News

New coalition looks to revive effort to build Palo Alto gym

Friends group looks to raise more than $30M for a new wellness center

Lori Rock, center, leads line dancing lessons to seniors in the Senior Friendship Day program in Gym A at Cubberley Community Center on August 2, 2017. Embarcadero media file photo by Veronica Weber.

A new coalition that includes former mayors, philanthropists, athletes and civic volunteers is spearheading a $33-million campaign to revive a popular project: building Palo Alto's first city-owned gym.

The project has been on the city's radar since early 2022, when developer John Arrillaga proposed funding and building a new gym, a project that city officials had identified as a high priority for recreation needs. Arrillaga, who is known for constructing athletic facilities at Stanford University and in Menlo Park, was also planning to design, construct and spend about $30 million on the project.

But Arrillaga died shortly after he made the proposal and Palo Alto's gym project has been in limbo since, with plenty of community support but no financial backing or real plans to advance it.

Now, things may be turning around. At a Jan. 17 community meeting, city staff and volunteers with the new group Friends of Palo Alto Recreation & Wellness Center offered some uplifting news for local gym advocates. They've identified two potential locations: Greer Park and Cubberley Community Center. The fundraising drive is now kicking off. And the city's negotiations with the Palo Alto Unified School District, which owns much of Cubberley, are now speeding up after years of disagreements over its redevelopment.

The demand for a new gym has not diminished since Arrillaga's offer, according to Kristen O'Kane, director of the Community Services Department. By all accounts, Cubberley remains in shoddy shape. Some of its gym spaces have been unusable for more than a year due to water damage caused by leaking pipes. And even if they were functional, that part of Cubberley is the property of the school district, which owns 27 of the 35 acres on the center on Middlefield Road.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

"We do rent gyms from the school district at Cubberley, but we do not own any," O'Kane said. "And the need for gym space is increasing for youth sports, for adults, seniors and therapeutic recreation, which produces programming for people with disabilities."

The new Friends group is hoping to expand gym capacity by following the model that has been used in other local projects that leaned heavily on private donations, including the recently renovated $25 million Palo Alto Junior Museum and Zoo and the soon-to-be-completed $11.9 million Palo Alto Museum on Homer Avenue.

Former mayors Bern Beecham, who worked on the Junior Museum and Zoo project, and Tom DuBois, who strongly advocated for the history museum, are both members of the new Friends group. The team also includes former Mayor Judy Kleinberg as well as Parks and Recreation Commission members Anne Cribbs (a former Olympian), Jeff LaMere and Nellis Freeman. Other members include retired banker Roger Smith, former Deputy City Manager Steve Emslie, Tim Stitt, Yudy Deng and Marc Guillett.

Cribbs said a key goal is to get a gym built sooner rather than later.

"We'd like to see shovels in the ground as soon as we raise the money to build the gym and get permits," Cribbs said. "We're not really excited to wait until 10 years from now for another master plan."

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

For that reason, Greer Park is now emerging as the top choice for some group members. Unlike Cubberley, which has been subject to numerous master plans and false starts over the past two decades, the park is owned by the city. It also has the benefits of being centrally located and of being large enough to accommodate a potential gym.

According to O'Kane, the city has already analyzed four possible locations in Greer Park and decided the most suitable one for the gym is along the western edge of the park. Known as Site C, it sits near the baseball fields and immediately adjacent to the parking lot, which would be expanded.

This diagram shows the proposed location of a Greer Park gym. Courtesy city of Palo Alto

Beecham said he believes Greer Park is the best place for a new gym. The Cubberley plans, he noted, are proceeding on their own timeline, subject to negotiations between the city and a broader debate about redevelopment of the community center. Given the larger scale of a Cubberley redevelopment, it would also likely entail a bond measure, he said.

"It won't be with private money there because you won't have someone in the private sector to contribute something on a scale of that nature," Beecham said.

By contrast, if the city wants to build a gym with private funds, Greer Park is "the only place it'll go," Beecham said at the meeting.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

Others, however, see a new Cubberley gym as exactly the type of project that could jumpstart the long-delayed and endlessly debated redevelopment of the community center. Just about everyone at the meeting agreed that Cubberley, a bustling hub that includes nonprofit spaces, classrooms, art studios and other uses, desperately needs a fix-up.

"We have such smart people in Palo Alto and great designers and planners," Cribbs said. "And I believe we could use the gym to kickstart and be the catalyst for the whole project and design around it or do what you have to do and get it started."

To date, planning for a Cubberley redevelopment has been a slog for everyone involved. In 2019, the city and the school district partnered on a master plan for the community center that envisioned a jointly developed campus with new athletic facilities, performing centers, park spaces and other amenities. That vision, however, was quickly scuttled after the school district indicated that it has no desire to tear down existing facilities and it cannot help fund the construction of any project that does not directly relate to education. The district also indicated that it wants to preserve land for a future school, should a need arise.

While that position effectively killed the master plan, the city and the school district are now once again discussing a property sale for Cubberly. And things are now sprinting forward, said Council member Pat Burt, who serves on a subcommittee charged with negotiating with the district over a possible sale.

Burt said the city and the school district have each held closed sessions on the topic in recent weeks, and representatives from the two bodies are now preparing for another meeting. He also noted the board has indicated that it wants the issue resolved in the next few months, a radical departure from its historic wait-and-see approach.

"So we have a partner who is very interested in coming up with what we all wanted for a long time – a long-term agreement on Cubberley that would give us the latitude to do the sorts of things that we are envisioning," Burt said at the meeting. "That's very likely to happen very quickly. That's what makes Cubberley a possibility for a gym location."

While the question of where to build the gym remains unresolved, some residents argued Wednesday that Cubberley would clearly be their preferred location. Among them was Joe Hirsch, who works at the Cardiac Therapy Foundation, a Cubberley-based organization that provides rehabilitation programs for individuals with cardiac disease.

"We need a facility here in south Palo Alto," Hirsch said at the Jan. 17 meeting. "We always seem in south Palo Alto to be trying to catch up when facilities are placed elsewhere in the city, and having a wellness center or a gym on West Bayshore Drive, near (U.S. Highway) 101, is not the best place."

Penny Ellson, who lives close to Cubberley and who has been involved in master planning efforts for the community center, said she was concerned that placing a gym at Greer Park would make it harder to build momentum for the Cubberley redevelopment because it may remove gym advocates from the existing coalition who support the project.

"I like the idea of using a gym to inspire and bring people to the idea that Cubberley can go somewhere," Ellson said.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now
Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Get uninterrupted access to important local city government news. Become a member today.

New coalition looks to revive effort to build Palo Alto gym

Friends group looks to raise more than $30M for a new wellness center

A new coalition that includes former mayors, philanthropists, athletes and civic volunteers is spearheading a $33-million campaign to revive a popular project: building Palo Alto's first city-owned gym.

The project has been on the city's radar since early 2022, when developer John Arrillaga proposed funding and building a new gym, a project that city officials had identified as a high priority for recreation needs. Arrillaga, who is known for constructing athletic facilities at Stanford University and in Menlo Park, was also planning to design, construct and spend about $30 million on the project.

But Arrillaga died shortly after he made the proposal and Palo Alto's gym project has been in limbo since, with plenty of community support but no financial backing or real plans to advance it.

Now, things may be turning around. At a Jan. 17 community meeting, city staff and volunteers with the new group Friends of Palo Alto Recreation & Wellness Center offered some uplifting news for local gym advocates. They've identified two potential locations: Greer Park and Cubberley Community Center. The fundraising drive is now kicking off. And the city's negotiations with the Palo Alto Unified School District, which owns much of Cubberley, are now speeding up after years of disagreements over its redevelopment.

The demand for a new gym has not diminished since Arrillaga's offer, according to Kristen O'Kane, director of the Community Services Department. By all accounts, Cubberley remains in shoddy shape. Some of its gym spaces have been unusable for more than a year due to water damage caused by leaking pipes. And even if they were functional, that part of Cubberley is the property of the school district, which owns 27 of the 35 acres on the center on Middlefield Road.

"We do rent gyms from the school district at Cubberley, but we do not own any," O'Kane said. "And the need for gym space is increasing for youth sports, for adults, seniors and therapeutic recreation, which produces programming for people with disabilities."

The new Friends group is hoping to expand gym capacity by following the model that has been used in other local projects that leaned heavily on private donations, including the recently renovated $25 million Palo Alto Junior Museum and Zoo and the soon-to-be-completed $11.9 million Palo Alto Museum on Homer Avenue.

Former mayors Bern Beecham, who worked on the Junior Museum and Zoo project, and Tom DuBois, who strongly advocated for the history museum, are both members of the new Friends group. The team also includes former Mayor Judy Kleinberg as well as Parks and Recreation Commission members Anne Cribbs (a former Olympian), Jeff LaMere and Nellis Freeman. Other members include retired banker Roger Smith, former Deputy City Manager Steve Emslie, Tim Stitt, Yudy Deng and Marc Guillett.

Cribbs said a key goal is to get a gym built sooner rather than later.

"We'd like to see shovels in the ground as soon as we raise the money to build the gym and get permits," Cribbs said. "We're not really excited to wait until 10 years from now for another master plan."

For that reason, Greer Park is now emerging as the top choice for some group members. Unlike Cubberley, which has been subject to numerous master plans and false starts over the past two decades, the park is owned by the city. It also has the benefits of being centrally located and of being large enough to accommodate a potential gym.

According to O'Kane, the city has already analyzed four possible locations in Greer Park and decided the most suitable one for the gym is along the western edge of the park. Known as Site C, it sits near the baseball fields and immediately adjacent to the parking lot, which would be expanded.

Beecham said he believes Greer Park is the best place for a new gym. The Cubberley plans, he noted, are proceeding on their own timeline, subject to negotiations between the city and a broader debate about redevelopment of the community center. Given the larger scale of a Cubberley redevelopment, it would also likely entail a bond measure, he said.

"It won't be with private money there because you won't have someone in the private sector to contribute something on a scale of that nature," Beecham said.

By contrast, if the city wants to build a gym with private funds, Greer Park is "the only place it'll go," Beecham said at the meeting.

Others, however, see a new Cubberley gym as exactly the type of project that could jumpstart the long-delayed and endlessly debated redevelopment of the community center. Just about everyone at the meeting agreed that Cubberley, a bustling hub that includes nonprofit spaces, classrooms, art studios and other uses, desperately needs a fix-up.

"We have such smart people in Palo Alto and great designers and planners," Cribbs said. "And I believe we could use the gym to kickstart and be the catalyst for the whole project and design around it or do what you have to do and get it started."

To date, planning for a Cubberley redevelopment has been a slog for everyone involved. In 2019, the city and the school district partnered on a master plan for the community center that envisioned a jointly developed campus with new athletic facilities, performing centers, park spaces and other amenities. That vision, however, was quickly scuttled after the school district indicated that it has no desire to tear down existing facilities and it cannot help fund the construction of any project that does not directly relate to education. The district also indicated that it wants to preserve land for a future school, should a need arise.

While that position effectively killed the master plan, the city and the school district are now once again discussing a property sale for Cubberly. And things are now sprinting forward, said Council member Pat Burt, who serves on a subcommittee charged with negotiating with the district over a possible sale.

Burt said the city and the school district have each held closed sessions on the topic in recent weeks, and representatives from the two bodies are now preparing for another meeting. He also noted the board has indicated that it wants the issue resolved in the next few months, a radical departure from its historic wait-and-see approach.

"So we have a partner who is very interested in coming up with what we all wanted for a long time – a long-term agreement on Cubberley that would give us the latitude to do the sorts of things that we are envisioning," Burt said at the meeting. "That's very likely to happen very quickly. That's what makes Cubberley a possibility for a gym location."

While the question of where to build the gym remains unresolved, some residents argued Wednesday that Cubberley would clearly be their preferred location. Among them was Joe Hirsch, who works at the Cardiac Therapy Foundation, a Cubberley-based organization that provides rehabilitation programs for individuals with cardiac disease.

"We need a facility here in south Palo Alto," Hirsch said at the Jan. 17 meeting. "We always seem in south Palo Alto to be trying to catch up when facilities are placed elsewhere in the city, and having a wellness center or a gym on West Bayshore Drive, near (U.S. Highway) 101, is not the best place."

Penny Ellson, who lives close to Cubberley and who has been involved in master planning efforts for the community center, said she was concerned that placing a gym at Greer Park would make it harder to build momentum for the Cubberley redevelopment because it may remove gym advocates from the existing coalition who support the project.

"I like the idea of using a gym to inspire and bring people to the idea that Cubberley can go somewhere," Ellson said.

Comments

Ken Horowitz
Registered user
University South
on Jan 18, 2024 at 6:59 pm
Ken Horowitz, University South
Registered user
on Jan 18, 2024 at 6:59 pm

A City owned gym at Cubberley will not happen unless the City can buy some of the School District’s 27 acres. Long term leasing is not ownership. So these negotiations will now involve three parties, the new Friends Group, the City, and PAUSD and finally our ~68,000 residents to come together on this project. South Palo Alto already has the YMCA and the JCC for recreation/gym facilities. Let’s work with them on meeting these athletic needs and spend our funds on other Palo Alto issues.


Tom DuBois
Registered user
Midtown
on Jan 19, 2024 at 8:48 am
Tom DuBois, Midtown
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2024 at 8:48 am

A gym (or 2 or 3) at Cubberly has always been part of the cities planning effort for a redeveloped Cubberley. I don't think this should be a case of "either or". The Friends have been focused on funding an addiitonal gym beyond what has been planned. Currenly the city rents gyms at Cubberley so those would need to be replaced if no longer rented, but they could continue to be rented for along time. If not the number of gyms would actually decrease, not increase.

That is why a location like Greer is being evaluated - to increase the total amount of gym space. A gym facility on one of the city's larger parks near playing fields would be a great addition.


Bystander
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 19, 2024 at 9:21 am
Bystander, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2024 at 9:21 am

I would be in favour of City spending money on a gym as it would benefit residents of Palo Alto primarily and it is about time our facilities' infrastructure was prioritized. Greer Park would be my choice as it would fit in with what is already there and there are many different ways to access the park.


Eric Filseth
Registered user
Downtown North
on Jan 19, 2024 at 9:31 am
Eric Filseth, Downtown North
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2024 at 9:31 am

This got started under one circumstance, and then gathered momentum under a different one.

It could still be a good idea, But if it goes on Greer Park, then we lose some open park space in perpetuity. The City needs to take an evenhanded look at which use of that space serves Palo Altans better.


BobH
Registered user
Palo Verde
on Jan 19, 2024 at 10:16 am
BobH, Palo Verde
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2024 at 10:16 am

Is this really needed? How many other gyms are currently in Palo Alto?

I would have thought there are many higher priorities for the city like low cost housing, better support for EVs, robust electrical network, etc. than a public gym.

While it's nice that it will be paid for with private funds, I suspect the ongoing costs will be paid for by the city.


Online Name
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Jan 19, 2024 at 12:20 pm
Online Name, Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2024 at 12:20 pm

Echoing BobH about other priorities and asking how many commercial gyms are already here.

While plans for the gym may have been buried in various city planning documents, I don't understand why the city is so eager to spend OUR money to compete with existing proven commercial enterprises like for Fiber-to-The Home which many of us currently get from the companies the city's paying.

Yes, donations were made for the PA Junior Museum and Zoo but it STILL cost the city and residents a lot of money, esp. since they employed yet another consultant with no local knowledge who thought it was great idea to hike admissions prices.

Re priorities, how about doing a REAL survey about if residents prefer to have libraries FINALLY reopened 7 days a week and / or to see our utility rates reduced as people keep telling the city when they advertise this on FaceBook and NextDoor.


PST
Registered user
South of Midtown
on Jan 19, 2024 at 1:22 pm
PST, South of Midtown
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2024 at 1:22 pm

I am opposed to the city spending any money or resources for this effort given the many other things of greater importance such as extremely low income housing, a robust electric network, traffic law enforcement, street resurfacing and more. You don’t need a gym to get and stay healthy. We have the Y and maybe something could be worked out with Stanford or JCC for those who want greater gym access. A city owned gym would need ongoing city dollars to maintain it even if building costs were funded by private donations.


Moctod
Registered user
University South
on Jan 19, 2024 at 3:58 pm
Moctod, University South
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2024 at 3:58 pm

The only reason that this idea for yet another new City of Palo Alto project got on the priority list was the offer of a very generous donation of 30 million dollars by developer John Arrillaga to fund and build a new gym. I am sorry that he died and the offer was dropped but I do not understand how this project should now be a high priority for our city. Was this project on the top of the list of that survey that many residents completed a few months ago? It was not on my response.

I agree with BobH's comments on this article:

"I would have thought there are many higher priorities for the city like low cost housing, better support for EVs, robust electrical network, etc., than a public gym.
While it's nice that it will be paid for with private funds, I suspect the ongoing costs will be paid for by the city."

I belong to the Palo Alto YMCA, which has a large ADA compliant facility and a huge gym that often has just a few kids shooting hoops when I walk by. The rates are family friendly and very low in contrast to fitness clubs. The nice thing is that it is already there and serving our city.

For that matter, the City of Palo Alto already owns a two story elevator-equipped ADA compliant fitness building on 455 Bryant Street. This was formally Form Fitness and it was walkable for the residents and employees in the downtown area The last time I looked it was empty, reflecting wasted space and lost rents. Make it a priority to lease this to a fitness operator and let the many gyms already in Palo Alto cover the need for large-space indoor activities such as basketball.


Online Name
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Jan 19, 2024 at 4:27 pm
Online Name, Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2024 at 4:27 pm

As another example of the City of Palo Alto backing competition TO local businesses, today's front page of the other paper reports the city contracted with a Berkeley bike shop instead of Palo Alto Bicycles to offer consumer discounts under its Ride And Drive Clean program. This must be the 3d or 4th city failed program trying to rent / provide bikes first to commuters and now to residents in the last decade.


Bystander
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 19, 2024 at 4:51 pm
Bystander, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2024 at 4:51 pm

Comes down to what is a gym? Are we talking about a fitness studio or a facility with indoor space for basketball and gymnastics?

I think we have plenty of fitness studios. I think we need more indoor space for basketball and gymnastics? I have seen kids trying to train basketball outside in the drizzle with car headlights. At this time of year, indoor basketball facilities are not only for teams to train, but a great way for pickup games for teens at weekends and time off school.


Consider Your Options.
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 19, 2024 at 5:18 pm
Consider Your Options. , Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Jan 19, 2024 at 5:18 pm

The two gyms at Cubberley (on the PAUSD portion of the community center ) have been closed due to water intrusion for over a year. The need for a gym is an urgent problem because the city and PAUSD have been actively neglecting maintenance and bumbling through "negotiations" and "master planning" re: Cubberley's future for decades. We HAVE a site at Cubberley that is perfectly located to meet increased demand for gym and recreation services in close proximity to the parts of Palo Alto that are slated to get the lion's share of state-mandated high density housing. Cubberley desperately needs timely attention.

Gennady, if you are going to call one person out for being a neighbor of Cubberley, check to see where the well-heeled, well-connected "Friends" group members live--some in north Palo Alto and others in easy walking distance of Greer Park. (With the exception of Tom DuBois, who lives north of Meadow). Be fair. Acknowledge the gross inequity of community services and city facilities between north and south Palo Alto. Acknowledge that the southeast and southwest quadrants of PA are getting the lion's share of new high density housing--thousands of units.

That meeting was billed as an opportunity to "provide feedback on location of a future Recreation & Wellness Center with special attention on Greer Park and Cubberley." ALL of the concepts shown were for Greer Park. The only people who raised the issue of a gym at Cubberley were residents of south PA who were upset to see zero attention given to Cubberley by the city and "Friends" group. The "Friends" group actively argued for the Greer site. South PA continues to lose on services and get housing-- thousands of units. North Palo Alto, where are the big housing projects in YOUR neighborhoods? To which community center site in North Palo Alto is the city proposing to add high density housing as they have at Cubberley? Name one. Oh, you can't. This story reads like a press release. Money talks.


Online Name
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Jan 20, 2024 at 1:10 am
Online Name, Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
Registered user
on Jan 20, 2024 at 1:10 am

"That meeting was billed as an opportunity to "provide feedback on location of a future Recreation & Wellness Center with special attention on Greer Park and Cubberley."

Yup. And when this notice was posted on NextDoor, 80% of the commenters there asked why this was a priority and gave real feedback listing THEIR OTHER priorities.

Maybe Gennady could "report" on those others??

This is the same deceptive way Fiber-to-the-Home was pitched in that "survey" where they were already soliciting advance service deposits and there was no way to respond that you DIDN'T want it at any of the prices proposed.

Yup, money talks AND gets wasted on these fake community engagements, fake surveys, fake requests for feedback re specific issues like these and broader City PRIORITY SURVEYS that get 330 responses and with fixed broad alternatives like SUSTAINABILITY rather than underground wiring, MENTAL HEALTH vs removing "traffic calming" ...




tmp
Registered user
Downtown North
on Jan 20, 2024 at 11:13 am
tmp, Downtown North
Registered user
on Jan 20, 2024 at 11:13 am

Stop taking away open park space to cover it with cement buildings that are bad for the environment.

While a gym is a good idea, in and of itself, put human centered construction on areas that have already been covered and destroyed by people. Put it at Cubberley where there is already a gym, on ground that is already covered with buildings.

Leave what few open grassy areas we still have in this city alone. Leave Greer park green and unbuilt on.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.