Emboldened by a new state law, the developer looking to renovate the former Antonio's Nut House building on Palo Alto's California Avenue has proposed revised plans that remove most parking spaces and expand its dining courtyard.
Hayes Group Architects, which is designing the project at 321 California Ave., received formal approval in October 2022 for its plan to demolish the building's rear addition and create a dining pavilion and a courtyard topped by a trellis.
The same month, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 2097, legislation authored by Assembly member Laura Friedman, D-Glendale, that eliminates parking requirements within a half mile of a transit station.
While the bill, which took effect on Jan. 1, 2023, was lauded by housing advocates for reducing the cost of building residential projects in transit-friendly areas, its provisions are equally applicable to commercial areas.
In advocating for the bill, Friedman argued that the legislation would allow property owners "to decide on their own how much on-site parking to provide, instead of requiring them to comply with a one-size-fits-all mandate," according to a report from the Legislative Analyst's Office.
In the case of the former Nut House building, which is a block from the California Avenue Caltrain station, the property owner is suggesting that it doesn't require much parking at all. Because of the legislation, the Nut House does not need to provide the parking spaces that it otherwise would have been required to include to meet the city's zoning code.
The previously approved application included 11 on-site spaces, an already significant reduction from the 31 that a restaurant of that size would normally be required to offer under the zoning code. The property owner met its obligation for another 18 spaces by paying into the California Avenue Parking Assessment District. Then city also granted its request to reduce the parking requirement by another two spaces in exchange for site upgrades that improve circulation or help meet waste-management objectives, bringing the parking requirement down from 13 to 11.
The new plan, which Hayes submitted on Oct. 16 on behalf of the property owner, Stormland LLC, eliminate most of the prior plan's off-street parking spaces. In invoking AB 2097, the amount of proposed parking is now zero, though the developer has agreed to include three spaces at the rear of the property, near Jacaranda Lane: one for a van, another for an electric vehicle and a third, between them, that would function as a loading zone.
The design of the restaurant was also revised to retain the 1969 building addition, which will no longer need to be demolished to make way for parking spaces. The plan also eliminates the dining pavilion that was included in the prior design. Now, the courtyard would be extended and covered with a larger trellis.
"The courtyard and trellis provide an open-air dining space located centrally to the existing building," architect Ken Hayes wrote in the new application. "A low, multilayered landscape wall circumscribes the courtyard, mediating the boundary between an active street and outdoor dining room."
As in the prior design, the renovated restaurant would include an outdoor lounge at the building's entrance in which guests could linger temporarily before moving on to the restaurant or courtyard, Hayes wrote to the city.
The existing building would also be repainted and refurbished, with worn-down stucco patched, Hayes wrote. The original entry into the building facing Birch Street would be in-filled with a frameless glass door and a narrow vertical window, he wrote. The plan also calls for replacing the doorway from California Avenue with a vestibule, also enclosed with frameless glass.
The building has been vacant since the Nut House — a popular bar and restaurant known for booze, bites, pool tables and abundant peanut shells — shut down in 2020 after 49 years of operation. Hayes noted in the application that a tenant has not yet been selected for the new restaurant.
Comments
Registered user
Mayfield
on Oct 23, 2023 at 2:15 am
Registered user
on Oct 23, 2023 at 2:15 am
As the last photo in the article shows, the site of the former Nut House is right next to a huge parking structure. It makes sense not to require parking for the new business.
A takeaway here is how much valuable real estate is taken up by parking. If we did not rely so much on cars, that space could be hused for housing and revenue-generating buinesses, thus expanding the tax base.
Registered user
Crescent Park
on Oct 23, 2023 at 8:05 am
Registered user
on Oct 23, 2023 at 8:05 am
How could anyone in their right mind think that having a Caltrain stop near a restaurant makes it unnecessary to have parking?
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Oct 23, 2023 at 9:53 am
Registered user
on Oct 23, 2023 at 9:53 am
"How could anyone in their right mind think that having a Caltrain stop near a restaurant makes it unnecessary to have parking?"
Because they'll use any excuse to justify their density push no matter how insane?
See also: workers don't need cars to get to work, build housing close to jobs because Silicon Valley workers never ever change jobs, tolls and congestion pricing will reduce car traffic although we're forced to absorb 1,000,000 more housing units....
Registered user
Ventura
on Oct 23, 2023 at 10:21 am
Registered user
on Oct 23, 2023 at 10:21 am
@Bart Anderson. I agree. As we move California to a pedestrian walkway, why do we need parking at the old site? There is a parking garage right next to it. None of the other restaurants on that block have parking, including the ones right across the street. Let’s increase the outdoor space.
Registered user
Evergreen Park
on Oct 23, 2023 at 11:59 am
Registered user
on Oct 23, 2023 at 11:59 am
As another commenter shows, there is a giant parking structure directly behind the site. Even at its busiest times, like Sunday Farmers Market, that structure has ample space. And that's notwithstanding the additional ample parking on adjacent streets.
A great step to ensuring less wasted space and less implicit subsidy for car culture. Good move that benefits the street and the community.
Registered user
Evergreen Park
on Oct 23, 2023 at 1:53 pm
Registered user
on Oct 23, 2023 at 1:53 pm
How kind, and convenient,of the bill’s authors to insure that a provision meant to facilitate the building of affordable housing could be used to increase the profits of commercial developers. This is not more ‘outdoor’ or ‘community’ space.’ It is more room in which to make money. Can we call this what it really is? A transfer of money from the City (who built the parking lot at its own expense) to developers/business owners. Those who think no one needs a car is delusional given the lack of decent public transport ion (and no, a single north-south train doesn’t qualify, and I don’t see people riding the bus to Cal Ave to have dinner).
Registered user
Professorville
on Oct 23, 2023 at 9:12 pm
Registered user
on Oct 23, 2023 at 9:12 pm
I am having flashbacks of the patio at (ye old) Kirk's on California Ave., which was a lovely place for a lunchtime burger.
Registered user
College Terrace
on Oct 23, 2023 at 10:53 pm
Registered user
on Oct 23, 2023 at 10:53 pm
Definitely an homage to the old Kirks outdoor patio. But then again one could expect nothing less from the Hayes group architects.
Registered user
University South
on Oct 24, 2023 at 1:22 pm
Registered user
on Oct 24, 2023 at 1:22 pm
Despite the fact they are wrong, I at least normally _understand_ the PoV of the parking mandate people -- it can be inconvenient to look for parking!
But look at those pictures! It's literally right next to a newly-built multi-million dollar parking structure! I consider myself an emphatic person, but I am not able to imagine the thought process that looks at this story and says, "hmm, rather than any productive use, we should force the owners of that property to leave it as empty space for ten more cars."
Registered user
Downtown North
on Oct 24, 2023 at 5:47 pm
Registered user
on Oct 24, 2023 at 5:47 pm
I personally believe that requiring businesses to build an arbitrary amount of parking is not a good statute. Using this house bill, business can build without needing to cater to car-owners, and build for the people and customers rather than cars. Our cities have long been stained by car-centric urban planning, and thankfully that stain is slowly being cleaned out.
Registered user
College Terrace
on Oct 25, 2023 at 10:34 am
Registered user
on Oct 25, 2023 at 10:34 am
Henry Grabar's book, Paved Paradise: How Parking Explains the World, does an excellent job explaining the damage parking minimums have done to our cities and how many cities are now working to repair that damage.
Registered user
Barron Park
on Oct 26, 2023 at 11:27 am
Registered user
on Oct 26, 2023 at 11:27 am
Antonio's Nut House is too valuable a community space to convert into another high end restaurant. It would be far more useful as a city-owned community space with a few retails to fill the void of practical needs--a teen center with art/craft, tutoring, recreation drop in; meeting rooms for knitting/book/social groups (even could hold a weekend adult school class there), a small pharmacy, etc. to recapture some of the lost utility on Cal Ave.
Registered user
College Terrace
on Oct 28, 2023 at 12:51 pm
Registered user
on Oct 28, 2023 at 12:51 pm
Like it or not, the need for parking is a reality that should be planned for so that people frequent the businesses in an area. We drive and that is not likely to change significantly enough in the foreseeable future to pretend otherwise. In this case, the Antonio's location is close enough to the public garage that it is probably okay to not require additional parking, but the developer should be required to make an in-lieu contribution. And if our darling legislators have managed to pass legislation that gives them a way around this, the developer should acknowledge the stupidity of that exemption and do it anyway. And those legislators should not be re-elected b/c they are not smart.
About how cities are planned: I find it "amusing" that the image chosen for the new city that a handful of wealthy tech investors are planning in Solana County looks inspired more by Birge Clark than Ken Hayes. It also looks a bit utopian, like an updated, hip version of Disney's Main Street. The developer who took over the block where JJ&F once was started out with appealing images of what was to come. Things didn't turn out quite so appealing. If I lived in Solano County, I'd be wary of all this early-stage sweet talk and happy planning.
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Oct 28, 2023 at 4:09 pm
Registered user
on Oct 28, 2023 at 4:09 pm
@Annette, the images of that Solano City of the future have been compared to the Riviera and there's been much criticism and commentary about how they were generated and the various inaccuracies. Lots of coverage the next time you're bored.
Re the replacement for JJ&F, you're the master / mistress of understatement.
Registered user
Midtown
on Nov 3, 2023 at 9:35 pm
Registered user
on Nov 3, 2023 at 9:35 pm
That is the most uninviting, cheap-looking building being proposed. It lacks warmth and looks like an office building designed with Legos. The Nut House had old skool charm that is being scrubbed in this new building and that is sad. As for parking, you would think there would be at least some ADA-compliant places near the building, but developers do not care about who will use the buildings, they just care about maximum profit.
I long for the day when real design skills and inviting places to hang out come back into fashion again. We'll look back on this era and cringe at these masculine-looking structures being built now.