A squat stucco building on El Camino Real that until recently housed an auto body shop would make way for a two-story, wood-paneled office building as part of the latest development proposal in Palo Alto's quickly changing Ventura neighborhood.
Pitched by Acclaim Companies, the project targets a site at 2905 El Camino Real, on the corner of Pepper Avenue. The vacant building most recently served as a supporting location for Akins Body Shop, which has a primary location at 3290 Park Boulevard. The auto shop's lease of the property concluded earlier this year, according to the application.
If approved, the new development would feature an outdoor patio and a roof terrace. It would include 8,571 square feet of office space, which would be occupied by a single tenant, according to project plans.
The new proposal is the latest in a slate of projects targeting Ventura, a centrally located but historically underserved neighborhood that is located southeast of the intersection of El Camino Real and Oregon Expressway. The site is located in the North Ventura Coordinated Plan Area, a portion of the neighborhood that the City Council had identified as suitable for redevelopment and that includes the sprawling campus that until recently was occupied by Fry's Electronics.
The most significant development in the project area is The Sobrato Organization's recently approved plan to partially demolish and renovate the historic cannery that housed Fry's. Sobrato plans to demolish about 40% of the building at 340 Portage Ave. and construct 74 townhouses. The remainder of the cannery would be renovated and retained for research and development use.
As part of the development agreement, Sobrato provided the city with land for a future park and an affordable housing complex.
Other projects within or near the North Ventura Area Plan district include a proposal by Charity Housing for 3000 El Camino Real, which would feature 129 apartments for low-income residents; a 16-condominium complex that Dividend Homes wants to build at 420 Acacia Ave.; and a 45-condominium project that developer Roger Fields is planning to construct at 300 Lambert Ave.
The city is also reviewing a proposal for a 44-apartment complex that Half Dome Capital wants to construct for local educators. And just south of this area, developers are advancing with even grander plans. Acclaim is looking to develop a 380-apartment building at 3150 El Camino Real, former site of The Fish Market restaurant, while Oxford Capital Group is pitching a 185-dwelling development at the site of Creekside Inn as part of a project that would also feature a new hotel building.
Both Acclaim and Oxford have indicated that they are willing to rely on "builder's remedy" – a contentious law that allows residential developers to override local zoning rules and objections – to get approval for their respective residential projects.
The plan by Acclaim for the El Camino site is unlike all the others because it consists entirely of office space, a land use that has fallen largely out of fashion in Palo Alto over the past decade. In 2015, the City Council established a cap of 50,000 square feet on new office development in downtown, along El Camino, and around California Avenue (it then made the cap permanent in 2018).
While the city's development pipeline includes a handful of commercial projects – most notably, a three-story office building that Smith Development has planned for 123 Sherman Ave. – most recent proposals have included a housing component.
The new building at 2905 El Camino Real would be clad in wood siding and feature metal panels, large windows and "light shelf canopies overlooking El Camino Real and Pepper Avenue." The second floor would be set back from the perimeter, and the building's roof terrace would open toward El Camino Real and allow for views to the distant hills, according to the project description submitted by architect Heather Young, principal at Heather Young Architects.
Young called the proposal a "dramatic improvement to the current conditions and a positive asset to the neighborhood."
"The proposed improvements will revitalize the aging building and site with a new, highly curated design with refined proportions and the use of more sophisticated materials creating a stronger presence on El Camino Real and an improved pedestrian and visual experience for the community and building occupants," Young wrote.
Comments
Registered user
Midtown
on Jan 4, 2024 at 7:00 pm
Registered user
on Jan 4, 2024 at 7:00 pm
Because there isn’t enough empty office space in Palo Alto??? Geez….
Registered user
Ventura
on Jan 5, 2024 at 8:28 am
Registered user
on Jan 5, 2024 at 8:28 am
There are empty office buildings all over town, and still, they continue to build them. Ventura is going to be a ghost town of office space. There must be big money in owning empty buildings! Someone should do an investigative report (hint hint).
And just a reminder: Developers refuse to build low-income or even affordable housing because there aren't insane profits to be made in doing so.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 5, 2024 at 10:09 am
Registered user
on Jan 5, 2024 at 10:09 am
What is going on with the stalled construction at El Camino / Portage (the site where Foot Locker used to be) ?
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Jan 5, 2024 at 10:16 am
Registered user
on Jan 5, 2024 at 10:16 am
More office space? Isn't the amount of office space (which translate to jobs) located in Palo Alto a major factor in why the city was assigned so much additional housing to build? This will only make our insurmountable quota problem worse.
Registered user
Ventura
on Jan 5, 2024 at 10:40 am
Registered user
on Jan 5, 2024 at 10:40 am
Why would Palo Alto add to the office/jobs vs. housing imbalance? Why should we approve a very short office building right on El Camino when this is prime territory for tall housing and there is a glut of empty office space all over the Bay Area? This project makes about as much sense as leaving most of the El Camino corridor vacant or vastly underutilized at a time when the state is begging Palo Alto to build more housing units.
Registered user
Professorville
on Jan 5, 2024 at 11:48 am
Registered user
on Jan 5, 2024 at 11:48 am
Will the ground floor be required to be “Retail”in all these office buildings. Many land owners were restricted from office use tenants on the ground floor and because of this zoning change less than ten years ago. It hurt many people. Just asking if the same will apply to these developers?
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Jan 5, 2024 at 12:01 pm
Registered user
on Jan 5, 2024 at 12:01 pm
With close to a 30% office vacancy rate, what a smart idea to add more offices and thus make the housing / office ratio even worse so our brilliant leaders can lobby for moire market rate housing.
Go DODOs (Developer Owned Developer Operated) politicians working tirelessly to create more gridlock!
Registered user
Barron Park
on Jan 5, 2024 at 5:12 pm
Registered user
on Jan 5, 2024 at 5:12 pm
@4good That concrete shell at the old Foot Locker site has been an eyesore for 5 years now. I read somewhere that when they were drilling down for supports, they hit the 'toxic plume' at that put an immediate halt to all construction. No idea what the resolution for something like that is.
Registered user
Evergreen Park
on Jan 5, 2024 at 10:52 pm
Registered user
on Jan 5, 2024 at 10:52 pm
When stories like this are written, I wonder why the impact of all of these developments on people who currently live in Ventura is never mentioned. These streets are very narrow are already and quite congested. With parking on both sides of the street, only one car at a time can move through. I have not seen any ideas for dealing with all of the increased traffic that will result. And let's be honest. The reason the City says this area is suitable to more development is that it is less expensive that the privileged north Palo Alto neighborhoods. So, the wealthier people will get to keep their relatively quiet, low rise neighborhoods while the less well off will get all of the development dumped on them. I wish there was a way to even things out more so that one target neighborhood doesn't bear the brunt of all of this massive development.
Registered user
Charleston Meadows
on Jan 6, 2024 at 9:20 am
Registered user
on Jan 6, 2024 at 9:20 am
@ Evergreen Park Observer
I second your comments. Your area is already clogged. Land is less expensive here in South PA, so we get all the development.
Registered user
College Terrace
on Jan 8, 2024 at 12:48 pm
Registered user
on Jan 8, 2024 at 12:48 pm
"You know what this place needs, more office space!" HahahahahahHAHA HA HA HA!
Registered user
College Terrace
on Jan 8, 2024 at 5:48 pm
Registered user
on Jan 8, 2024 at 5:48 pm
We need a moratorium on office building and change Palo Alto’s zoning to address the lack of land zoned for housing all the additional employees office zoning has created in recent decades.
Palo Alto’s zoning has become increasingly out of balance and outdated. The current ratio of land zoned between housing and commercial use was based on the now very outdated calculation of 250 sq ft per employee. However, in less than two decades, commercial property owners have been able to profit from office density increases that double, triple,and in some cases quadruple the number of employees without addressing the shortage of housing this creates in an already built out city.
Past time to revisit and update Palo Alto’s zoning to increase land available for housing and reduce that for offices so commercial property owners can help solve the need for new housing they have created. Starting with Stanford and their gradual switch since 2000 from low density research and manufacturing to high density tenants in the Research Park.