all who've been attacked by the reprehensible things we just heard."
Council member Pat Burt also denounced what he called "the hatefulness and ignorance of the speakers who just spoke before us so despicably."
"This has been going on throughout the Bay Area," Burt said. "City councils have been Zoom bombed by a group of white supremacists, and unfortunately the legal restrictions do not allow us to prevent them from speech that is not truly disruptive of the meeting so we all must sit through it — and I won't say tolerate it."
Council member Vicki Veenker also expressed sympathy for all the victims in the current conflict and said she has been reaching out to friends who have been affected.
"My heart bleeds for those who lost or will lose loved ones in the conflict or who feel unsafe here at home," Veenker said. "It is easy to feel powerless, but what we can do is to take care of each other in our own city."
Comments
Registered user
Downtown North
on Oct 16, 2023 at 9:11 pm
Registered user
on Oct 16, 2023 at 9:11 pm
Mayor Kou’s opening comment was good and heartfelt. Thank you Mayor.
Tonights hateful public comments at Council were unlike anything heard here before. They were designed to wind us up. The only good news is that Palo Altans completely reject their twisted pronouncements.
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Oct 16, 2023 at 9:23 pm
Registered user
on Oct 16, 2023 at 9:23 pm
Thank you, Mayor Kou.
Unfortunately the haters are Hate Zooming public meetings all over the Bay Area and -- as my Google news search showed -- all over the country which has forced cities to limit public comments to written and in-person.
Registered user
another community
on Oct 16, 2023 at 9:49 pm
Registered user
on Oct 16, 2023 at 9:49 pm
Sadly, this is happening all over the Bay Area. If this is happening on Zoom, you disable the chat. Redwood City got it right. You abolish the speakers, and the problem is solved.
Registered user
College Terrace
on Oct 16, 2023 at 10:22 pm
Registered user
on Oct 16, 2023 at 10:22 pm
Peace begins with me.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Oct 17, 2023 at 7:44 am
Registered user
on Oct 17, 2023 at 7:44 am
Beyond belief, but sadly I am no longer surprised.
Registered user
Community Center
on Oct 17, 2023 at 10:30 am
Registered user
on Oct 17, 2023 at 10:30 am
Antisemitism and hate are the causes Zoom bombers spend their time on? Really? Are they trolling? Is this just entertainment for them? Can they not find any other way to feel better about themselves and do something useful with their lives?
Registered user
another community
on Oct 17, 2023 at 10:35 am
Registered user
on Oct 17, 2023 at 10:35 am
Maybe it would be a good idea just to stick to city business and save the international issues for those at the U.S. State Department.
Given the nature of the situation and the access provided by technology, making comments at the city level may not be appropriate in this specific forum. Maybe the mayor could have issued a statement through her office off camera.
Yes, I know there are many in the community reeling from the events in the Middle East who look to leaders to soothe their pain, and I agree 100% with the Mayor's sentiments, but sometimes just sticking to city business is the way to go. Hopefully lessons will be learned after this abuse of free speech by those who are simply seeking attention. Sad fact is that they will not go away, so you must find ways to limit their opportunities.
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Oct 17, 2023 at 10:48 am
Registered user
on Oct 17, 2023 at 10:48 am
Of course they're trolling and as for entertainment value, it seems that the more outrageous they can get, they do so their antics can make the news.
Re pedophilia, a national survey from a respected firm found that almost 20% of Republicans surveyed believe that ALL Democrats are pedophiles. Remember Pizzagate from 2016 when the conspiracy theorists kept beating the drum that Hillary and Leon Panetta were running a child pedophile ring in the basement of Comet Pizza? Remember how some heavily armed southerner drove up to DC to rescue those poor abused kids?
The was NO basement and NO child sex ring. He later apologized. Web Link
A quick search on "Pizzagate" to remind myself of the date shows Pizzagate is STILL alive and well, that people again set fire to the pizza place, that there are new Facebook groups devoted to it and that Trump hosted an event featuring the PizzaGate conspiracy theorists December 2022, one month before January 6 when they tried to overturn the election:
Web Link
Registered user
Barron Park
on Oct 17, 2023 at 11:13 am
Registered user
on Oct 17, 2023 at 11:13 am
This was a predictable outcome. Why would the mayor be so naïve as to invite the inevitable antisemitic comments? Perhaps the council should have learned from our other communities that opening up the forum, inevitably leads to hurtful comments.
An empty statement by the mayor and council members that this community denounces hate, and that we can do better have no help. Actions speak louder than words. Silence those comments rather than giving them a forum.
I do agree, that we deserve better – a better mayor, and a better city Council that can offer more than weak words.
Registered user
Midtown
on Oct 17, 2023 at 12:45 pm
Registered user
on Oct 17, 2023 at 12:45 pm
I have participated in public life ever since I was a teenager growing up here in Palo Alto during the 1970's. I received my first antisemitic hate letter, addressed to my home address (with a return address!) when I was about 17 years old. Similar letters and phone calls followed with some regularity, some containing death threats (I have a file of these from years gone by, all were shared with the authorities). At one point, our excellent PAPD parked a squad car out in front of our house on Edgewood 24/7 to help me and my family feel safer, with the police checking in on us from time to time. These zoom calls are of course horrifying. But one benefit is that now the rest of the community understands what some of us have been dealing with for a very long time.
Registered user
Charleston Meadows
on Oct 17, 2023 at 6:06 pm
Registered user
on Oct 17, 2023 at 6:06 pm
Nobody uses Zoom anymore
Registered user
Barron Park
on Oct 18, 2023 at 7:30 am
Registered user
on Oct 18, 2023 at 7:30 am
I read this article with disappoint and disgust....not with the speakers (First Amendment) but with the City Council. I suppose this 'obligation' started in the 60's with the Vietnam War where the Council started getting involved in speaking out against the War. This has now evolved into believing that they are obligated to say something about every headline national/international event. Personally, I did not vote for City Councilmembers to provide their personal opinions on national/international events. These events should not even be mentioned - unless they intend to spend City money supporting one side or the other. The City Council opened the window for such comments by bringing it up themselves - they asked for it. The Council should refrain from discussing national/international events and install a protocol to cut-off speakers who talk about anything other than City business.
Registered user
Green Acres
on Oct 19, 2023 at 11:18 am
Registered user
on Oct 19, 2023 at 11:18 am
As others have noted, there's an easy technical fix - just delay the zoom feed 2-3 seconds and have a person monitor the undelayed feed on headphones. If a bomb hits, the monitor just hits a switch to mute and disconnect the comment, and nobody else ever hears it. This "tape delay" strategy has been used for more than 50 years by broadcasters.
The PAUSD according to a new story here has scheduled an emergency meeting tomorrow to cancel all virtual commenting immediately at their Board meetings, even though they haven't even been hit by a zoom bombing! This is unacceptable and seems to me to just be a way to cut off public comment about their too-often-flawed policies.
Contact the Board members to tell them what a bad idea this is!
Registered user
College Terrace
on Oct 21, 2023 at 10:52 pm
Registered user
on Oct 21, 2023 at 10:52 pm
@John There was no cause and effect on Monday between the mayor’s statement and the Zoom bombers. The time difference was too short. This was a planed, coordinated attack that happened to coincide at the same meeting as the mayor’s remarks.
Registered user
College Terrace
on Oct 24, 2023 at 12:56 pm
Registered user
on Oct 24, 2023 at 12:56 pm
My comments at CC yesterday:
Thank you Mayor Kou for your sincere and personal appeal last week to unite in common grief and to move forward with common humanity in troubled times.
Now, how do we best protect the community and our open processes in the wake of the planned, coordinated, and hateful attacks that coincidentally followed; a series of gut punches to anyone who experienced it.
Pre-pandemic, pre-remote public participation, on rare occasion hateful words have been spoken at this meeting. But there was an important difference: we could see who the speakers were, which was a deterrent to their returning.
Both then and now, for all numbered agenda items, as per your written procedures: “Public comments or testimony must be related to the matter under consideration.” Therefore, the mayor should and did interrupt and shut off any speaker who, after fair warning, strayed from the agenda item.
I recommend the warning and the trigger be sooner and any follow-up statement be held until the bigot is completely off-line.
But in the un-numbered public comment period – this one – it is the speaker who chooses the topic and who can inject hate speech, shielded by its First Amendment protections.
Staff and/or council leaving the room, facing away, or listening but not tolerating are not the best responses in my view. Because there is no First Amendment right to remote public comment.
And so, I recommend that for this “open mike” public comment period only, speakers should be required to be present in the chambers.
Our good citizenry who cannot attend, can write to the council directly or ask a friend to speak here on their behalf.
It is a small price to pay to give pause to those who seek cover in the shadows for their hate.
And to allay any fears in these chambers as well as to maintain decorum, which was breached during this public comment period last week, there should be a uniformed public safety officer present during that time.
##