https://n2v.paloaltoonline.com/square/print/2016/11/03/is-max-mcgee-really-up-to-the-job


Town Square

Is Max McGee Really Up to the Job?

Original post made by parent, Community Center, on Nov 3, 2016

This is a serious question and I think it is time to ask it. Is Max McGee really up to the job of managing the school district?

Regardless of which side you were on in the "weighted grades," "zero period," "Wayfinder School," "Paly Sexual Predator Scandal 1," "Paly Sexual Predator Scandal 2," "3 year union contract" or "Budget Deficit" and "Special Ed" controversies, it is undeniable that McGee has taken this district on a lurching journey from crisis to crisis. There have been countless times since his arrival here when the normal business of the district had to stop so that the board could respond to one mess after another. This means that the staff and board which should be attending to the education of our students is being forced over and over to pay attention to one damn thing after another.

My point is not that I am on one side or another of these controversies. It is that we shouldn't have so many out of control controversies at all. There are too many. Since he arrived it has just been one damn thing after another and I am concerned that the educational mission is now suffering.

There are some very significant concerns about how students are doing that are not being addressed. For example, while everyone was screaming about the failed leadership at Terman Middle School, or bogging down in the latest crisis in special ed, test scores at Barron Park Elementary for all students -- not just minority and poor students -- have hit the sub-basement. No one is doing anything about it. I suspect no one even knows about it. But that school is in crisis and the principal is flailing. Last year during the EMAC crisis (another unnecessary crisis), McGee acknowledged the issue and promised the board a report. He never delivered it.The news is bad. No one even knows.

What about our a-g completion rate? Remember when we made a-g the graduation standard? Every student should have had all a-g requirements other than Algegra 2 starting with the class of 2016 (last year). The math department was especially racist so they got 2 extra years to teach Algebra 2 to all students. Well, how are we doing? Did everyone get everything other than Alg2 and are we on the way to that?

McGee has no idea. Take a look at the board packet from the last meeting. He says we have no data on this. That is such a significant failure on his part that it alone is a basis for questioning his leadership and priorities.

I McGee does a poor job with managing subordinates. His management of personnel and special ed are particular failures but the budget crisis is also squarely on him. He does not manage effectively and that is in part why we are experiencing this situation. Looking at the test scores for BP and for underrepresented minority students district wide, It is reasonable to ask whether these repeated management failures are now affecting student learning.

So what is the board doing? Why aren't they calling him to account? This district used to have a rule of "no surprises." It's in the board protocols. Kevin Skelly got (rightfully) blasted into the stratosphere by the board and this newspaper for the surprise of the OCR findings.

That now looks like the good old days.

This board is so overwhelmed with surprise after surprise after surprise that they no longer even react. Surprise! The union asked to bargain the full day kinder but it didn't happen on time. Surprise! Surprise! There is no money left because our CFO really screwed up! Surprise! The superintendent is starting a new school and didn't tell the board! Surprise! Barron Park is failing! Surprise! Weighted grades somehow turned into a catastrophe because McGee couldn't figure out how to broker a solution before it went nuclear! Surprise! Same thing with the Terman principal! Surprise! Kevin Sharpe was accused of grooming a student for sex and Max and Scott left him in the classroom FOR A YEAR! Surprise! There is an all-out revolt over weighted grades that should have been managed by quickly just sending new transcripts to the University of Oregon! It was obvious that was going to blow up -- it's his job to handle it before it does. Surprise, surprise, surprise.

At this point the board just sits there, unable to keep its agenda, unable to get to the poor minority achievement on the agenda, or the fact that apparently McGee has failed to track it or collect data, because of yet another crisis that McGee failed to manage so that it did not take over the board agenda. The board meetings are now split between an hour of needless drivel in the "Superintendent's Report" and hours of bashing and screaming from out of control crises. No wonder our students are not being put first. Who can even focus on that?

In addition to his poor management of subordinates and his failure to manage community relations to prevent crisis from overwhelming the work of the district, McGee also has failed to handle our funds reponsibly and now the district is broke. Full stop.

Finally, he has also failed to comply with the law over and over. He spent over a year in open defiance of the public records law. He failed to ensure that Title IX was followed more than once (Kevin Sharp and Ronnie Farrell). He didn't even take board minutes for more than a year. This is minimum performance stuff.

Is Max McGee up to his job?

You could say -- this isn't worse than other supers. We had the Francis termination, Mandarin Immersion, the Calendar, OCR, and Everyday Math. True, but that was a handful such meltdowns in 15 years, versus many more just in the three years of McGee. The trajectory is not good.

Is it time for him to move on? This is not an academic question as the time to renew his contract is approaching. Our most vulnerable students (Special Ed, Barron Park, minority HS achievement) are already showing signs that things are not going well for them I think our canaries in our coal mine are already sick or dead.

Again -- this is NOT about weighted grades. I don't have a dog in that fight. This is about sound, competent management.

Comments

Posted by Parent of PA students
a resident of Barron Park
on Nov 3, 2016 at 8:36 am

I agree.
When we hired him and agreed to his top tier salary, 0% $M loan, car, and compensation package, I believed we were paying for exceptional quality leadership. Unfortunately, it appears we simply have an average quality administrator, making the usual mistakes, asking to our patience while he learns, and demonstrably unable to lead the district to the excellence we expected and deserve from someone so well compensated.

Time to call this hire what it is. an expensive mistake.


Posted by Marc
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 3, 2016 at 9:08 am

Just more of the same.

Since we moved here in 1990 we seem to be trapped in the same cycle over and over again. The existing superintendent is let go under a cloud of incompetence, mis-trust, etc. The school board does a search and claims they have found the perfect leader, glowing reviews and recommendations. Then as soon as they get here there are problems, things go downhill again and we start all over again.

Can't we find someone who can manage the district? Not a messiah, just a competent manger that won't cause a scandal, will take care of running the district without screwing it up?

/marc


Posted by Be Positive
a resident of Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Nov 3, 2016 at 10:32 am

Be Positive is a registered user.

Some of this can be fixed with new Board members. Hopefully we will have new faces after next weeks election! Fiscal responsibility and transparency so we can get back to running and improving our schools instead of putting out fires.


Posted by Mom
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Nov 3, 2016 at 10:45 am

Marc,

I give you 100 "likes" for you!
We should not waste anymore time for the search and selection period.
Dr. McGee is better than Keven Skelly and other previous one. We should stay with him for now.


Posted by Police - School Resource Officer
a resident of Greene Middle School
on Nov 3, 2016 at 11:45 am

Police - School Resource Officer is a registered user.

To the list of avoidable blow ups add: School Resource Officers (SROs) keeping no records of police contact with children at school. If parents are told there was an SRO, not telling parents the SRO is a police officer. Add calling SRO police officers in on children who are disabled and minorities. Add calling SRO police officers on elementary age children. Add telling the public you will update the procedures, then either don't do it or never providing them to the public.

Web Link


Posted by Clueless in PA
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 3, 2016 at 2:47 pm

Clueless in PA is a registered user.

I knew there would be a problem when the school board announced they would use the same head hunters they used to hire the much-detested Kevin Skelly. I even attended a school board meeting to convince them that this was a bad idea since Skelly had been a mistake.

I do think that part of the problem is with hiring candidates from other states. Unless these candidates are from New England, they don't understand what they are getting into when they come to the SF Bay Area. The dense population, immigration, multiple languages spoken, intense curricula, intense pressure, Tiger Parents, helicopter parents, etc.


Posted by Inside view
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 4, 2016 at 2:53 am

McGee has been flaunting all records laws, not just the public ones. This will blow up on him.

The more serious thing that will blow up on him is that he has a key underling who seems to be the kind of person who feeds on creating drama in others, then sitting back and enjoying watching everyone else implode. People like this are the last ones anyone expects to be responsible for an organization in constant crisis because they are such cool cucumbers. Here, such a person lies so effectively, er, so without remorse against families, this gets rewarded, never suspected. I think Skelly wasn't really any worse than McGee.


Posted by Inside View
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 4, 2016 at 12:26 pm

@parent,
Read The Starfish and the Spider. Not because we should have a leaderless organization, but because this community needs many of those principles. The leadership we have only knows the old top-down authoritarian model, for a Prussian educational system that is long overdue for change. In the heart of Silicon Valley, this is just utterly incompatible with the population.

I actually think McGee would be great in a more innovative collaborative model, but he lacks the unerring ethical compass and backbone to ferret out the insiders in the administration who are the biggest stumbling blocks to establishing trust and change. So he's gotten sucked into the Churchill quagmire, too.


Posted by Curmudgeon
a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 4, 2016 at 5:12 pm

"Is Max McGee Really Up to the Job?"

God Himself wouldn't be up to it. So give this human a break.


Posted by Help the needy
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Nov 4, 2016 at 7:21 pm

@cumudgeon
Some humans are more capable than other humans.
When one seeks a position of leadership, seeks authority over decisions affecting the futures and health of our children, what responsibility does that person bear for the consequences of mistakes and things for which you would give them a break ? Is there a particular number of breaks one is entitled to in any given time period ? Do the consequences of their bad decisions and lack of capability factor into your "give them a break" count?

I do not believe that the purpose of the PA school administrator position is to give some average skilled human a break at the expense of our kids. Is it a position that requires competence and accountability.






Posted by Inside View
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 4, 2016 at 8:32 pm

@Curmudgeon,
God himself most definitely would, because the lying, retaliation, and injustice against the vulnerable would not be protected and protracted like this. This community is full of creative people who give sacrificially for our schools. It is run in a way that is a slap to such a community. There are no checks and balances. The hierarchical structure of the admin and lack of accountability are never good in any community. Here the admin gets paid so much, they put our kids last.we need an iverhaul or we will keep getting more of the same. The same employees have lulled McGee into thinking the s&$t will never hit the fan if they just sweep things under the rug...


Posted by Curmudgeon
a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 4, 2016 at 9:08 pm

"This community is full of creative people who give sacrificially for our schools."

"Is it [sic] a position that requires competence and accountability."

Let's see... How many PAUSD supers in how many years? Hmmm?

Tell me: How come a community full of creative people is manifestly so unable to hire somebody ideally suited to everyone's wishes? Huh?

Nope. God Himself could not survive in that job in this community full of creative people who have no idea what they want, but who incessantly complain they ain't got it, and He's smart enough not to take it.


Posted by Inside View
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 4, 2016 at 9:24 pm

On the contrary, people in this community know they want HONESTY, openness, caring for our children, safe and welcoming schools, good financial stewardship, and freedom from things like lying, retaliation, and backbiting from district employees, among other things that are NO BRAINERS for school administration. The "insiders in the administration who are the biggest stumbling blocks to establishing trust and change" haven't turned over, they've been there to sew mistrust ever since - such a coincidence - the quality of the special ed department tanked.

I haven't seen a single administrator cone in a prioritize honesty and ferreting out the pernicious dishonesty. Until that hapoens, things won't get better and people like you will just keep blaming about the easiest parent community in the country. (If things are so bas, why is it so hard to get rid of these overpaid incompetents?)

.


Posted by Curmudgeon
a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 4, 2016 at 10:34 pm

"I haven't seen a single administrator cone in a prioritize honesty and ferreting out the pernicious dishonesty.

McGee has problems, prominent among them critics who either cannot state their case with any coherence, or do not bother to proofread their polemic gems. Maybe both. No surprise they repeatedly fail to recruit a super who meets criteria they cannot cogently define.


Posted by Inside View
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 4, 2016 at 11:20 pm

@Curmudgeon,
I take it back. We do have some terrible community members, chief among them, people who speak in hyperbole about the great families in Pao Alto being too terrible for even God (just because they expect school leadership competence) and think error prone typing of comments to an online forum on a tiny screen (that many people do) speaks at all to whether an administration is honest or does his job. I however have extensive experience with this parent community and find people here on the whole nicer, smarter, and more collaborative and reasonable than anywhere I have lived.

It doesn't matter, though, does it? The parents here could be half murderers and rapists, and still the superintendant has no excuse not to follow the law or educate the children.

Let's talk about what McGee doesn't do. He has no radar for unprofessional or even unlawful behavior by staff in special ed proceedings. Clearly, he hasn't been willing to let go poorly performing teachers or employees but rather lets them continue to create crisis after crisis. He led a tax ask that cost the district hundreds of thousands just for the special election, then spent the money on raises including for administrators instead of what was promised for student wellbeing. He got us into a financial mess despite this being a boom with record tax receipts. He doesn't honor records requests. Legal, clear, records requests, under the law. He doesn't investigate complaints of wrongdoing by staff. (!!) He doesn't follow up on Williams complaints in accordance with law. He doesn't properly report Williams-related complaints to the board. He tends to be more available unequally depending on the star/wealth factor of families. Despite claims to the contrary, he, like his predecessor, waits for things to boil over before acting, out of the expectation that many people will just go away discouraged.

This is like that elementary school in Cupertino, we need to just fire everyone and make everyone reapply (and not take back mostvof them). There us a deep rottonness at 25 Churchill that isn't McGee's fault but that he is doing nothing to fix. Until someone does, things will not improve. I really don't have it out for McGee, but his protecting people who continue this kind of nonsense like the bullying case in the news now. PAUSD once had an excellent reputation for special ed -- with the same kind of parent population, I should add.


Posted by Paly Parent
a resident of Crescent Park
on Nov 4, 2016 at 11:47 pm

"There is a deep rottenness at 25 Churchill that isn't McGee's fault but that he is doing nothing to fix. Until someone does, things will not improve."

This is spot on. There are some very weak performers at 25C, and McGee has done nothing to take it on (nor did Skelly). McGee recognized the weakness of the senior staff, but is unwilling to do anything about it. I guess being a short-timer (too close to retirement, contract certainly not going to be renewed), he doesn't see the point of all the work. But until some stronger, transparent, and principled senior staff come in, it will be hard to turn things around.


Posted by Curmudgeon
a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 5, 2016 at 12:45 pm

Well, if a person is judged by the inverse quality of his/her detractors, McGee has certainly made varsity.

Hang in there sir. But if the "honor" gets too burdensome, feel free to find new friends in a district blessed with a more genial, focused clientele who rationally dialog instead of rant.


Posted by We'll see
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Nov 5, 2016 at 2:08 pm

McGee has been moving from "new friends" to "new friends" for a while now. This might be the end of the line for him.


Posted by Inside View
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 5, 2016 at 2:27 pm

@Curmudgeon,
People who believe in that sort of ditch-problems-instead-of-solving-them, blame the victims, and pick-and-choose friends based on echo chamber fit don't belong in a PUBLIC school district which serves all children.

Where will he find these new friends anyway, you just savaged all parents here spouting such grim hyperbole you say even God wouldn't be able to help (speaking of ranters). Trying to marginalize the victims of problems and those who shed light on them and try to solve them has already done enough damage in our district. We need less of that pernicious CYA from all quarters, especially the district office.


Posted by Liar liar
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Nov 5, 2016 at 2:44 pm

[Post removed.]


Posted by Curmudgeon
a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 5, 2016 at 4:17 pm

"...you just savaged all parents here spouting such grim hyperbole..."


Guilty. I did call out all the parents (posters, actually) here that have been spouting grim hyperbole. Spouting grim hyperbole is a voluntary act, meaning they are a self-selected group, apparently and thankfully a very small group.

I believe the great majority of parents are rational actors, and my hat is off to them.


Posted by Inside View
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 5, 2016 at 4:52 pm

@Curnudgeon,
You just attacked my for defending parents and you spouted the hyperbole:

You said:
"God Himself wouldn't be up to [the job/dealing with district parents]. So give this human a break."

Then you go on to totally diss the community in your next posts, and go after me for defending parents here. Now you say your hat is off to parents.

What you haven't done is address McGee's leadership failures and the deep problems at 25 Churchill. Which I have seen directly hurt children and their families.

[Portion removed.]


Posted by Curmudgeon
a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 5, 2016 at 5:40 pm

[Post removed.]


Posted by Parent of PA students
a resident of Barron Park
on Nov 6, 2016 at 2:52 pm

@Curmugon
Unless you have children in the schools, or have personal experienced with the problems and real impacts to your student under the McGee watch, you're really not qualified to talk about "breaks" and pivot with witty repartee about the community's being to blame. Some of us have real and present problems with this administration and particularly this administrator. If you have issues with the community, please start another thread. My problems are with McGee, and that is the point of the article.


Posted by Curmudgeon
a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 6, 2016 at 6:23 pm

"Unless you have children in the schools, or have personal experienced with the problems and real impacts to your student under the McGee watch, you're really not qualified to talk about "breaks" and pivot with witty repartee about the community's being to blame."

I must very respectfully and firmly disagree. All PA homeowners have a stake in this silly brouhaha. A large component of our real estate valuations are supported by PAUSD's reputation, which too many on this thread are energetically and needlessly trashing. I see no rationality in their arguments, only an inchoate necessity to rant. Fine, but please find a deserving target and have fun.


Posted by Inside View
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 6, 2016 at 6:31 pm

@Curmudgeon,
@ Parent of PAUSD said nothing about you having a stake or not. You may have a stake. This does not make you any less ignorant when you talk off the cuff and know nothing about this, with no direct experience either. @Parent of PAUSD Students hit it right on the nose. You seem to be on several of these threads lately and need to vent. You may wish to take your own advice and "find a deserving target" where your nastiness can make you feel good but won't hurt families or children trying to solve serious issues. If the issue here is your property values, you should hope the families finally get through and make change and solve problems, or we haven't seen the bottom by a long shot. There is indeed something very rotton at 25 Churchill, and it's a crying shame given this wonderful parent and student community. (In case you haven't been following things, CYA and superficially protecting a brand does backfire.)