Town Square

Post a New Topic

Excerpts: Remarks by Alaska Governor Sarah Palin

Original post made by mike stevens, Gunn High School, on Sep 3, 2008

This has just been released to distribution

Excerpts: Remarks by Alaska Governor Sarah Palin
Vice Presidential Nominee to Address the 2008 Republican National Convention
Wed Sep 03 2008 19:12:27 ET

SAINT PAUL, Minn. - This evening Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the Republican Party’s vice presidential nominee, will address the 2008 Republican National Convention. Excerpts from the governor’s remarks:

On her experience as a public servant:

"I had the privilege of living most of my life in a small town. I was just your average hockey mom, and signed up for the PTA because I wanted to make my kids’ public education better. When I ran for city council, I didn’t need focus groups and voter profiles because I knew those voters, and knew their families, too. Before I became governor of the great state of Alaska, I was mayor of my hometown. And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves. I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a ‘community organizer,’ except that you have actual responsibilities."

On why she is going to Washington, D.C.:

"I’m not a member of the permanent political establishment. And I’ve learned quickly, these past few days, that if you’re not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone. But here’s a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I’m not going to Washington to seek their good opinion - I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this country."

On energy policies that the McCain-Palin administration will implement:

"Our opponents say, again and again, that drilling will not solve all of America’s energy problems - as if we all didn’t know that already. But the fact that drilling won’t solve every problem is no excuse to do nothing at all. Starting in January, in a McCain-Palin administration, we’re going to lay more pipelines...build more nuclear plants...create jobs with clean coal...and move forward on solar, wind, geothermal, and other alternative sources. We need American energy resources, brought to you by American ingenuity, and produced by American workers."

On John McCain:

"Here’s how I look at the choice Americans face in this election. In politics, there are some candidates who use change to promote their careers. And then there are those, like John McCain, who use their careers to promote change."




Comments (14)

Posted by paul s
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Sep 3, 2008 at 5:18 pm



Great points! If she has good delivery she will knock it out of the park,I cannot wait to see it live tonight


Posted by Gimme a break
a resident of Barron Park
on Sep 3, 2008 at 5:59 pm

1. There are quite a number of people who serve on the PTA or in civic affairs, and it doesn't qualify them to be vice president either. A swing and a miss for strike one.

2. John McCain's 26 years in the Sentate also makes him one of the Washington Elite. Strike two call.

3. Given that John McCain has voted with George Bush 90% of the time, I wouldn't exactly call him an agent of change, career or otherwise. A swing and a miss there also.

Sorry Sarah. You didn't even get the bat on the ball.

Typical Republican Tantrum -- blame the media!


Posted by Reality Check
a resident of Midtown
on Sep 3, 2008 at 6:47 pm

"I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this country"

No, you're going there to force your far-right views on the people of this country, "God willing" (i.e, God makes McCain pass away).


Posted by fred
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Sep 3, 2008 at 8:39 pm



As an independent I feel she did an excellent job of delivery and has passed with a+ the first test, she put the whole vile and evil attacks on her and her children in the dust, a major loss for the NYT and the Atlantic etc.

Next will be the interviews and debates, but so far she is the champion.

A real role model as to how to deal with the gutter journalists and to preserve ones personal and family dignity, truly a pit bull with lipstick. I must say I am very impressed by Sarah Barracuda as is my wife( a democrat )


Posted by anonymous
a resident of Crescent Park
on Sep 3, 2008 at 9:10 pm

Palin hit it out of the park. Easily as compelling as anything I've heard from Obama. I was going for Obama until he changed his mind on every position he took in the primaries. Leaning heavily toward McCain/Palin. One thing I especially enjoyed is how she put the press in its place. I listed to some of her speech on KPFA and had to change channels because their wuss announcer was commenting on her remarks in real time!! How rude!!
Then I went to KQED and all they could say was that she didn't get a big appluuse for a few points she mentioned. I almost can't stand to listen to all my old media favorites any more because they're so petty.


Posted by get real
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Sep 3, 2008 at 9:10 pm

You can be impressed by a person (I think McCain has an admirable history), impressed by speech (wow - Sarah belittles the media!), but neither of those make a person right on the issues. Let's at least focus on the issues.

The RNC is pathetic, though. How do they keep a straight face?

GOP faithful talk about McCain's edge in military service and more time in government. By that logic, Gore and Kerry were better choices than Bush.

Rudy Giuliani gives Palin the edge over Obama because "he's never been in charge of anything." But check McCain's bio - he has no executive experience either.

They talk about tax-and-spend liberals who want big government, while Bush has expanded government and put us all, and future generations, into massive debt to foreign banks; meanwhile the last balanced budget and the last credible effort at streamlining the federal government both occurred in the Clinton administration.

And so it goes...


Posted by annoyed
a resident of another community
on Sep 3, 2008 at 9:11 pm

Reality check......be careful, what goes around, comes around. be careful with your interpretation.


Posted by Just Pathetic
a resident of Stanford
on Sep 3, 2008 at 9:14 pm


I'm seriously wondering if there has ever been a more cynical, disrespectful, insane VP nomination.


Posted by get real
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Sep 3, 2008 at 9:20 pm

I almost never believe posts (like "anonymous" from Crescent Park) or media interviews claiming that people were for Clinton or Obama but now they're switching because Hilary lost, or because of Palin, or whatever. Or vice versa - I was going to vote for McCain but not anymore....... unless you only care about the personality and not the issues. Seriously - what issues that matter to you regarding the future of our country could lead you to favor one side, and then some petty superficial wishy washy political triviality makes you abandon your concern on that front and favor the candidate who stands for the opposite? sorry if my tone is too sarcastic or rude or whatever because it's actually a somewhat serious question, now that I think about it. Is there anyone out there who changed their mind about candidates who can address what they've done in terms of issues. Like, "I used to support pro-choice, pro-labor, anti-war environmentalist, but since there's been some minor matters of style that gave me minor emotional distress, I'll now cast my vote for the candidate who opposes everything I believe in."


Posted by Independent Perspective
a resident of another community
on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:27 pm

Get Real:

You can choose to believe this or not, but I was actually undecided on McCain until he made this pick of Palin. Now there's no way that I can support him.

They say that a VP pick ultimately doesn't matter to people - well, I say there's a first time for everything and I do believe this is going to be a significant factor, akin to the Nader siphoning of votes from Gore in 2000. It is energizing the conservative base for Republicans, but it's also going to energize the so-called Hilliary Diehards for Obama. The real difference is I can see no way that Palin will swing over the crucial independent voters (like myself) to McCain.


Posted by Yeah, i can believe it
a resident of Stanford
on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:43 pm

"The real difference is I can see no way that Palin will swing over the crucial independent voters (like myself) to McCain."

Just wait until Palin and McCain get air time, start to circulate, and do the debates. I heard this claptrap in 2004, when the effete left appointed Kerry. They followed with Obama? Get real. Someone who has written two books but not even one significant piece of legislation? That's when I left the party.


Posted by Yeah, i can believe it
a resident of Stanford
on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:46 pm

"GOP faithful talk about McCain's edge in military service and more time in government. By that logic, Gore and Kerry were better choices than Bush."

And guess who won? I voted for Kerry, and held my nose. I couldn't vote for Obama because I'd have to use two hands to keep from smelling the cult perfume.


Posted by Spare Us
a resident of Stanford
on Sep 3, 2008 at 11:00 pm


There's no way a Palin fanatic voted for a Dem in '04.


Posted by The Aftermath
a resident of Green Acres
on Sep 3, 2008 at 11:06 pm

David Gergen's take:
She'll appeal to white trash (oh, sorry, let me be PC here: "blue collar folks")
But forget the real soccer moms.
Web Link


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.